Managing the dynamic change of organizational knowledge base in collaboration networks

IF 2.4 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Baltic Journal of Management Pub Date : 2022-03-18 DOI:10.1108/bjm-09-2021-0333
Jingbei Wang, Yafei Nie
{"title":"Managing the dynamic change of organizational knowledge base in collaboration networks","authors":"Jingbei Wang, Yafei Nie","doi":"10.1108/bjm-09-2021-0333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposePrevious studies have addressed the importance of knowledge base and its effect on innovation outputs. However, few studies have focused on the antecedents of dynamic changes of the organizational knowledge base. This study aims to shed light on the antecedents of dynamic change of the organizational knowledge base by examining how network centrality in an organization's collaboration network impacts this change and the moderating role of knowledge network cohesion.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical setting of this study is the smartphone collaboration network. The authors selected patent data from the Derwent Innovation Database. A negative binomial model was used to test the hypotheses.FindingsThe results verified that network centrality has a positive effect on the change in coupling among existing knowledge domains and has an inverted U-shaped relationship with the coupling between new and existing knowledge domains. Furthermore, when local cohesion is high, network centrality has a stronger positive effect on the change in coupling among existing knowledge domains. Global cohesion moderates this process in such a way that when it is at a high level, the coupling between new and existing knowledge domains can benefit more from a moderate level of network centrality.Originality/valueThis study sheds light on the antecedents of dynamic change of the organizational knowledge base and links the literature on collaboration and knowledge networks by providing novel insights to match collaboration network centrality with knowledge network cohesion for successful improvement of the organizational knowledge base.","PeriodicalId":46829,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Journal of Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bjm-09-2021-0333","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposePrevious studies have addressed the importance of knowledge base and its effect on innovation outputs. However, few studies have focused on the antecedents of dynamic changes of the organizational knowledge base. This study aims to shed light on the antecedents of dynamic change of the organizational knowledge base by examining how network centrality in an organization's collaboration network impacts this change and the moderating role of knowledge network cohesion.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical setting of this study is the smartphone collaboration network. The authors selected patent data from the Derwent Innovation Database. A negative binomial model was used to test the hypotheses.FindingsThe results verified that network centrality has a positive effect on the change in coupling among existing knowledge domains and has an inverted U-shaped relationship with the coupling between new and existing knowledge domains. Furthermore, when local cohesion is high, network centrality has a stronger positive effect on the change in coupling among existing knowledge domains. Global cohesion moderates this process in such a way that when it is at a high level, the coupling between new and existing knowledge domains can benefit more from a moderate level of network centrality.Originality/valueThis study sheds light on the antecedents of dynamic change of the organizational knowledge base and links the literature on collaboration and knowledge networks by providing novel insights to match collaboration network centrality with knowledge network cohesion for successful improvement of the organizational knowledge base.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
协作网络中组织知识库的动态变化管理
目的以往的研究都探讨了知识库的重要性及其对创新产出的影响。然而,很少有研究关注组织知识库动态变化的前因。本研究旨在通过考察组织协作网络中的网络中心性如何影响组织知识库的动态变化以及知识网络凝聚力的调节作用,揭示组织知识库动态变化的前因。设计/方法论/方法本研究的实证背景是智能手机协作网络。作者从德温特创新数据库中选择了专利数据。一个负二项模型被用来检验这些假设。结果表明,网络中心性对现有知识域之间的耦合变化有积极影响,并且与新知识域和现有知识域的耦合呈倒U型关系。此外,当局部内聚性高时,网络中心性对现有知识域之间耦合的变化具有更强的正向影响。全球凝聚力以这样一种方式调节这一过程,即当它处于高水平时,新知识领域和现有知识领域之间的耦合可以从中等水平的网络中心性中受益更多。原创性/价值本研究揭示了组织知识库动态变化的前因,并通过提供新的见解将协作网络中心性与知识网络凝聚力相匹配,将协作和知识网络的文献联系起来,以成功改进组织知识库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.70%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Baltic region has experienced rapid political and economic change over recent years. The challenges to managers and management researchers operating within the area are often different to those experienced in other parts of the world. The Baltic Journal of Management contributes to an understanding of different management cultures and provides readers with a fresh look at emerging management practices and research in the countries of the Baltic region and beyond.
期刊最新文献
Age-friendly human resource practices: a comparison of Baltic and Nordic countries Validation of a dispositional critical thinking scale using an original analytical methodology for addressing data from Google Trends Affective states and a firm’s performance: the mediating role of dynamic managerial capabilities Unmasking supplier greenwashing: how information sharing and green trust shape clients’ sustainability Authentic and laissez-faire leadership as drivers of employees well-being: the moderating role of resilience and self-efficacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1