Detection of Radon Exhalation from Various Building Materials Using CR-39, RAD7, and Biosensors

IF 0.6 Q4 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Atom Indonesia Pub Date : 2022-12-10 DOI:10.17146/aij.2022.1178
B. J. Albazoni, H. J. Almayahi
{"title":"Detection of Radon Exhalation from Various Building Materials Using CR-39, RAD7, and Biosensors","authors":"B. J. Albazoni, H. J. Almayahi","doi":"10.17146/aij.2022.1178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study aimed to design and manufacture two biosensors, namely BIOS-I and BIOS-II, for 222 Rn and Pb+2 measurements in building materials and soil samples. For comparison, the conventional detectors of RAD7 and CR-39 were used. The biosensor material used was based on ssDNA rich guanine or primer. The two biosensors have a difference in the sequence of the nitrogenous bases. The measurement revealed that the average of 222 Rn exhalation by the BIOS-Ι was 373.30 Bqm-3, while the BIOS-ΙΙ was 342.29 Bqm-3. The average 222 Rn exhalation measured by the CR-39 detector was 326.17 Bqm-3, whereas by the RAD7 detector it was 319.95 Bqm-3. This study found that 222 Rn exhalation in the Indian and Chinese granites, soil, and Iraqi mosaic samples was higher than the limits recommended by WHO, while the rest of the samples were within the permissible limits. It is also known that there is a very weak positive correlation between BIOS-Ι or BIOS-ΙΙ and humidity, while a very weak negative correlation was found between them and temperature. There is a very strong positive correlation between radon exhalation recorded by RAD7 and humidity. On the other hand, there are no statistically significant differences between BIOS-I and BIOS-II at (level 0.01), while there are statistically significant differences between BIOS-I and CR-39 or RAD7 at level 0.01. It was concluded that the manufactured biosensors have better detection for radon than RAD 7 and CR-39 detectors.","PeriodicalId":8647,"journal":{"name":"Atom Indonesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atom Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17146/aij.2022.1178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Study aimed to design and manufacture two biosensors, namely BIOS-I and BIOS-II, for 222 Rn and Pb+2 measurements in building materials and soil samples. For comparison, the conventional detectors of RAD7 and CR-39 were used. The biosensor material used was based on ssDNA rich guanine or primer. The two biosensors have a difference in the sequence of the nitrogenous bases. The measurement revealed that the average of 222 Rn exhalation by the BIOS-Ι was 373.30 Bqm-3, while the BIOS-ΙΙ was 342.29 Bqm-3. The average 222 Rn exhalation measured by the CR-39 detector was 326.17 Bqm-3, whereas by the RAD7 detector it was 319.95 Bqm-3. This study found that 222 Rn exhalation in the Indian and Chinese granites, soil, and Iraqi mosaic samples was higher than the limits recommended by WHO, while the rest of the samples were within the permissible limits. It is also known that there is a very weak positive correlation between BIOS-Ι or BIOS-ΙΙ and humidity, while a very weak negative correlation was found between them and temperature. There is a very strong positive correlation between radon exhalation recorded by RAD7 and humidity. On the other hand, there are no statistically significant differences between BIOS-I and BIOS-II at (level 0.01), while there are statistically significant differences between BIOS-I and CR-39 or RAD7 at level 0.01. It was concluded that the manufactured biosensors have better detection for radon than RAD 7 and CR-39 detectors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用CR-39、RAD7和生物传感器检测各种建筑材料中的氡排放
本研究旨在设计和制造两种生物传感器,即BIOS-I和BIOS-II,用于测量建筑材料和土壤样品中的222个Rn和Pb+2。为了比较,我们使用了传统的RAD7和CR-39探测器。所使用的生物传感器材料以富含ssDNA的鸟嘌呤或引物为基础。这两种生物传感器的含氮碱基序列不同。测量结果显示,BIOS-Ι 222 Rn呼出的平均值为373.30 Bqm-3,而BIOS-ΙΙ为342.29 Bqm-3。CR-39探测器测得的222 Rn平均呼出量为326.17 Bqm-3,而RAD7探测器测得的平均呼出量为319.95 Bqm-3。本研究发现,在印度和中国的花岗岩、土壤和伊拉克的马赛克样品中,222 Rn的呼出量高于世界卫生组织推荐的限值,而其余样品均在允许范围内。我们还知道,BIOS-Ι或BIOS-ΙΙ与湿度之间存在非常弱的正相关关系,而与温度之间存在非常弱的负相关关系。RAD7记录的氡呼出量与湿度有很强的正相关关系。另一方面,BIOS-I与BIOS-II在0.01水平上差异无统计学意义,BIOS-I与CR-39或RAD7在0.01水平上差异有统计学意义。结果表明,该传感器对氡的检测效果优于rad7和CR-39探测器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Atom Indonesia
Atom Indonesia NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The focus of Atom Indonesia is research and development in nuclear science and technology. The scope of this journal covers experimental and analytical research in nuclear science and technology. The topics include nuclear physics, reactor physics, radioactive waste, fuel element, radioisotopes, radiopharmacy, radiation, and neutron scattering, as well as their utilization in agriculture, industry, health, environment, energy, material science and technology, and related fields.
期刊最新文献
External Bremsstrahlung Studies on Films of Lead Monoxide Filled Polycarbonate Composite Radon Concentration in Urban Areas in the North and West of Morocco Geologic Influence on Radon Concentrations Levels in Cave: A Case Study of Mimpi Cave in the Maros Karst of South Sulawesi, Indonesia Elemental Mapping and Quantities in Different Soybean Seed Colors Using Micro X-Ray Fluorescence and Their Correlations with Germination Assessment of 137Cs in the Environment of Hetauda City, Nepal by In-Situ Gamma Ray Spectrometry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1