Intersectional and Relational Frameworks:Confronting Anti-Blackness, Settler Colonialism, and Neoliberalism in U.S. Social Work

IF 2.3 Q1 SOCIAL WORK Journal of Progressive Human Services Pub Date : 2020-03-04 DOI:10.1080/10428232.2019.1703246
Jennifer Maree Stanley
{"title":"Intersectional and Relational Frameworks:Confronting Anti-Blackness, Settler Colonialism, and Neoliberalism in U.S. Social Work","authors":"Jennifer Maree Stanley","doi":"10.1080/10428232.2019.1703246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Positivist epistemologies have been argued to advance learning and interventions to improve the health of multiply marginalized and colonized people; however, these long-standing approaches have not served social and health equity. An intersectionality health equity lens understands differences in health to be impacted by the social position of multiply marginalized and colonized people embedded in systems of oppression. Bringing forward the sociohistorical contexts of whiteness and respectability in US social work provides necessary insight into how white supremacy can produce and replicate itself through policy and practice. Whiteness and respectability politics reinforce settler colonialism in the US and provide a foundation for neoliberal, sociopolitical economic policy that monitors, controls, and shapes the lives of multiply marginalized and colonized communities. Critical knowledge development engaging intersectionality is needed for US social workers to participate in structural change without perpetuating inequity and dispossession. Eradicating the violence of capitalism for future generations necessitates a radical relational praxis to deepen the sociopolitical economic analysis of economies of health inequity.","PeriodicalId":44255,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Progressive Human Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10428232.2019.1703246","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Progressive Human Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428232.2019.1703246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

ABSTRACT Positivist epistemologies have been argued to advance learning and interventions to improve the health of multiply marginalized and colonized people; however, these long-standing approaches have not served social and health equity. An intersectionality health equity lens understands differences in health to be impacted by the social position of multiply marginalized and colonized people embedded in systems of oppression. Bringing forward the sociohistorical contexts of whiteness and respectability in US social work provides necessary insight into how white supremacy can produce and replicate itself through policy and practice. Whiteness and respectability politics reinforce settler colonialism in the US and provide a foundation for neoliberal, sociopolitical economic policy that monitors, controls, and shapes the lives of multiply marginalized and colonized communities. Critical knowledge development engaging intersectionality is needed for US social workers to participate in structural change without perpetuating inequity and dispossession. Eradicating the violence of capitalism for future generations necessitates a radical relational praxis to deepen the sociopolitical economic analysis of economies of health inequity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨部门和关系框架:美国社会工作中的反黑人、定居者殖民主义和新自由主义
摘要实证主义的认识论被认为是为了促进学习和干预,以改善被边缘化和被殖民的人群的健康;然而,这些长期存在的方法并没有为社会和健康公平服务。交叉性的健康公平视角理解健康差异会受到压迫制度中被多重边缘化和殖民的人的社会地位的影响。在美国社会工作中提出白人和受人尊敬的社会历史背景,为白人至上主义如何通过政策和实践产生和复制自身提供了必要的见解。白人和受人尊敬的政治强化了美国的定居者殖民主义,并为新自由主义、社会政治经济政策提供了基础,该政策监督、控制和塑造了被边缘化和被殖民社区的生活。美国社会工作者需要参与跨部门的关键知识开发,以参与结构变革,而不会使不公平和剥夺权利永久化。为子孙后代消除资本主义的暴力需要一种激进的关系实践,以深化对健康不平等经济的社会政治经济分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The only journal of its kind in the United States, the Journal of Progressive Human Services covers political, social, personal, and professional problems in human services from a progressive perspective. The journal stimulates debate about major social issues and contributes to the development of the analytical tools needed for building a caring society based on equality and justice. The journal"s contributors examine oppressed and vulnerable groups, struggles by workers and clients on the job and in the community, dilemmas of practice in conservative contexts, and strategies for ending racism, sexism, ageism, heterosexism, and discrimination of persons who are disabled and psychologically distressed.
期刊最新文献
Meaningful Healthcare and Social Service Access for Homeless Populations: Generating Alliances Through Theories of Therapeutic Landscape African Knowledge Production Incubators: Approaching Indigenous and Decolonized Social Work from the Ground Up Through Stories of Our Lived Experiences Social Constructions of Sex Trafficking and Needs for a Critical Intersectional and Trauma-Informed Approach: A Critical Review An Ineffectual Sermon: Matthew Desmond’s Poverty, by America Social Work Journals and the Disciplinary Production of Alternative Knowledge(s)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1