Husserl’s Theory of Bodily Expressivity and its Revision: In View of the “1914 Texts”

IF 1.1 2区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIETY FOR PHENOMENOLOGY Pub Date : 2021-10-18 DOI:10.1080/00071773.2021.1991236
Zhida Luo
{"title":"Husserl’s Theory of Bodily Expressivity and its Revision: In View of the “1914 Texts”","authors":"Zhida Luo","doi":"10.1080/00071773.2021.1991236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT It is well-known that Husserl denies bodily behaviour as expressive in the I. Logical Investigation but he dramatically changes his view and holds that bodily behaviour is essentially expressive in works such as Ideas II. A mainstream explanation of the change is that Husserl develops a more cogent conception of embodiment such that he can ultimately include bodily behaviour into the category of expressive phenomena. In this paper, I explore another source of this change by examining the by and large overlooked “1914 texts.” I argue that the change is significantly informed by Husserl’s revised conception of indication, such that he can offer a proper account of the intimate relation between the body and the spirit and, eventually, opt for a new view of bodily expressivity. By doing so, I also elucidate some intrinsic characteristics of bodily expressivity, such as its demand feature and its twofold unity.","PeriodicalId":44348,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIETY FOR PHENOMENOLOGY","volume":"53 1","pages":"315 - 331"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIETY FOR PHENOMENOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2021.1991236","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT It is well-known that Husserl denies bodily behaviour as expressive in the I. Logical Investigation but he dramatically changes his view and holds that bodily behaviour is essentially expressive in works such as Ideas II. A mainstream explanation of the change is that Husserl develops a more cogent conception of embodiment such that he can ultimately include bodily behaviour into the category of expressive phenomena. In this paper, I explore another source of this change by examining the by and large overlooked “1914 texts.” I argue that the change is significantly informed by Husserl’s revised conception of indication, such that he can offer a proper account of the intimate relation between the body and the spirit and, eventually, opt for a new view of bodily expressivity. By doing so, I also elucidate some intrinsic characteristics of bodily expressivity, such as its demand feature and its twofold unity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胡塞尔的身体表达理论及其修正——以“1914文本”为视角
众所周知,胡塞尔在《第一篇逻辑研究》中否认身体行为具有表达性,但他在《理念二》等著作中戏剧性地改变了观点,认为身体行为本质上具有表达性。对这一变化的一种主流解释是,胡塞尔发展了一个更有说服力的具体化概念,这样他最终可以将身体行为纳入表达现象的范畴。在这篇论文中,我通过研究基本上被忽视的“1914年文本”来探索这种变化的另一个来源。我认为,胡塞尔对指示的概念进行了修订,从而为身体和精神之间的亲密关系提供了恰当的解释,并最终选择了一种新的身体表达观。由此,我也阐释了身体表达的一些内在特征,如它的需求特征和它的双重统一性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Husserl’s Notion of Solitary Speech Reconsidered: In Conversation with Vygotsky What Makes Natural Language “Natural”? A Phenomenological Proposal Infinity, Ideality, Transcendentality: The Idea in the Kantian Sense in Husserl and Derrida Sartre on Action: Decentring the Will Ontologically Interactive Painting: On Susan Rothenberg’s Three Heads
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1