The effect of static passive stretching on a bench press, in one maximum repetition test performance, is independent of the level of flexibility

Vanessa Lima, Iara Bezerra Diniz, Jonathan Moreira Lopes
{"title":"The effect of static passive stretching on a bench press, in one maximum repetition test performance, is independent of the level of flexibility","authors":"Vanessa Lima, Iara Bezerra Diniz, Jonathan Moreira Lopes","doi":"10.33155/J.RAMD.2020.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate at different levels of flexibility the influence of static passive stretching on bench press one maximum repetition test. \nMethod: Eleven men (26.09 ± 4.2 years, 81.69 ± 13.94 kg, 1.70 ± 0.05 m) were evaluated in flexibility using Flexitest and goniometry test classified according to their flexibility levels (small and upper middle levels) and joint range of motion (deficit levels), as well as performed the one maximum repetition test in the following experimental protocols: without previous stretching and with stretching 10, 20 and 60 seconds before the test. \nResults: The results indicate that 64% demonstrated a low level of flexibility and 36% with a higher average level. In both, there was no significant difference in load: A0s (72.43 ± 21.10Kg vs 66.25 ± 19.02Kg); A10s (72.29 ± 20.25Kg vs 67.25 ± 20.35Kg); A20s (73.43 ± 20.78Kg vs 67.75 ± 18.23Kg) and A60s (73.29 ± 19.35Kg vs 68 ± 19.25Kg). ANOVA for repeated measures showed that no significantly different the maximum strength between groups the protocols of static passive stretching tested. \nConclusion: It was concluded that passive static stretching times lower than 60 seconds, in accordance with the current recommendations, do not interfere in the neuromuscular performance of men in the one maximum repetition test, in the bench press independent of their level of flexibility.","PeriodicalId":39297,"journal":{"name":"Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33155/J.RAMD.2020.04.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate at different levels of flexibility the influence of static passive stretching on bench press one maximum repetition test. Method: Eleven men (26.09 ± 4.2 years, 81.69 ± 13.94 kg, 1.70 ± 0.05 m) were evaluated in flexibility using Flexitest and goniometry test classified according to their flexibility levels (small and upper middle levels) and joint range of motion (deficit levels), as well as performed the one maximum repetition test in the following experimental protocols: without previous stretching and with stretching 10, 20 and 60 seconds before the test. Results: The results indicate that 64% demonstrated a low level of flexibility and 36% with a higher average level. In both, there was no significant difference in load: A0s (72.43 ± 21.10Kg vs 66.25 ± 19.02Kg); A10s (72.29 ± 20.25Kg vs 67.25 ± 20.35Kg); A20s (73.43 ± 20.78Kg vs 67.75 ± 18.23Kg) and A60s (73.29 ± 19.35Kg vs 68 ± 19.25Kg). ANOVA for repeated measures showed that no significantly different the maximum strength between groups the protocols of static passive stretching tested. Conclusion: It was concluded that passive static stretching times lower than 60 seconds, in accordance with the current recommendations, do not interfere in the neuromuscular performance of men in the one maximum repetition test, in the bench press independent of their level of flexibility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一次最大重复测试性能中,台式压力机上静态被动拉伸的效果与灵活性水平无关
目的:本研究的目的是研究不同柔韧性水平下静态被动拉伸对卧推一次最大重复试验的影响。方法:对11名男性(26.09±4.2岁,81.69±13.94 kg,1.70±0.05 m)的柔韧性进行了评估,并根据其柔韧性水平(小和中上水平)和关节活动范围(缺陷水平)进行了分类,以及在以下实验方案中进行了一次最大重复测试:没有之前的拉伸,在测试前10、20和60秒进行拉伸。结果:结果表明,64%的人表现出较低的灵活性水平,36%的人表现为较高的平均水平。两者在负荷方面无显著差异:A0(72.43±21.10Kg vs 66.25±19.02Kg);A10s(72.29±20.25Kg vs 67.25±20.35Kg);A20s(73.43±20.78Kg vs 67.75±18.23Kg)和A60s(73.29±19.35Kg vs 68±19.25Kg)。重复测量的方差分析显示,静态被动拉伸方案测试的组间最大强度没有显著差异。结论:根据目前的建议,低于60秒的被动静态拉伸时间不会干扰男性在一次最大重复测试中的神经肌肉表现,在卧推中,与他们的柔韧性水平无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte
Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: El Centro Andaluz de Medicina del Deporte edita la Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte (RAMD) desde 2008 con periodicidad trimestral. Esta revista científica publica artículos originales de investigación, previamente sujetos a un proceso de selección y evaluación por pares, y constituye un foro para los científicos, especialistas y profesionales cuyas actividades están relacionadas con la actividad física, el deporte y la salud. Debido a la naturaleza multidisciplinaria de esta área, la revista cubre diferentes disciplinas relacionadas todas con la Medicina del Deporte, lo que la convierte en una publicación con un altísimo grado de interés para todos los profesionales relacionados con las Ciencias del Deporte.
期刊最新文献
II Congreso Internacional en Tecnología en la Actividad Física y el Deporte. TAPAS 2021. 22-23 Noviembre 2021 The effect of a core training program on jump performance in female handball players Acute effects of swimming aerobic exercise on contractility and intracellular calcium handling in isolated right ventricular cardiomyocytes Odontocrexis Conclusiones de las X Jornadas del grupo Avilés sobre Medicina del Deporte 6-7 de Septiembre de 2021 (León)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1