Peritoneal Dialysis-related Peritonitis: Microbiological Profile and Outcome

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medical Journal of Bakirkoy Pub Date : 2022-03-25 DOI:10.4274/bmj.galenos.2022.2021.12-6
Arzu Özdemir, Sibel Yücel Koçak
{"title":"Peritoneal Dialysis-related Peritonitis: Microbiological Profile and Outcome","authors":"Arzu Özdemir, Sibel Yücel Koçak","doi":"10.4274/bmj.galenos.2022.2021.12-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Peritonitis is a major complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and leads to significant mortality and technical failure. Understanding local peritonitis rates and microbiologic profiles are important for the prevention and appropriate management of PD-related peritonitis. We investigated the incidence rate, causative agents, and outcomes of PD-related peritonitis episodes. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled all patients who were receiving PD and have been treated for PD-related peritonitis between February 2005 and November 2021 in our PD unit. Data of the patients included demographic characteristics, causes of primary renal disease, microbiology, and outcomes (resolution, catheter loss, and death) of peritonitis episodes. Results: During the study period, 143 PD-related peritonitis episodes were identified in 69 patients. The peritonitis rate was 0.56 episodes per patient-year. Overall, 62.9% of the episodes were due to Gram-positive organisms, 32.1% were due to Gram-negative organisms, 3.4% were culture negative and 1.3% were candida. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were isolated in half of the Gram-positive episodes. Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas were the most frequently observed microorganisms among Gram-negative episodes. Overall, 81.1% of cases improved completely with medical treatment. The PD catheter was removed in 27 (18.8%) patients, and two patients died from sepsis. Gram-negative organisms resulted in a significantly higher rate of catheter removals and a lower rate of resolution than Gram-positive organisms (p<0.001). Conclusion: Reducing the incidence of PD-related peritonitis could be possible by knowledge of prevalent microbial agents in each center, adjusting empirical treatment accordingly, and taking the necessary measures to prevent peritonitis attacks.","PeriodicalId":42529,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Bakirkoy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Bakirkoy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/bmj.galenos.2022.2021.12-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Peritonitis is a major complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and leads to significant mortality and technical failure. Understanding local peritonitis rates and microbiologic profiles are important for the prevention and appropriate management of PD-related peritonitis. We investigated the incidence rate, causative agents, and outcomes of PD-related peritonitis episodes. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled all patients who were receiving PD and have been treated for PD-related peritonitis between February 2005 and November 2021 in our PD unit. Data of the patients included demographic characteristics, causes of primary renal disease, microbiology, and outcomes (resolution, catheter loss, and death) of peritonitis episodes. Results: During the study period, 143 PD-related peritonitis episodes were identified in 69 patients. The peritonitis rate was 0.56 episodes per patient-year. Overall, 62.9% of the episodes were due to Gram-positive organisms, 32.1% were due to Gram-negative organisms, 3.4% were culture negative and 1.3% were candida. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were isolated in half of the Gram-positive episodes. Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas were the most frequently observed microorganisms among Gram-negative episodes. Overall, 81.1% of cases improved completely with medical treatment. The PD catheter was removed in 27 (18.8%) patients, and two patients died from sepsis. Gram-negative organisms resulted in a significantly higher rate of catheter removals and a lower rate of resolution than Gram-positive organisms (p<0.001). Conclusion: Reducing the incidence of PD-related peritonitis could be possible by knowledge of prevalent microbial agents in each center, adjusting empirical treatment accordingly, and taking the necessary measures to prevent peritonitis attacks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎:微生物特征和结果
目的:腹膜炎是腹膜透析(PD)的主要并发症,导致严重的死亡率和技术失败。了解局部腹膜炎发生率和微生物特征对pd相关性腹膜炎的预防和适当管理具有重要意义。我们调查了pd相关腹膜炎发作的发生率、病因和结局。方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了2005年2月至2021年11月在我们PD病房接受PD相关腹膜炎治疗的所有患者。患者的资料包括人口统计学特征、原发性肾脏疾病的原因、微生物学和腹膜炎发作的结局(缓解、导管丢失和死亡)。结果:在研究期间,69例患者中发现143例pd相关腹膜炎发作。腹膜炎发生率为0.56次/患者年。革兰氏阳性菌占62.9%,革兰氏阴性菌占32.1%,培养阴性3.4%,念珠菌1.3%。半数革兰氏阳性发作中分离出凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌。革兰氏阴性发作中最常观察到的微生物是不动杆菌和假单胞菌。总体而言,81.1%的病例经药物治疗完全好转。27例(18.8%)患者拔出PD导管,2例患者死于败血症。革兰氏阴性菌的导管拔除率显著高于革兰氏阳性菌,而溶解率显著低于革兰氏阳性菌(p<0.001)。结论:通过了解各中心流行的微生物制剂,相应调整经验性治疗,采取必要措施预防腹膜炎发作,可降低pd相关性腹膜炎的发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Bakirkoy
Medical Journal of Bakirkoy MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Two Different Techniques in Macular Hole Surgery: 12-month Results of Clinical Practice Frequency of Eating Disorders and Associated Factors in Type 1 Diabetic Adolescents The Influence of Sildenafil Versus Resveratrol on the Healing of Colonic Anastomosis: An Experimental Study Erysipelas-like Erythema: A Pathognomonic Rash in Children with Familial Mediterranean Fever The Correlation of Cystic Fibrosis Screening Test Results with Ultrasonographically Detected Fetal Anomalies in Prenatal Diagnosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1