The Impact of Foreign Aid on Economic Growth in Africa: Empirical Evidence from Low Income Countries

IF 1.1 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES FORUM FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Pub Date : 2022-05-04 DOI:10.1080/08039410.2022.2080760
M. Tefera, N. Odhiambo
{"title":"The Impact of Foreign Aid on Economic Growth in Africa: Empirical Evidence from Low Income Countries","authors":"M. Tefera, N. Odhiambo","doi":"10.1080/08039410.2022.2080760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article aims to shed some insights into the ongoing debate on the aid-growth nexus by examining whether sources of aid matter in explaining aid effectiveness. In doing so, we consider three main proxies for bilateral aid based on three sources of aid such as Total Aid (TA); Traditional Donors aid (TDA) and Non-Traditional Donors aid (NTDA) as independent variables in a dynamic panel growth model within a system GMM framework. The study uses a panel dataset from 25 Low-Income Countries (LICs) in Africa over the period 2000–2017. The main findings show that the impact of aid on economic growth appears to be negative and significant for TA and TDA proxies, while it is positive but insignificant when the aid proxy is NTDA. A relatively larger share of TA and TDA disbursement away from the direct growth-enhancing productive sectors towards the unproductive sectors seems to have contributed to their strong negative impact on growth. The key policy implication is that governments in LICs in Africa and donors should work in collaboration to design effective ways to ensure that TDA should target the direct growth-enhancing sectors.","PeriodicalId":45207,"journal":{"name":"FORUM FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FORUM FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2022.2080760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract This article aims to shed some insights into the ongoing debate on the aid-growth nexus by examining whether sources of aid matter in explaining aid effectiveness. In doing so, we consider three main proxies for bilateral aid based on three sources of aid such as Total Aid (TA); Traditional Donors aid (TDA) and Non-Traditional Donors aid (NTDA) as independent variables in a dynamic panel growth model within a system GMM framework. The study uses a panel dataset from 25 Low-Income Countries (LICs) in Africa over the period 2000–2017. The main findings show that the impact of aid on economic growth appears to be negative and significant for TA and TDA proxies, while it is positive but insignificant when the aid proxy is NTDA. A relatively larger share of TA and TDA disbursement away from the direct growth-enhancing productive sectors towards the unproductive sectors seems to have contributed to their strong negative impact on growth. The key policy implication is that governments in LICs in Africa and donors should work in collaboration to design effective ways to ensure that TDA should target the direct growth-enhancing sectors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外援对非洲经济增长的影响:来自低收入国家的经验证据
摘要本文旨在通过研究援助来源是否有助于解释援助的有效性,来深入了解正在进行的关于援助与增长关系的辩论。在这样做的过程中,我们考虑了基于三种援助来源的双边援助的三个主要指标,如全面援助;传统捐助者援助(TDA)和非传统捐助者援助是系统GMM框架内动态面板增长模型中的自变量。该研究使用了2000-2007年期间非洲25个低收入国家的面板数据集。主要研究结果表明,援助对经济增长的影响似乎对TA和TDA指标是负面和显著的,而当援助指标是NTDA时,它是积极但不显著的。从直接促进增长的生产性部门向非生产性部门支付的TA和TDA中相对较大的份额似乎是其对增长产生强烈负面影响的原因之一。关键的政策含义是,非洲低收入国家的政府和捐助者应合作设计有效的方法,以确保TDA应针对直接促进增长的部门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
FORUM FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
FORUM FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Forum for Development Studies was established in 1974, and soon became the leading Norwegian journal for development research. While this position has been consolidated, Forum has gradually become an international journal, with its main constituency in the Nordic countries. The journal is owned by the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI) and the Norwegian Association for Development Research. Forum aims to be a platform for development research broadly defined – including the social sciences, economics, history and law. All articles are double-blind peer-reviewed. In order to maintain the journal as a meeting place for different disciplines, we encourage authors to communicate across disciplinary boundaries. Contributions that limit the use of exclusive terminology and frame the questions explored in ways that are accessible to the whole range of the Journal''s readership will be given priority.
期刊最新文献
A Quest for State Contracts: Public Procurement and the Shaping of Competitiveness in Development Consulting Bridging the Divides? How Christian Faith-Based Antitrafficking Organizations Construct Co-Ownership in Buddhist South-East Asia The Current Role of Western Development Actors as Knowledge and Policy Providers: The Making of Good Governance of Natural Gas Resources in Tanzania Welfare Goes Global: Making progress and catching up Power, Politics, and the Supernatural: Exploring the Role of Witchcraft Beliefs in Governance for Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1