{"title":"A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT IN LARGE-ENROLLMENT INTRODUCTORY STATISTICS","authors":"KimberLeigh Felix Hadfield","doi":"10.52041/serj.v22i1.99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Implementing formative assessment in large-enrollment statistics courses is recommended by mathematics and statistics education communities. Yet research maintains that large-enrollment courses employ few, if any, formative assessments, exacerbating negative attitudes toward statistics and low student achievement. This conceptual essay applies an andragogical approach to the theories of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and formative assessment. A literature review explicates the associations between formative assessment with feedback and reassessment with student attitudes and achievement. Resulting from the review, a conceptual framework is proposed that illustrates the relations between the elements of formative assessment cycles and student attitudes and achievement. The implications of this conceptual framework suggest a comprehensive transformation of assessment practices to provide pathways for student success in statistics courses.","PeriodicalId":38581,"journal":{"name":"Statistics Education Research Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics Education Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v22i1.99","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Implementing formative assessment in large-enrollment statistics courses is recommended by mathematics and statistics education communities. Yet research maintains that large-enrollment courses employ few, if any, formative assessments, exacerbating negative attitudes toward statistics and low student achievement. This conceptual essay applies an andragogical approach to the theories of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and formative assessment. A literature review explicates the associations between formative assessment with feedback and reassessment with student attitudes and achievement. Resulting from the review, a conceptual framework is proposed that illustrates the relations between the elements of formative assessment cycles and student attitudes and achievement. The implications of this conceptual framework suggest a comprehensive transformation of assessment practices to provide pathways for student success in statistics courses.
期刊介绍:
SERJ is a peer-reviewed electronic journal of the International Association for Statistical Education (IASE) and the International Statistical Institute (ISI). SERJ is published twice a year and is free. SERJ aims to advance research-based knowledge that can help to improve the teaching, learning, and understanding of statistics or probability at all educational levels and in both formal (classroom-based) and informal (out-of-classroom) contexts. Such research may examine, for example, cognitive, motivational, attitudinal, curricular, teaching-related, technology-related, organizational, or societal factors and processes that are related to the development and understanding of stochastic knowledge. In addition, research may focus on how people use or apply statistical and probabilistic information and ideas, broadly viewed. The Journal encourages the submission of quality papers related to the above goals, such as reports of original research (both quantitative and qualitative), integrative and critical reviews of research literature, analyses of research-based theoretical and methodological models, and other types of papers described in full in the Guidelines for Authors. All papers are reviewed internally by an Associate Editor or Editor, and are blind-reviewed by at least two external referees. Contributions in English are recommended. Contributions in French and Spanish will also be considered. A submitted paper must not have been published before or be under consideration for publication elsewhere.