Overview on Case Study Penetration Testing Models Evaluation

Q1 Multidisciplinary Emerging Science Journal Pub Date : 2023-05-14 DOI:10.28991/esj-2023-07-03-025
A. Al-Ahmad, Hasan Kahtan, Y. Alzoubi
{"title":"Overview on Case Study Penetration Testing Models Evaluation","authors":"A. Al-Ahmad, Hasan Kahtan, Y. Alzoubi","doi":"10.28991/esj-2023-07-03-025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Model evaluation is a cornerstone of scientific research as it represents the findings' accuracy and model performance. A case study is commonly used in evaluating software engineering models. Due to criticism in terms of generalization from a single case study and testers, deciding on the number of case studies used for evaluation and the number of testers has been one of the researchers’ challenges. Multiple case studies with multiple testers can be difficult in some domains, such as penetration testing, due to the complexity and time needed to prepare test cases. This study aims to review the literature and examine the evaluation methods used pertaining to the number of case studies and testers involved. This study is beneficial for researchers, students, and penetration testers as it provides case study design steps that are useful to determine the appropriate number of test cases and testers required. The paper's findings and novelty highlight that a single case study with a single tester is enough to evaluate a model. It also strikes a balance between what is enough for the evaluation and the need to reduce criticisms of a single case study by using two case studies with a single tester. Doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-03-025 Full Text: PDF","PeriodicalId":11586,"journal":{"name":"Emerging Science Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2023-07-03-025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Model evaluation is a cornerstone of scientific research as it represents the findings' accuracy and model performance. A case study is commonly used in evaluating software engineering models. Due to criticism in terms of generalization from a single case study and testers, deciding on the number of case studies used for evaluation and the number of testers has been one of the researchers’ challenges. Multiple case studies with multiple testers can be difficult in some domains, such as penetration testing, due to the complexity and time needed to prepare test cases. This study aims to review the literature and examine the evaluation methods used pertaining to the number of case studies and testers involved. This study is beneficial for researchers, students, and penetration testers as it provides case study design steps that are useful to determine the appropriate number of test cases and testers required. The paper's findings and novelty highlight that a single case study with a single tester is enough to evaluate a model. It also strikes a balance between what is enough for the evaluation and the need to reduce criticisms of a single case study by using two case studies with a single tester. Doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-03-025 Full Text: PDF
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
案例研究渗透测试模型评估综述
模型评价是科学研究的基石,它代表了研究结果的准确性和模型的性能。案例研究通常用于评估软件工程模型。由于来自单一案例研究和测试人员的泛化批评,决定用于评估的案例研究的数量和测试人员的数量一直是研究人员面临的挑战之一。由于准备测试用例的复杂性和所需的时间,在某些领域中,使用多个测试人员进行多个用例研究可能会很困难,比如渗透测试。本研究的目的是回顾文献,并检查与案例研究和涉及的测试人员的数量有关的评估方法。这项研究对研究人员、学生和渗透测试人员都是有益的,因为它提供了案例研究设计步骤,这些步骤对于确定所需的测试用例和测试人员的适当数量非常有用。这篇论文的发现和新颖性强调了用单个测试人员进行单个案例研究就足以评估一个模型。它还在足够的评估和需要之间取得平衡,通过使用两个案例研究和一个测试人员来减少单个案例研究的批评。Doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-03-025全文:PDF
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emerging Science Journal
Emerging Science Journal Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
155
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Beyond COVID-19 Lockdowns: Rethinking Mathematics Education from a Student Perspective Down-streaming Small-Scale Green Ammonia to Nitrogen-Phosphorus Fertilizer Tablets for Rural Communities Improved Fingerprint-Based Localization Based on Sequential Hybridization of Clustering Algorithms Prioritizing Critical Success Factors for Reverse Logistics as a Source of Competitive Advantage Assessment of the Development of the Circular Economy in the EU Countries: Comparative Analysis by Multiple Criteria Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1