Chinese CEO, Risk Taking and the Power of CEO: Empirical Evidence from Malaysian Family Firms

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies Pub Date : 2021-06-02 DOI:10.22452/MJES.VOL58NO1.4
S. Foong, Jiunn-Shyan Khong, B. Lim
{"title":"Chinese CEO, Risk Taking and the Power of CEO: Empirical Evidence from Malaysian Family Firms","authors":"S. Foong, Jiunn-Shyan Khong, B. Lim","doi":"10.22452/MJES.VOL58NO1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the risk taking behaviour of Chinese CEO. Our analysis is based on a sample of 362 family firms in Malaysia over the 2009-2015 period using panel GMM methodology. Firstly, our results offer evidence that Chinese CEOs are risk taking. We then examine how CEO power, in the context of Finkelstein’s (1992) structural power, ownership power, expert power and prestige power, might drive risk taking of Chinese CEOs. The results are rather mixed where greater ownership power is likely to promote higher risk taking but greater expert power resulted in lower risk taking. We further show that corporate governance can mitigate risk taking of Chinese CEO in family firms. When the proportions of independent directors and foreign institutional shareholdings exceed the median thresholds of 40% and 5%, respectively, we find that CEO risk taking behaviour turns from positive to negative. Stronger evidence is found when we adjust the thresholds to the 75th percentile of 50% and 15%, respectively. The result is also robust with the use of leverage as a measure for CEO risk taking.","PeriodicalId":42743,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/MJES.VOL58NO1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper examines the risk taking behaviour of Chinese CEO. Our analysis is based on a sample of 362 family firms in Malaysia over the 2009-2015 period using panel GMM methodology. Firstly, our results offer evidence that Chinese CEOs are risk taking. We then examine how CEO power, in the context of Finkelstein’s (1992) structural power, ownership power, expert power and prestige power, might drive risk taking of Chinese CEOs. The results are rather mixed where greater ownership power is likely to promote higher risk taking but greater expert power resulted in lower risk taking. We further show that corporate governance can mitigate risk taking of Chinese CEO in family firms. When the proportions of independent directors and foreign institutional shareholdings exceed the median thresholds of 40% and 5%, respectively, we find that CEO risk taking behaviour turns from positive to negative. Stronger evidence is found when we adjust the thresholds to the 75th percentile of 50% and 15%, respectively. The result is also robust with the use of leverage as a measure for CEO risk taking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国CEO、风险承担与CEO权力——来自马来西亚家族企业的经验证据
本文考察了我国CEO的风险承担行为。我们的分析基于2009-2015年期间马来西亚362家家族企业的样本,使用面板GMM方法。首先,我们的研究结果提供了证据,证明中国的首席执行官是敢于冒险的。然后,在Finkelstein(1992)的结构权力、所有权权力、专家权力和声望权力的背景下,我们考察了CEO权力如何驱动中国CEO的风险承担。结果是相当复杂的,更大的所有权可能会促进更高的风险承担,但更大的专家权力导致更低的风险承担。我们进一步发现,公司治理可以降低家族企业中国CEO的风险承担。当独立董事比例和外资机构持股比例分别超过中位数阈值40%和5%时,我们发现CEO的风险承担行为由正向负转变。当我们将阈值分别调整到50%和15%的第75个百分位数时,发现了更有力的证据。使用杠杆作为衡量CEO风险承担程度的指标,结果也很稳健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The primary purpose of the journal is to promote publications of original research related to the Malaysian economy. It is also designed to serve as an outlet for studies on the South-east Asian countries and the Asian region. The journal also considers high-quality works related to other regions that provide relevant policy lessons to Malaysia. The journal is receptive to papers in all areas of economics. We encourage specifically contributions on all range of economic topics of an applied or policy nature. At the same time, submissions of methodological or theoretical studies with results that are of practical use are welcome. Works that are interdisciplinary will be considered provided that they contain substantial economic contents.
期刊最新文献
Minimum Wage and Employment of Malaysian Low-skilled Workers Does Local Risk Still Matter in the Highly Liberalised Emerging Market of Malaysia? Effects of Government Expenditure on the Poverty Level: A Nonlinear ARDL Approach Including Public Realism in Determining New Pricing Scheme for Sanitary Landfill in Malaysia Does the Founder CEO Receive a Higher Pay for the Firm’s Performance? Evidence from Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1