Evaluating the benefits and risks of social media for wildlife conservation

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Facets Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1139/facets-2021-0112
Jordanna N. Bergman, R. Buxton, Hsien‐Yung Lin, Magdalena Lenda, Kayla Attinello, Adrianne C. Hajdasz, S. Rivest, Thu Trang Tran Nguyen, S. Cooke, J. Bennett
{"title":"Evaluating the benefits and risks of social media for wildlife conservation","authors":"Jordanna N. Bergman, R. Buxton, Hsien‐Yung Lin, Magdalena Lenda, Kayla Attinello, Adrianne C. Hajdasz, S. Rivest, Thu Trang Tran Nguyen, S. Cooke, J. Bennett","doi":"10.1139/facets-2021-0112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given its extensive volume and reach, social media has the potential to widely spread conservation messaging and be a powerful tool to mobilize social change for conserving biodiversity. We synthesized gray and primary academic literature to investigate the effects of social media on wildlife conservation, revealing several overarching benefits and risks. We found that social media can increase pro-conservation behaviours among the public, increase conservation funding, and incite policy changes. Conversely, social media can contribute to species exploitation and illegal trade, cause unprecedented increases in tourism in protected areas, and perpetuate anti-conservation behaviours via misinformation. In most cases, we found that content sharing on social media did not result in a detectable impact on conservation; in this paper, however, we focus on providing examples where conservation impact was achieved. We relate these positive and negative outcomes of social media to psychological phenomena that may influence conservation efforts and discuss limitations of our findings. We conclude with recommendations of best practices to social media administrators, public social media users, nongovernmental organizations, and governing agencies to minimize conservation risks while maximizing beneficial outcomes. By improving messaging, policing online misconduct, and providing guidance for action, social media can help achieve wildlife conservation goals.","PeriodicalId":48511,"journal":{"name":"Facets","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facets","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2021-0112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Given its extensive volume and reach, social media has the potential to widely spread conservation messaging and be a powerful tool to mobilize social change for conserving biodiversity. We synthesized gray and primary academic literature to investigate the effects of social media on wildlife conservation, revealing several overarching benefits and risks. We found that social media can increase pro-conservation behaviours among the public, increase conservation funding, and incite policy changes. Conversely, social media can contribute to species exploitation and illegal trade, cause unprecedented increases in tourism in protected areas, and perpetuate anti-conservation behaviours via misinformation. In most cases, we found that content sharing on social media did not result in a detectable impact on conservation; in this paper, however, we focus on providing examples where conservation impact was achieved. We relate these positive and negative outcomes of social media to psychological phenomena that may influence conservation efforts and discuss limitations of our findings. We conclude with recommendations of best practices to social media administrators, public social media users, nongovernmental organizations, and governing agencies to minimize conservation risks while maximizing beneficial outcomes. By improving messaging, policing online misconduct, and providing guidance for action, social media can help achieve wildlife conservation goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估社会媒体对野生动物保护的利益和风险
鉴于其广泛的数量和影响范围,社交媒体有可能广泛传播保护信息,并成为动员社会变革以保护生物多样性的有力工具。我们综合了灰色和初级学术文献,调查了社交媒体对野生动物保护的影响,揭示了几个总体的好处和风险。我们发现,社交媒体可以增加公众的保护行为,增加保护资金,并引发政策变化。相反,社交媒体可能助长物种开发和非法贸易,导致保护区旅游业空前增长,并通过错误信息使反保护行为持续下去。在大多数情况下,我们发现社交媒体上的内容共享不会对保护产生可检测的影响;然而,在本文中,我们的重点是提供实现保护影响的例子。我们将社交媒体的这些积极和消极结果与可能影响保护工作的心理现象联系起来,并讨论了我们研究结果的局限性。最后,我们向社交媒体管理员、公共社交媒体用户、非政府组织和管理机构提出了最佳实践建议,以最大限度地降低保护风险,同时最大化有益结果。通过改善信息传递,监管网络不当行为,并为行动提供指导,社交媒体可以帮助实现野生动物保护目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Facets
Facets MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Conducting community-led research using trail cameras to develop baseline wandering domestic cat local abundance estimates Potential impacts of reduced seafood consumption on myocardial infarction among coastal First Nations in British Columbia, Canada Governing for transboundary environmental justice: a scientific and policy analysis of fish consumption advisory programs in the Upper St Lawrence River Historical gold mining increased metal(loid) concentrations in lake sediments from Nova Scotia, Canada Julie Morand-Ferron retrospective (1977–2022) for FACETS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1