Fate of minor lower limb varicosities after Endovenous Thermal Ablation in patients with lower limb Varicose veins with incompetent Sapheno-femoral Junction

IF 0.1 Q4 SURGERY Egyptian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.4103/ejs.ejs_74_23
A. Fathy, Emad El-din Hussein, Mohammed Ahmed Ismail, Mostafa Ismail Mohamed Abd Allah, Islam Mohamed Soliman Atta
{"title":"Fate of minor lower limb varicosities after Endovenous Thermal Ablation in patients with lower limb Varicose veins with incompetent Sapheno-femoral Junction","authors":"A. Fathy, Emad El-din Hussein, Mohammed Ahmed Ismail, Mostafa Ismail Mohamed Abd Allah, Islam Mohamed Soliman Atta","doi":"10.4103/ejs.ejs_74_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives This was an open-label randomized comparative two arms study to assess the efficacy and clinical outcome of endovenous thermal ablation on reticular veins and telangiectasias in patients with lower limbs varicose veins with incompetent Sapheno-femoral Junction. Patients and methods A total of 40 patients [15 (37.5%) males and 25 (62.5%) females] with reflux of the long saphenous vein were subjected to radiofrequency ablation (RFA). 20 patients had RFA alone while the other 20 patients underwent RFA and injection sclerotherapy. Then patients were followed up on 1 week after the procedure, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year by duplex and clinically using venous clinical severity score. Results There were 37.5% males and 62.5% females. There was a statistically significant difference in both groups regarding patients’ symptoms (pain, heaviness, and swelling) before and after serial times of follow-up, which was assessed by the VCSS, denoting marked improvement of patients’ symptoms. Also, there was a statistically significant difference (P<0.001) concerning duplex results regards the reflux before and following RFA. Reticular veins follow-up, we found that in group A they were present among 35% of patients on 1-week follow-up. This increased to reach 70% after 1 year of follow-up, however, in group B they were absent among all patients on 1 week follow-up. They were present among 15% of patients after 1 year of follow-up. Conclusion RFA with concomitant sclerotherapy for the associated minor veins have proved to be safe, cost-effective and more patient satisfaction than RFA without concomitant sclerotherapy.","PeriodicalId":43393,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Surgery","volume":"42 1","pages":"509 - 515"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejs.ejs_74_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives This was an open-label randomized comparative two arms study to assess the efficacy and clinical outcome of endovenous thermal ablation on reticular veins and telangiectasias in patients with lower limbs varicose veins with incompetent Sapheno-femoral Junction. Patients and methods A total of 40 patients [15 (37.5%) males and 25 (62.5%) females] with reflux of the long saphenous vein were subjected to radiofrequency ablation (RFA). 20 patients had RFA alone while the other 20 patients underwent RFA and injection sclerotherapy. Then patients were followed up on 1 week after the procedure, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year by duplex and clinically using venous clinical severity score. Results There were 37.5% males and 62.5% females. There was a statistically significant difference in both groups regarding patients’ symptoms (pain, heaviness, and swelling) before and after serial times of follow-up, which was assessed by the VCSS, denoting marked improvement of patients’ symptoms. Also, there was a statistically significant difference (P<0.001) concerning duplex results regards the reflux before and following RFA. Reticular veins follow-up, we found that in group A they were present among 35% of patients on 1-week follow-up. This increased to reach 70% after 1 year of follow-up, however, in group B they were absent among all patients on 1 week follow-up. They were present among 15% of patients after 1 year of follow-up. Conclusion RFA with concomitant sclerotherapy for the associated minor veins have proved to be safe, cost-effective and more patient satisfaction than RFA without concomitant sclerotherapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下肢隐股交界处功能不全的下肢静脉曲张患者静脉内热消融后轻度下肢静脉曲张的命运
目的:本研究是一项开放标签随机对照两组研究,旨在评估静脉内热消融治疗网状静脉和毛细血管扩张患者伴下肢隐股交界处功能不全静脉曲张的疗效和临床结果。对40例长隐静脉返流患者(男15例(37.5%),女25例(62.5%))行射频消融术(RFA)。20例患者单独接受RFA治疗,另外20例患者同时接受RFA和注射硬化治疗。分别于术后1周、3个月、6个月、1年采用双工法和临床静脉临床严重程度评分法进行随访。结果男性占37.5%,女性占62.5%。两组患者连续随访前后的症状(疼痛、沉重感、肿胀)用VCSS评定,差异有统计学意义,患者症状明显改善。此外,RFA前后反流的双结果也有统计学意义(P<0.001)。网状静脉的随访,我们发现在A组中35%的患者在1周的随访中都有。随访1年后,这一比例增加到70%,但在B组,随访1周时,所有患者均未出现这种情况。随访1年后,15%的患者出现了这些症状。结论RFA联合硬化治疗相关小静脉比RFA不联合硬化治疗安全、经济、患者满意度高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The use of bipolar pure cut mode technology in dissection of parotid tumors: A novel technique Outcomes of thermal ablation combined with u/s guided foam sclerotherapy in treatment of superficial venous reflux in patients with postphlebitic venous leg ulcer The effect of immediate postoperative increase in blood flow velocity in predicting maturation of arteriovenous fistula for dialysis Comparative study between anterior and posterior approach in emergent femoral hernia Prediction of common bile duct stones in acute cholecystitis patients at time of hospital admission
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1