The Great Leap Offshore: Sino-Norwegian Relations and Petro-Knowledge Transfers, 1976–1997

IF 0.7 2区 历史学 Q4 BUSINESS Enterprise & Society Pub Date : 2022-02-08 DOI:10.1017/eso.2022.4
J. Gjersø
{"title":"The Great Leap Offshore: Sino-Norwegian Relations and Petro-Knowledge Transfers, 1976–1997","authors":"J. Gjersø","doi":"10.1017/eso.2022.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"China’s reemergence among the world’s leading economic and political powers has been one of the most defining changes in the international order since the end of the Cold War. Underpinning China’s ascent were the economic reforms instituted across the late 1970s and early 1980s that opened its economy to foreign direct investments. Preceding these reforms were the ambitions entertained for China’s continental shelf, optimistically forecasting it as nothing less than “the world’s richest petroleum reservoir.” This article will attempt to link these phenomena by examining the economic readjustment in conjunction with the capital- and technology-intensive requirements of the offshore oil industry. It will explore how petroleum knowledge was diffused between Norway and China: notably, how Chinese reformers abandoned the Daqinigst doctrine of self-reliance in favor of a hybrid Norwegian model of petroleum governance. Even though exploration efforts proved disappointing, the episode had both long-term political and commercial ramifications. It was during this often-overlooked episode of Chinese, international, and indeed Norwegian petroleum history that Norway’s national oil company, Statoil, took its first steps outside the Norwegian continental shelf and inspired the formation of China’s own national offshore oil company, China National Offshore Oil Corporation.","PeriodicalId":45977,"journal":{"name":"Enterprise & Society","volume":"24 1","pages":"617 - 641"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enterprise & Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/eso.2022.4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

China’s reemergence among the world’s leading economic and political powers has been one of the most defining changes in the international order since the end of the Cold War. Underpinning China’s ascent were the economic reforms instituted across the late 1970s and early 1980s that opened its economy to foreign direct investments. Preceding these reforms were the ambitions entertained for China’s continental shelf, optimistically forecasting it as nothing less than “the world’s richest petroleum reservoir.” This article will attempt to link these phenomena by examining the economic readjustment in conjunction with the capital- and technology-intensive requirements of the offshore oil industry. It will explore how petroleum knowledge was diffused between Norway and China: notably, how Chinese reformers abandoned the Daqinigst doctrine of self-reliance in favor of a hybrid Norwegian model of petroleum governance. Even though exploration efforts proved disappointing, the episode had both long-term political and commercial ramifications. It was during this often-overlooked episode of Chinese, international, and indeed Norwegian petroleum history that Norway’s national oil company, Statoil, took its first steps outside the Norwegian continental shelf and inspired the formation of China’s own national offshore oil company, China National Offshore Oil Corporation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海上大跃进:中挪关系与石油知识转移,1976-1997
中国在世界主要经济和政治大国之列的重新崛起,是冷战结束以来国际秩序中最具决定性的变化之一。支撑中国崛起的是上世纪70年代末和80年代初实施的经济改革,这些改革向外国直接投资开放了中国经济。在这些改革之前,人们对中国大陆架抱有雄心壮志,乐观地预测它不亚于“世界上储量最丰富的石油储藏地”。本文将通过考察经济调整与海上石油工业的资本和技术密集型要求相结合,试图将这些现象联系起来。它将探讨石油知识是如何在挪威和中国之间传播的:值得注意的是,中国的改革者是如何放弃大秦主义的自力更生学说,转而采用挪威混合的石油治理模式的。尽管勘探工作令人失望,但这一事件对政治和商业都产生了长期影响。正是在这段常常被忽视的中国、国际乃至挪威石油史上,挪威国家石油公司(Statoil)迈出了走出挪威大陆架的第一步,并启发了中国自己的国有海洋石油公司——中国海洋石油总公司的成立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
30.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Enterprise & Society offers a forum for research on the historical relations between businesses and their larger political, cultural, institutional, social, and economic contexts. The journal aims to be truly international in scope. Studies focused on individual firms and industries and grounded in a broad historical framework are welcome, as are innovative applications of economic or management theories to business and its context.
期刊最新文献
Industrial Policy and its Funding at the Frontier of European Integration: Lessons from the Past and Present Challenges Paper Steaks: Live Cattle Futures Markets and the Financial Revolution of 1964 The Role of Forecasts in Planning for Energy Infrastructure: A Historical Look at Past Futures in Postwar Quebec “Killing Complaints with Courtesy”: The Role of Relationship Building in the Success of the Early U.S. Central Power Stations (1890–1938) Wartime segmentation: Class, gender, and nation in the marketing of consumers, Sweden 1939–1945
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1