Waterscapes of power in Bangladesh: The politics and anthropology of contested access in large-scale irrigation modernisation

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Australian Journal of Anthropology Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1111/taja.12419
Jim Taylor
{"title":"Waterscapes of power in Bangladesh: The politics and anthropology of contested access in large-scale irrigation modernisation","authors":"Jim Taylor","doi":"10.1111/taja.12419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper is drawn from ethnographically informed research undertaken in 2016‒2017 pertaining to the planned modernisation of two large-scale irrigation schemes in Bangladesh, funded by the Asian Development Bank. The research confirms existing critical irrigation anthropology on the politics and power of large-scale irrigation modernisation and related drive to privatisation. The modernisation of the scheme aimed to increase water, energy and agricultural productivity and to include a new higher-level irrigation management service. Irrigation, it is argued, also has considerable social consequences because it defines specific patterns of cooperation and conflict in serviced agricultural areas. The modernisation of the scheme overlooked socio-cultural, political and ethnoecological considerations largely due to complex institutional constraints and the existing social modalities of power. In the field, using the anthropological method, information was generated in order to better understand the various stakeholder perceptions of the modernisation program and advise on practical implementations. In particular, the research noted how and in what manner dominant and influential social and political alliances control these complex waterscapes.</p>","PeriodicalId":45452,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Anthropology","volume":"33 1","pages":"47-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/taja.12419","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/taja.12419","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is drawn from ethnographically informed research undertaken in 2016‒2017 pertaining to the planned modernisation of two large-scale irrigation schemes in Bangladesh, funded by the Asian Development Bank. The research confirms existing critical irrigation anthropology on the politics and power of large-scale irrigation modernisation and related drive to privatisation. The modernisation of the scheme aimed to increase water, energy and agricultural productivity and to include a new higher-level irrigation management service. Irrigation, it is argued, also has considerable social consequences because it defines specific patterns of cooperation and conflict in serviced agricultural areas. The modernisation of the scheme overlooked socio-cultural, political and ethnoecological considerations largely due to complex institutional constraints and the existing social modalities of power. In the field, using the anthropological method, information was generated in order to better understand the various stakeholder perceptions of the modernisation program and advise on practical implementations. In particular, the research noted how and in what manner dominant and influential social and political alliances control these complex waterscapes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孟加拉国的水景权力:大规模灌溉现代化中有争议的政治和人类学
本文取材于2016-2017年进行的民族志研究,该研究与亚洲开发银行资助的孟加拉国两个大型灌溉计划的计划现代化有关。该研究证实了现有的关于大规模灌溉现代化的政治和权力以及与私有化相关的动力的批判性灌溉人类学。该计划的现代化旨在提高水、能源和农业生产力,并包括一个新的更高水平的灌溉管理服务。有人认为,灌溉还具有相当大的社会影响,因为它确定了服务农业地区的特定合作和冲突模式。该计划的现代化忽略了社会文化、政治和民族生态学方面的考虑,这主要是由于复杂的制度限制和现有的社会权力模式。在现场,使用人类学方法,生成信息,以便更好地了解各种利益相关者对现代化计划的看法,并就实际实施提出建议。该研究特别指出了主导和有影响力的社会和政治联盟如何以及以何种方式控制这些复杂的水景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Editorial The Fences: A webcomic on collective debt and ruination in Paraguay Fire's habit: Elemental media and the politics of apprehension Filming jilba: Sensing beyond the exclusionary fictions of climate science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1