Exhibition, decision-making and controversy: a case study of Art of Escape (2016) by Ana Vieira (1940–2016)

IF 0.5 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of the Institute of Conservation Pub Date : 2022-05-04 DOI:10.1080/19455224.2022.2065690

Sofia Gomes, R. Macedo

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In the artist’s absence, a work’s reinstallation can become far more complex as there is no longer a single centralised reference point. Instead, there is a form of distributed memory that depends on the communication and negotiation between the various stakeholders responsible for the work’s conservation. As such, conservators and curators act as part of a larger network of agents, which includes the artist’s estate, gallerists, artist’s assistants, technicians, collectors and others, all with interests and expectations which influence the work’s trajectory. This article discusses the reinstallation of Art of Escape (2016) by the Portuguese artist Ana Vieira (1940–2016). The article asks what is it that makes the work Art of Escape and what does it mean for that work to change? We use Art of Escape to explore the reinstallation process for a work by analysing the perspective of various stakeholders while highlighting the conservator’s role in the decision-making process.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

展览、决策与争议：安娜·维埃拉（1940–2016）的《逃亡艺术》（2016）个案研究

在艺术家缺席的情况下，一件作品的重新装置会变得复杂得多，因为不再有一个单一的集中参考点。相反，存在一种分布式内存形式，它依赖于负责工作保存的各种涉众之间的沟通和协商。因此，文物保管员和策展人是一个更大的代理网络的一部分，这个网络包括艺术家的财产、画廊老板、艺术家助理、技术人员、收藏家和其他人，他们都有兴趣和期望影响作品的轨迹。本文讨论了葡萄牙艺术家Ana Vieira(1940-2016)的《逃离艺术》(Art of Escape, 2016)的重新装置。这篇文章提出了一个问题:是什么造就了《逃离的艺术》这部作品?对于这部作品的改变意味着什么?通过分析不同利益相关者的观点，我们利用“逃离的艺术”来探索一件作品的重新安装过程，同时强调了保护人员在决策过程中的作用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Journal of the Institute of Conservation HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of the Institute of Conservation is the peer reviewed publication of the Institute of Conservation (Icon). As such, its aims reflect those of Icon, to advance knowledge and education in conservation and achieve the long term preservation and conservation of moveable and immoveable cultural heritage. The Journal provides a collective identity for conservators; it promotes and supports both the profession and professionalism. With international contributions on all aspects of conservation, it is an invaluable resource for the heritage sector. The specific aims of the Journal are to: 1. promote research, knowledge and understanding of cultural heritage conservation through its history, practice and theory 2. provide an international forum to enable and disseminate advances in research, knowledge and understanding relating to conservation and heritage 3. champion and support professional standards of heritage conservation in the UK and internationally 4. provide a permanent record of issues relating to conservation and heritage 5. be financially and operationally sustainable. To achieve these aims, the Journal invites contributions from all those involved in the conservation of cultural heritage and related activities. Areas of interest include understanding cultural heritage materials and their degradation; subject reviews and histories of cultural heritage materials and conservation treatments; new, innovative or improved approaches to conservation and collections care theory, practice, communication, management and training; case studies demonstrating new, innovative or improved approaches; and conservation in its wider context. Submitters are encouraged to demonstrate how their work is of practical application to conservation. To maintain professional standards and promote academic rigour, submissions of articles and shorter notices are subject to an anonymous peer review process.