“How can a small app piss off an entire country?”: India’s TikTok ban in the light of everyday techno-nationalism

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 ANTHROPOLOGY Inter-Asia Cultural Studies Pub Date : 2023-06-23 DOI:10.1080/14649373.2023.2209424
Linn Song, Avishek Ray
{"title":"“How can a small app piss off an entire country?”: India’s TikTok ban in the light of everyday techno-nationalism","authors":"Linn Song, Avishek Ray","doi":"10.1080/14649373.2023.2209424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this paper, we employ “everyday techno-nationalism” as a critical lens to unpack the Indian government’s ban of TikTok in 2020. We focus on social media discussions of the ban on Quora and Reddit, and examine how TikTok is perceived as a “Chinese” platform as contrasted, but simultaneously integral, to a techno-nationalist imagination of “Indian-ness.” We put forward two arguments based on our findings. First, we suggest that TikTok’s “Chineseness” is a populist affective outcome of the discursive articulation of Indian “nationhood,” achieved by the effective use of an us-versus-them rhetoric, which signifies a process of digital territorialization amid globalized media flows. Second, we observe that the classist-casteist narrative underscoring TikTok’s association with “cringeworthiness” marginalizes the working-class content creators – so prominently visibilized by TikTok – both from the media landscape and the nationalist imagination. Fundamentally, India’s TikTok ban raises questions about statist interventions into people’s media practices; and as importantly, their own understanding and use of digital technology, which, ironically, within a globalized era, seems to be only notionally more connected, but practically more partisan than ever.","PeriodicalId":46080,"journal":{"name":"Inter-Asia Cultural Studies","volume":"24 1","pages":"382 - 396"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inter-Asia Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2023.2209424","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper, we employ “everyday techno-nationalism” as a critical lens to unpack the Indian government’s ban of TikTok in 2020. We focus on social media discussions of the ban on Quora and Reddit, and examine how TikTok is perceived as a “Chinese” platform as contrasted, but simultaneously integral, to a techno-nationalist imagination of “Indian-ness.” We put forward two arguments based on our findings. First, we suggest that TikTok’s “Chineseness” is a populist affective outcome of the discursive articulation of Indian “nationhood,” achieved by the effective use of an us-versus-them rhetoric, which signifies a process of digital territorialization amid globalized media flows. Second, we observe that the classist-casteist narrative underscoring TikTok’s association with “cringeworthiness” marginalizes the working-class content creators – so prominently visibilized by TikTok – both from the media landscape and the nationalist imagination. Fundamentally, India’s TikTok ban raises questions about statist interventions into people’s media practices; and as importantly, their own understanding and use of digital technology, which, ironically, within a globalized era, seems to be only notionally more connected, but practically more partisan than ever.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“一个小应用怎么能惹恼整个国家?:鉴于日常技术民族主义,印度对TikTok的禁令
在本文中,我们以“日常技术民族主义”为关键视角来解读印度政府在2020年对TikTok的禁令。我们专注于社交媒体对Quora和Reddit禁令的讨论,并研究TikTok如何被视为一个“中国”平台,与技术民族主义者对“印度性”的想象形成鲜明对比,但同时又是不可或缺的。根据我们的发现,我们提出了两个论点。首先,我们认为TikTok的“中国性”是印度“国家”话语表达的民粹主义情感结果,通过有效使用“我们对他们”的修辞来实现,这标志着全球化媒体流中的数字领土化过程。其次,我们观察到,强调TikTok与“令人畏缩”的联系的阶级-种姓主义叙事,在媒体景观和民族主义想象中,都将工人阶级的内容创作者边缘化了——TikTok如此突出地体现了这一点。从根本上说,印度对TikTok的禁令引发了人们对中央政府干预人们媒体行为的质疑;同样重要的是,他们对数字技术的理解和使用,具有讽刺意味的是,在一个全球化的时代,数字技术似乎只是在概念上更紧密地联系在一起,但实际上却比以往任何时候都更加党派化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The cultural question is among the most important yet difficult subjects facing inter-Asia today. Throughout the 20th century, worldwide competition over capital, colonial history, and the Cold War has jeopardized interactions among cultures. Globalization of technology, regionalization of economy and the end of the Cold War have opened up a unique opportunity for cultural exchanges to take place. In response to global cultural changes, cultural studies has emerged internationally as an energetic field of scholarship. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies gives a long overdue voice, throughout the global intellectual community, to those concerned with inter-Asia processes.
期刊最新文献
Visualising the borderlands: Kang Yong Suk’s Korean state village photographs The making of Malayans: life-writing and memory work by Wang Gungwu and He Jin Negotiating difficult (in)tangible heritage: the intricate journey of museum making for the “Dai-ichi Saloon” comfort station in Shanghai Breaking the mold of servitude: subaltern agency and possibilities of freedom in Elias’ Khwabnama Sense and scents: Kulsum’s smell-world and Khwabnama as an affective assemblage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1