Observing farm plots to increase attentiveness and cooperation with nature: a case study in Belgium

IF 3.5 2区 社会学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agriculture and Human Values Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1007/s10460-023-10497-5
Margaux Alarcon, Pascal Marty
{"title":"Observing farm plots to increase attentiveness and cooperation with nature: a case study in Belgium","authors":"Margaux Alarcon,&nbsp;Pascal Marty","doi":"10.1007/s10460-023-10497-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In intensive European agricultural areas, the control of weeds and wildlife within plots is of great importance. Yet, we can observe in many farming systems a renewal of farmers’ relationships with nature. Using the theoretical framework of care ethics, this paper aims to answer the following question: how observing plots allows farmers to develop more cooperation with nature in field crops? We base our results on an ethnographic survey conducted in Wallonia (Belgium) in 2019 among farm advisors and farmers in conventional, organic and conservation agriculture. The 19 in-depth interviews crossed partly with micro phenomenological interviews and participant observation sessions revealed that: (1) Observing plots increase farmers’ attentiveness to plots and plants, and favor care and knowledge based on direct contact with nature ; (2) Such observations renew how farmers take care of their plots and plants, towards adaptation, limitation and reduction of pesticides; (3) They also allow farmers to cooperate with specific species. In conclusion, we underline the importance of direct knowledge on agrosystems based on attentiveness to enable farmers to diversify how they relate to non-humans and especially how they care for their plots and plants. The attentiveness developed through plot observations thus enables farmers to establish more complex relationships with nature, made up of ecological care, based in particular on cooperation with non-humans. This emphasizes the value of the ethic of care in order to build communities.</p><p>Declaration of competing interest.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Human Values","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-023-10497-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In intensive European agricultural areas, the control of weeds and wildlife within plots is of great importance. Yet, we can observe in many farming systems a renewal of farmers’ relationships with nature. Using the theoretical framework of care ethics, this paper aims to answer the following question: how observing plots allows farmers to develop more cooperation with nature in field crops? We base our results on an ethnographic survey conducted in Wallonia (Belgium) in 2019 among farm advisors and farmers in conventional, organic and conservation agriculture. The 19 in-depth interviews crossed partly with micro phenomenological interviews and participant observation sessions revealed that: (1) Observing plots increase farmers’ attentiveness to plots and plants, and favor care and knowledge based on direct contact with nature ; (2) Such observations renew how farmers take care of their plots and plants, towards adaptation, limitation and reduction of pesticides; (3) They also allow farmers to cooperate with specific species. In conclusion, we underline the importance of direct knowledge on agrosystems based on attentiveness to enable farmers to diversify how they relate to non-humans and especially how they care for their plots and plants. The attentiveness developed through plot observations thus enables farmers to establish more complex relationships with nature, made up of ecological care, based in particular on cooperation with non-humans. This emphasizes the value of the ethic of care in order to build communities.

Declaration of competing interest.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
观察农田以提高对自然的关注和合作:比利时的一个案例研究
在欧洲的密集农业区,控制地块内的杂草和野生动物非常重要。然而,我们可以在许多农业系统中看到农民与自然关系的更新。本文以关爱伦理为理论框架,旨在回答以下问题:观察地块如何使农民在大田作物种植中与自然建立更多合作关系?我们的研究结果基于 2019 年在瓦隆(比利时)对传统农业、有机农业和保护性农业的农业顾问和农民进行的人种学调查。19 个深度访谈部分与微观现象学访谈和参与者观察环节交叉进行,结果表明(1) 观察地块提高了农民对地块和植物的关注度,有利于在与自然直接接触的基础上获得关爱和知识;(2) 这种观察更新了农民照料地块和植物的方式,有助于适应、限制和减少农药的使用;(3) 观察还使农民能够与特定物种合作。总之,我们强调基于细心的农业系统直接知识的重要性,它使农民能够多样化地处理与非人类的关系,特别是如何照料他们的地块和植物。因此,通过观察地块培养的细心使农民能够与大自然建立更复杂的关系,这种关系由生态关怀构成,特别是基于与非人类的合作。这就强调了关爱伦理在建设社区方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture and Human Values
Agriculture and Human Values 农林科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Agriculture and Human Values is the journal of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society. The Journal, like the Society, is dedicated to an open and free discussion of the values that shape and the structures that underlie current and alternative visions of food and agricultural systems. To this end the Journal publishes interdisciplinary research that critically examines the values, relationships, conflicts and contradictions within contemporary agricultural and food systems and that addresses the impact of agricultural and food related institutions, policies, and practices on human populations, the environment, democratic governance, and social equity.
期刊最新文献
Books received A buzzword, a “win-win”, or a signal towards the future of agriculture? A critical analysis of regenerative agriculture Valuing farmers in transitions to more sustainable food systems: A systematic literature review of local food producers’ experiences and contributions in short food supply chains Make the desert bloom—imaginaries, infrastructure, and water-land entanglement in desert agriculture in Israel Correction: Between “better than” and “as good as”: mobilizing social representations of alternative proteins to transform meat and dairy consumption practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1