Use of joint supervised machine learning algorithms in assessing the geotechnical peculiarities of erodible tropical soils from southeastern Nigeria

J. C. Egbueri
{"title":"Use of joint supervised machine learning algorithms in assessing the geotechnical peculiarities of erodible tropical soils from southeastern Nigeria","authors":"J. C. Egbueri","doi":"10.1080/17486025.2021.2006803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Multiple machine learning algorithms were integrated in this study to assess the geotechnical peculiarities of tropical soils from erosion sites in Nigeria. Laboratory analyses of the soils, which followed standard methods, revealed that they are erodible in nature. Results of correlation, principal component and factor analyses revealed the relationships between geotechnical variables, which were later used for artificial neural network (ANN) modelling. Soil particle distribution was predicted and analyzed using ANN1 (with sigmoid output activation) and ANN2 (with identity output activation). However, ANN2 gave more reliable prediction than ANN1, with R2 averaging 0.913 and 0.522, respectively. Low ANN model errors were also reported. Furthermore, soil erodibility potential, with emphasis on the grainsize distribution, was predicted using logistic regression analysis (LRA). The LRA results showed that the model accurately classified soil erosion events by 90%, and further revealed that sand content is the priority influencer of soil erodibility, more than gravel and fines contents. Thus, the likelihood of high soil erosion events in the area increases with sand %. The logistic regression model was tested for reliability based on Cox & Snell and Nagelkerke R-squares – R2 = 0.593 and R2 = 0.791, respectively – indicating that the model is acceptable and reliable.","PeriodicalId":46470,"journal":{"name":"Geomechanics and Geoengineering-An International Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":"16 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomechanics and Geoengineering-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2021.2006803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

ABSTRACT Multiple machine learning algorithms were integrated in this study to assess the geotechnical peculiarities of tropical soils from erosion sites in Nigeria. Laboratory analyses of the soils, which followed standard methods, revealed that they are erodible in nature. Results of correlation, principal component and factor analyses revealed the relationships between geotechnical variables, which were later used for artificial neural network (ANN) modelling. Soil particle distribution was predicted and analyzed using ANN1 (with sigmoid output activation) and ANN2 (with identity output activation). However, ANN2 gave more reliable prediction than ANN1, with R2 averaging 0.913 and 0.522, respectively. Low ANN model errors were also reported. Furthermore, soil erodibility potential, with emphasis on the grainsize distribution, was predicted using logistic regression analysis (LRA). The LRA results showed that the model accurately classified soil erosion events by 90%, and further revealed that sand content is the priority influencer of soil erodibility, more than gravel and fines contents. Thus, the likelihood of high soil erosion events in the area increases with sand %. The logistic regression model was tested for reliability based on Cox & Snell and Nagelkerke R-squares – R2 = 0.593 and R2 = 0.791, respectively – indicating that the model is acceptable and reliable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联合监督机器学习算法在评估尼日利亚东南部易受侵蚀热带土壤岩土特性中的应用
摘要本研究集成了多种机器学习算法,以评估尼日利亚侵蚀点热带土壤的岩土特性。按照标准方法对土壤进行的实验室分析表明,这些土壤在自然界中是易受侵蚀的。相关性、主成分和因子分析的结果揭示了岩土工程变量之间的关系,这些变量后来被用于人工神经网络(ANN)建模。使用ANN1(具有sigmoid输出激活)和ANN2(具有身份输出激活)预测和分析土壤颗粒分布。然而,与ANN1相比,ANN2给出了更可靠的预测,R2平均值分别为0.913和0.522。还报告了低ANN模型误差。此外,使用逻辑回归分析(LRA)预测了土壤可蚀性潜力,重点是颗粒度分布。LRA结果表明,该模型对土壤侵蚀事件的准确率为90%,并进一步揭示了沙子含量是土壤可蚀性的首要影响因素,而不是砾石和细粒含量。因此,该地区发生高土壤侵蚀事件的可能性随着砂含量的增加而增加。基于Cox&Snell和Nagelkerke R平方对逻辑回归模型进行了可靠性测试,R2分别为0.593和0.791,表明该模型是可接受和可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Geomechanics is concerned with the application of the principle of mechanics to earth-materials (namely geo-material). Geoengineering covers a wide range of engineering disciplines related to geo-materials, such as foundation engineering, slope engineering, tunnelling, rock engineering, engineering geology and geo-environmental engineering. Geomechanics and Geoengineering is a major publication channel for research in the areas of soil and rock mechanics, geotechnical and geological engineering, engineering geology, geo-environmental engineering and all geo-material related engineering and science disciplines. The Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of innovative ideas, especially between researchers in Asia and the rest of the world.
期刊最新文献
Analytical evaluation of partially stiffened granular piled raft with the effect of rigidity of bearing stratum A parametric study on deformation behaviour for design of braced excavation in soft clay Effect of leachate and used motor oil on the geotechnical and mechanical characteristics of soils with different mineralogy under different moisture conditions Influence of edge distance on experimental p-y curves for piles near slope Performance of loosely skirted square footing resting on reinforced sand under vertical concentric and eccentric loading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1