Book Review: Practical Sacramental Theology: At the Intersection of Liturgy and Ethics

IF 0.2 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION Irish Theological Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-04-09 DOI:10.1177/00211400221085759a
Liam M. Tracey
{"title":"Book Review: Practical Sacramental Theology: At the Intersection of Liturgy and Ethics","authors":"Liam M. Tracey","doi":"10.1177/00211400221085759a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"passing recognition that the gun culture identity that is being critiqued (I think rightly) applies to ‘some gun owners at least’ or a ‘subgroup of fellow gun owners’ (p. 126) and that most perhaps truly intend for the gun to be used only for protection. His major concern that even such gun owners have had their imaginations habituated in ways at odds with the gospel is valid, too. However, his writing at times strikes me as unfair, as when he attributes other motives to Christian gun owners: that they subscribe to a narrative ‘that enshrines a violent hero who overthrows the evildoers with a superior display of marksmanship’ (p. 120), that they seek ‘retaliation’ (p. 121) and ‘retributive payback’ (p. 122), and that they harbor ‘fantasized anger toward an other’ (p. 128). The Afterword by Crouch and Hays succinctly urges Christians to answer Jeremiah’s call to ‘seek the peace (shalom) of the city’ (Jer. 29:7), and that this entails not only regulating and reducing guns, but more positively, to pursue the provision of better education, housing, mental health care, and other needs towards the promotion of the common good. I agree. Unfortunately, their book missed an opportunity to forge a greater alliance with most Christians who are not pacifists but who nevertheless agree that guns pose a clear and present danger to gun owners and their loved ones, fellow citizens, and the common good. Many Christians, myself included, who think that armed force may sometimes be morally justified—even obligated on the part of public authorities—also support stricter regulations of firearms if not, ultimately, their absolute abolition.","PeriodicalId":55939,"journal":{"name":"Irish Theological Quarterly","volume":"87 1","pages":"168 - 172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Theological Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00211400221085759a","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

passing recognition that the gun culture identity that is being critiqued (I think rightly) applies to ‘some gun owners at least’ or a ‘subgroup of fellow gun owners’ (p. 126) and that most perhaps truly intend for the gun to be used only for protection. His major concern that even such gun owners have had their imaginations habituated in ways at odds with the gospel is valid, too. However, his writing at times strikes me as unfair, as when he attributes other motives to Christian gun owners: that they subscribe to a narrative ‘that enshrines a violent hero who overthrows the evildoers with a superior display of marksmanship’ (p. 120), that they seek ‘retaliation’ (p. 121) and ‘retributive payback’ (p. 122), and that they harbor ‘fantasized anger toward an other’ (p. 128). The Afterword by Crouch and Hays succinctly urges Christians to answer Jeremiah’s call to ‘seek the peace (shalom) of the city’ (Jer. 29:7), and that this entails not only regulating and reducing guns, but more positively, to pursue the provision of better education, housing, mental health care, and other needs towards the promotion of the common good. I agree. Unfortunately, their book missed an opportunity to forge a greater alliance with most Christians who are not pacifists but who nevertheless agree that guns pose a clear and present danger to gun owners and their loved ones, fellow citizens, and the common good. Many Christians, myself included, who think that armed force may sometimes be morally justified—even obligated on the part of public authorities—also support stricter regulations of firearms if not, ultimately, their absolute abolition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:实用圣礼神学:在礼仪与伦理的交叉
通过承认正在受到批评的枪支文化认同(我认为是正确的)适用于“至少一些枪支拥有者”或“枪支拥有者的一小部分”(第126页),并且大多数人可能真正打算将枪支仅用于保护。他主要担心的是,即使是这样的枪支拥有者,他们的想象力也习惯了与福音不符的方式,这也是合理的。然而,他的写作有时让我觉得不公平,因为他把其他动机归咎于基督徒持枪者:他们赞同一种叙事,“颂扬一个暴力英雄,他用高超的枪法推翻了坏人”(第120页),他们寻求“报复”(第121页)和“报复的回报”(第122页),他们怀有“对他人的幻想愤怒”(第128页)。克劳奇和海斯的《后记》简洁地敦促基督徒回应耶利米的号召,“寻求城市的和平(shalom)”(耶29:7),这不仅需要规范和减少枪支,而且更积极地追求更好的教育,住房,心理健康护理和其他需求,以促进共同利益。我同意。不幸的是,他们的书错过了与大多数基督徒建立更大联盟的机会,这些基督徒不是和平主义者,但他们同意枪支对枪支拥有者及其亲人,同胞和共同利益构成了明确而现实的危险。许多基督徒,包括我自己,认为武装力量有时在道德上是正当的——甚至是公共当局的义务——也支持对枪支实行更严格的管制,如果不是最终完全废除的话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Interpreting Mk 5: 25–34 in Solidarity with Women Who Have Experienced Pregnancy Loss Marrying Body and Theology: A Response to Thomas Finegan Book Review: Journeys of the Mind: A Life in History Is Pope Francis’s Social Teaching Post-Cardijn? The Judgment of the Nations: Structural Sin, Social Ontology, and Social Eschatology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1