Dicamba residue persistence in processing tomato

IF 2.1 2区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Weed Science Pub Date : 2022-08-15 DOI:10.1017/wsc.2022.46
S. Meyers, JEAN-MARIE ARANa, Brandi C. Woolam, Nathaly Vargas, Laura Rodriguez, Luz Cardona
{"title":"Dicamba residue persistence in processing tomato","authors":"S. Meyers, JEAN-MARIE ARANa, Brandi C. Woolam, Nathaly Vargas, Laura Rodriguez, Luz Cardona","doi":"10.1017/wsc.2022.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract There is zero tolerance for dicamba and dicamba metabolite residue in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit following exposure to dicamba. Field trials were conducted in 2020 and 2021 to determine the persistence of dicamba and metabolite (5-hydroxy dicamba and 3,6-dichlor-osalicylic acid [DCSA]) residue in processing tomato shoots and fruits. Dicamba was applied 49 d after transplanting at 0, 0.53, 5.3, and 53 g ae ha–1. Tomato plants were harvested 5, 10, 20, 40, and 61 d after treatment (DAT). No 5-hydroxy dicamba was recovered from any sample. In 2020, the DCSA metabolite was detected from tomato shoot tissue when dicamba was applied at the 53 g ha–1 rate at 0 (14 µg kg–1), 5 (3 µg kg–1), and 20 DAT (5 µg kg–1) and from tomato fruit tissue at 53 g ha–1 at 20 (2 µg kg–1) and 61 DAT (2 µg kg–1). In 2021, DCSA was not detected from tomato shoot or fruit tissues at any harvest date. By 5 DAT, dicamba was only detected from tomato shoot tissues treated with 53 g ha–1. At 0 DAT, dicamba residue was detectable only from tomato fruit on plants treated with 53 g ha–1. Tomato fruit dicamba residue from plants treated with 5.3 g ha–1 had a predicted peak of 19 µg kg–1 at 11.3 DAT. Tomato fruit dicamba residue from plants treated with 53 g ha–1 decreased from 164 to 8 µg kg–1 from 5 to 61 DAT. Furthermore, this study confirms that dicamba is detectable from tomato fruits at 61 DAT following exposure to 5.3 or 53 g ha–1 dicamba. Growers who suspect dicamba exposure should include tomato fruit tissue with their collected sample or sample tomato fruits separately.","PeriodicalId":23688,"journal":{"name":"Weed Science","volume":"70 1","pages":"603 - 609"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weed Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2022.46","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract There is zero tolerance for dicamba and dicamba metabolite residue in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit following exposure to dicamba. Field trials were conducted in 2020 and 2021 to determine the persistence of dicamba and metabolite (5-hydroxy dicamba and 3,6-dichlor-osalicylic acid [DCSA]) residue in processing tomato shoots and fruits. Dicamba was applied 49 d after transplanting at 0, 0.53, 5.3, and 53 g ae ha–1. Tomato plants were harvested 5, 10, 20, 40, and 61 d after treatment (DAT). No 5-hydroxy dicamba was recovered from any sample. In 2020, the DCSA metabolite was detected from tomato shoot tissue when dicamba was applied at the 53 g ha–1 rate at 0 (14 µg kg–1), 5 (3 µg kg–1), and 20 DAT (5 µg kg–1) and from tomato fruit tissue at 53 g ha–1 at 20 (2 µg kg–1) and 61 DAT (2 µg kg–1). In 2021, DCSA was not detected from tomato shoot or fruit tissues at any harvest date. By 5 DAT, dicamba was only detected from tomato shoot tissues treated with 53 g ha–1. At 0 DAT, dicamba residue was detectable only from tomato fruit on plants treated with 53 g ha–1. Tomato fruit dicamba residue from plants treated with 5.3 g ha–1 had a predicted peak of 19 µg kg–1 at 11.3 DAT. Tomato fruit dicamba residue from plants treated with 53 g ha–1 decreased from 164 to 8 µg kg–1 from 5 to 61 DAT. Furthermore, this study confirms that dicamba is detectable from tomato fruits at 61 DAT following exposure to 5.3 or 53 g ha–1 dicamba. Growers who suspect dicamba exposure should include tomato fruit tissue with their collected sample or sample tomato fruits separately.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
番茄加工中麦草畏残留的持久性
摘要番茄(Solanum lycopersicum L.)果实在接触麦草畏后对麦草畏及其代谢产物残留具有零耐受性。2020年和2021年进行了实地试验,以确定麦草畏及其代谢物(5-羟基麦草畏和3,6-二氯-水杨酸[DCSA])残留在番茄芽和果实加工中的持久性。麦草畏在移植后49天分别以0、0.53、5.3和53 g ae ha–1施用。番茄植株在处理(DAT)后5、10、20、40和61天收获。没有从任何样品中回收5-羟基麦草畏。2020年,当麦草畏以53 g ha–1的剂量0(14µg kg–1)、5(3µg kg-1)和20 DAT(5µg kg-1)施用时,从番茄地上部组织中检测到DCSA代谢产物,并以53 g ha-1的剂量20(2µg kg?1)和61 DAT。2021年,在任何收获日期,都没有从番茄茎或果实组织中检测到DCSA。通过5 DAT,麦草畏仅从用53 g ha–1处理的番茄茎组织中检测到。在0 DAT时,麦草畏残留仅可从用53 g ha–1处理的植物上的番茄果实中检测到。用5.3 g ha–1处理的植物的番茄果实麦草畏残留物在11.3 DAT时的预测峰值为19µg kg–1。用53 g ha–1处理的植物的番茄果实麦草畏残留物从164µg kg–1降至8µg kg-1,从5 DAT降至61 DAT。此外,这项研究证实,在暴露于5.3或53 g ha–1麦草畏后,在61 DAT的番茄果实中可以检测到麦草畏。怀疑接触麦草畏的种植者应将番茄果实组织与他们收集的样本或单独对番茄果实进行采样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Weed Science
Weed Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Weed Science publishes original research and scholarship in the form of peer-reviewed articles focused on fundamental research directly related to all aspects of weed science in agricultural systems. Topics for Weed Science include: - the biology and ecology of weeds in agricultural, forestry, aquatic, turf, recreational, rights-of-way and other settings, genetics of weeds - herbicide resistance, chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and molecular action of herbicides and plant growth regulators used to manage undesirable vegetation - ecology of cropping and other agricultural systems as they relate to weed management - biological and ecological aspects of weed control tools including biological agents, and herbicide resistant crops - effect of weed management on soil, air and water.
期刊最新文献
Adaptations in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum) flowering time, Part 1: Individual-based modeling of a polygenic trait Smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) and unresolved Amaranthus spp. from Brazil resistant to glyphosate exhibit the EPSPS TAP-IVS substitution A Systematic Review of Chemical Weed Management in Peanut (Arachis hypogea) in the United States: Challenges and Opportunities Breeding allelopathy in cereal rye for weed suppression A hydrothermal model to predict Russian thistle (Salsola tragus) seedling emergence in the dryland of the Pacific Northwest (USA)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1