Soil organic carbon changes in a Carolina Bay wetland 15 years after restoration

Christopher M. Moritz, Michael J. Vepraskas, Matthew C. Ricker
{"title":"Soil organic carbon changes in a Carolina Bay wetland 15 years after restoration","authors":"Christopher M. Moritz,&nbsp;Michael J. Vepraskas,&nbsp;Matthew C. Ricker","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Evaluating wetland restoration success is complicated. In this study, soil organic carbon (SOC) pools in a Carolina Bay wetland (CBW) were determined for pre- and post-restoration periods and compared to values in reference wetlands to determine if SOC could be used to evaluate restoration success. The CBW was Juniper Bay in Robeson County, NC, USA, that had been restored for 15 years following its use for agriculture. Previously, we determined both pre-restoration SOCs and post-restoration hydrology. Saturation occurrence and anaerobic conditions (15 years following restoration) were confirmed with Indicator of Reduction in Soils (IRIS) tubes. Soil morphological features, litter thickness, and SOC to 75 cm were also determined. There were significant (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) differences in numbers of hydric soil field indicators in the organic soils and no differences in the mineral soils (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.10) between pre- and post-restoration periods. Litter thickness post-restoration increased linearly with saturation duration. SOC decreased following restoration by 49% in mineral soils and 24% in organic soils as compared to pre-restoration values. SOC concentrations in the restored wetland were not significantly different than those in reference wetlands indicating that the Juniper Bay restoration was successfully sequestering C. Litter thickness may be a good indicator of restoration success. SOC levels may decrease compared to reference wetland values if pre-restoration soils were in agriculture.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"87 3","pages":"696-706"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20521","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluating wetland restoration success is complicated. In this study, soil organic carbon (SOC) pools in a Carolina Bay wetland (CBW) were determined for pre- and post-restoration periods and compared to values in reference wetlands to determine if SOC could be used to evaluate restoration success. The CBW was Juniper Bay in Robeson County, NC, USA, that had been restored for 15 years following its use for agriculture. Previously, we determined both pre-restoration SOCs and post-restoration hydrology. Saturation occurrence and anaerobic conditions (15 years following restoration) were confirmed with Indicator of Reduction in Soils (IRIS) tubes. Soil morphological features, litter thickness, and SOC to 75 cm were also determined. There were significant (p < 0.05) differences in numbers of hydric soil field indicators in the organic soils and no differences in the mineral soils (p > 0.10) between pre- and post-restoration periods. Litter thickness post-restoration increased linearly with saturation duration. SOC decreased following restoration by 49% in mineral soils and 24% in organic soils as compared to pre-restoration values. SOC concentrations in the restored wetland were not significantly different than those in reference wetlands indicating that the Juniper Bay restoration was successfully sequestering C. Litter thickness may be a good indicator of restoration success. SOC levels may decrease compared to reference wetland values if pre-restoration soils were in agriculture.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡罗莱纳湾湿地恢复15年后土壤有机碳的变化
评估湿地恢复的成功是复杂的。本研究测定了卡罗莱纳湾湿地(CBW)恢复前后的土壤有机碳(SOC)库,并与参考湿地进行了比较,以确定是否可以用SOC来评价恢复成功。CBW是美国北卡罗来纳州罗布森县的杜松湾,在用于农业之后已经恢复了15年。之前,我们确定了修复前的soc和修复后的水文。饱和度的发生和厌氧条件(修复后15年)用土壤还原指示剂(IRIS)管确认。测定了土壤形态特征、凋落物厚度和75 cm土壤有机碳。p <;0.05)有机土壤水田指标数量差异显著,矿质土壤水田指标数量差异不显著(p >;0.10),介于恢复前后。恢复后凋落物厚度随饱和持续时间线性增加。与恢复前相比,恢复后矿质土壤的有机碳含量下降了49%,有机土壤的有机碳含量下降了24%。恢复湿地的有机碳浓度与参考湿地没有显著差异,表明杉木湾恢复成功地封存了c。凋落物厚度可能是恢复成功的一个很好的指标。与参考湿地值相比,如果恢复前土壤用于农业,其有机碳水平可能会下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Soil carbon fraction responses to grazing intensity and texture in a semiarid grassland Investigating plasticity and swelling properties of improved expansive soil designs based on hybrid deep learning optimization for high pay load applications Integrated assessment of potassium speciation in Taiwanese soils using chemical extraction and X-ray absorption spectroscopy Comparison of Laboratory- and field-determined soil water retention curves in a well-aggregated tallgrass prairie soil A Green-Ampt model for muddy water considering air resistance based on the layered assumption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1