Functional outcomes in youth with complex trauma: a systematic review of psychosocial interventions

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Australian Psychologist Pub Date : 2023-05-04 DOI:10.1080/00050067.2023.2206513
Braden J. Dunn, J. Paterson, Carol A. Keane
{"title":"Functional outcomes in youth with complex trauma: a systematic review of psychosocial interventions","authors":"Braden J. Dunn, J. Paterson, Carol A. Keane","doi":"10.1080/00050067.2023.2206513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective Young people with complex trauma typically experience numerous psychosocial and functional impairments. Differing models exist for measuring and determining mental health recovery from complex trauma, but those emphasising functional change may be underrepresented. Method Four databases were searched (Web of Science, CINAHL Complete, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library) for studies published between 2010 and 2021 to identify and summarise existing psychosocial interventions and their impact on quality of life, occupational activity, risk behaviour and/or use of psychiatric emergency services. One primary reviewer conducted the study with the assistance of two senior reviewers. The results are presented in the form of a narrative synthesis. Results Over 12,000 studies were examined. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Four functional outcomes were reported in the literature – Quality of Life, occupational functioning, self-harm, and suicidal ideation. Results were inconsistent regarding improvements in functional outcomes with treatment. All interventions were effective in reducing posttraumatic stress. Conclusions Few intervention studies report on functional outcomes. Interventions described in this paper may have potential to improve functioning in young people with complex trauma but research in this area is limited. Future researchers are encouraged to include measures of functional change alongside traditional symptom reports. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: (1) Young people who experience complex trauma are more likely to experience delays in psychosocial development and barriers to occupational participation. (2) Psychosocial interventions are effective in reducing the consequences of complex traumatic stress reactions such as complex PTSD. (3) Youth consumer-driven recovery models are in early development. What this topic adds: (1) Traditional concepts of recovery remain predominant in intervention research. Transitioning to consumer-driven recovery models is lagging. (2) It is not clear if current interventions for PTSD/complex PTSD in youth have any impact on Quality of Life, frequency of psychiatric crises or occupational activity. (3) There are few solutions for practitioners or service designers seeking functional improvement for youth with complex trauma and complex PTSD.","PeriodicalId":47679,"journal":{"name":"Australian Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2023.2206513","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective Young people with complex trauma typically experience numerous psychosocial and functional impairments. Differing models exist for measuring and determining mental health recovery from complex trauma, but those emphasising functional change may be underrepresented. Method Four databases were searched (Web of Science, CINAHL Complete, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library) for studies published between 2010 and 2021 to identify and summarise existing psychosocial interventions and their impact on quality of life, occupational activity, risk behaviour and/or use of psychiatric emergency services. One primary reviewer conducted the study with the assistance of two senior reviewers. The results are presented in the form of a narrative synthesis. Results Over 12,000 studies were examined. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Four functional outcomes were reported in the literature – Quality of Life, occupational functioning, self-harm, and suicidal ideation. Results were inconsistent regarding improvements in functional outcomes with treatment. All interventions were effective in reducing posttraumatic stress. Conclusions Few intervention studies report on functional outcomes. Interventions described in this paper may have potential to improve functioning in young people with complex trauma but research in this area is limited. Future researchers are encouraged to include measures of functional change alongside traditional symptom reports. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: (1) Young people who experience complex trauma are more likely to experience delays in psychosocial development and barriers to occupational participation. (2) Psychosocial interventions are effective in reducing the consequences of complex traumatic stress reactions such as complex PTSD. (3) Youth consumer-driven recovery models are in early development. What this topic adds: (1) Traditional concepts of recovery remain predominant in intervention research. Transitioning to consumer-driven recovery models is lagging. (2) It is not clear if current interventions for PTSD/complex PTSD in youth have any impact on Quality of Life, frequency of psychiatric crises or occupational activity. (3) There are few solutions for practitioners or service designers seeking functional improvement for youth with complex trauma and complex PTSD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复杂创伤青年的功能结果:心理社会干预的系统综述
【摘要】目的复杂创伤的年轻人通常会经历许多社会心理和功能障碍。衡量和确定复杂创伤后的心理健康恢复存在不同的模型,但那些强调功能变化的模型可能代表性不足。方法检索2010年至2021年间发表的四个数据库(Web of Science、CINAHL Complete、MEDLINE和Cochrane Library),以确定和总结现有的社会心理干预措施及其对生活质量、职业活动、风险行为和/或精神科急诊服务使用的影响。一名初级审稿人在两名高级审稿人的协助下进行了这项研究。结果以叙事综合的形式呈现。结果超过12000项研究被检查。8项研究符合纳入标准。文献中报道了四种功能结局——生活质量、职业功能、自残和自杀意念。治疗后功能结果的改善结果不一致。所有干预措施均能有效减少创伤后应激。结论很少有干预研究报道功能结局。本文中描述的干预措施可能有潜力改善患有复杂创伤的年轻人的功能,但这一领域的研究有限。未来的研究人员被鼓励在传统的症状报告中加入功能变化的测量。(1)经历过复杂创伤的年轻人更有可能出现心理社会发展迟缓和职业参与障碍。(2)心理社会干预在减少复杂创伤应激反应(如复杂PTSD)的后果方面是有效的。(3)青年消费驱动型复苏模式尚处于起步阶段。本课题补充的内容:(1)传统的康复概念在干预研究中仍然占主导地位。向消费驱动型经济复苏模式的转变是滞后的。(2)目前尚不清楚对青年PTSD/复杂PTSD的干预是否对生活质量、精神危机频率或职业活动有任何影响。(3)对于寻求复杂创伤和创伤后应激障碍青少年的功能改善的从业者或服务设计师来说,解决方案很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Psychologist
Australian Psychologist PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Australian Psychologist is the official applied practice and public policy journal of the Australian Psychological Society. As such, the journal solicits articles covering current issues in psychology, the science and practice of psychology, and psychology"s contribution to public policy, with particular emphasis on the Australian context. Periodically, Australian Psychological Society documents, including but not limited to, position papers, reports of the Society, ethics information, surveys of the membership, announcements, and selected award addresses may appear in the journal.
期刊最新文献
What counts? A Delphi consensus-based approach to interpreting accreditation standards for Direct Client Activities in clinical psychology and clinical neuropsychology programs Enabling psychologists to address the psychological consequences of cancer Necessary but not sufficient: examination of older adults’ connectedness with their online social contact during COVID-19 Using the temporal motivation theory to explain the relation between ADHD and procrastination Translation and validation of the Swedish version of the Self-Compassion Scale for Youth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1