Absolute Lymphocyte Count in Cervical Cancer Patients Prior to Definitive Chemoradiotherapy: a Prognostic Indicator?

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Hong Kong Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2022-12-23 DOI:10.12809/hkjr2217467
Eyh Chuk, J. Chow, K. Cheung, Ssw Tse, R. Ho, H. Wong, Any Yeung, K. Wong
{"title":"Absolute Lymphocyte Count in Cervical Cancer Patients Prior to Definitive Chemoradiotherapy: a Prognostic Indicator?","authors":"Eyh Chuk, J. Chow, K. Cheung, Ssw Tse, R. Ho, H. Wong, Any Yeung, K. Wong","doi":"10.12809/hkjr2217467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Baseline lymphopenia is associated with poor prognosis in various malignancies. This study aimed to examine the prognostic value of pretreatment lymphocyte count in cervical cancer patients in Hong Kong. Methods: A cohort of 198 cases of cervical cancer patients without evidence of metastatic disease (i.e., International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB to IVA), who completed definitive chemoradiotherapy from January 2009 to December 2014 was analysed. Baseline clinical and pretreatment blood test data were collected. Definitive treatment had included external radiotherapy and brachytherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m 2 . Log-rank tests and multivariable Cox regression were used to evaluate the association between haematological parameters and survival. Study endpoints were overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and late radiation-induced grade 3-4 toxicity. Results: Median follow-up period was 6.52 years. A pretreatment absolute lymphocyte count ≤1.7 × 10 9 /L was associated with a significantly worse 5-year OS (68.7% vs. 84.4%, p = 0.005). Multivariate analysis confirmed pretreatment lymphocyte count to be an independent predictor of RFS (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.34-0.99, p = 0.046) and OS (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.25-0.88, p = 0.018). Absolute lymphocyte count was not associated with late grade 3-4 radiation toxicity. Conclusion: Our data in a local cohort add evidence to findings in other studies that pretreatment absolute lymphocyte count is an independent predictor of both OS and RFS in cervical cancer patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy","PeriodicalId":41549,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12809/hkjr2217467","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Baseline lymphopenia is associated with poor prognosis in various malignancies. This study aimed to examine the prognostic value of pretreatment lymphocyte count in cervical cancer patients in Hong Kong. Methods: A cohort of 198 cases of cervical cancer patients without evidence of metastatic disease (i.e., International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB to IVA), who completed definitive chemoradiotherapy from January 2009 to December 2014 was analysed. Baseline clinical and pretreatment blood test data were collected. Definitive treatment had included external radiotherapy and brachytherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m 2 . Log-rank tests and multivariable Cox regression were used to evaluate the association between haematological parameters and survival. Study endpoints were overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and late radiation-induced grade 3-4 toxicity. Results: Median follow-up period was 6.52 years. A pretreatment absolute lymphocyte count ≤1.7 × 10 9 /L was associated with a significantly worse 5-year OS (68.7% vs. 84.4%, p = 0.005). Multivariate analysis confirmed pretreatment lymphocyte count to be an independent predictor of RFS (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.34-0.99, p = 0.046) and OS (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.25-0.88, p = 0.018). Absolute lymphocyte count was not associated with late grade 3-4 radiation toxicity. Conclusion: Our data in a local cohort add evidence to findings in other studies that pretreatment absolute lymphocyte count is an independent predictor of both OS and RFS in cervical cancer patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫颈癌症患者最终化疗前淋巴细胞绝对计数:预后指标?
目的:基线淋巴细胞减少症与各种恶性肿瘤的不良预后有关。本研究旨在探讨香港子宫颈癌症患者预处理淋巴细胞计数的预后价值。方法:对2009年1月至2014年12月完成明确放化疗的198例无转移性疾病证据的癌症宫颈癌患者(即国际妇产科联合会IB至IVA期)进行分析。收集基线临床和预处理血液测试数据。明确的治疗方法包括外照射和近距离放疗,同时每周给予顺铂40mg/m2。对数秩检验和多变量Cox回归用于评估血液学参数与生存率之间的相关性。研究终点为总生存期(OS)、无复发生存期(RFS)和晚期辐射诱导的3-4级毒性。结果:中位随访时间为6.52年。预处理绝对淋巴细胞计数≤1.7×10 9/L与5年OS显著恶化相关(68.7%对84.4%,p=0.005)。多因素分析证实,预处理淋巴细胞计数是RFS(调整后的危险比=0.58;95%置信区间[CI]=0.34-0.99,p=0.046)和OS(调整后危险比=0.47;95%CI=0.25-0.88,p=0.018)的独立预测因子。淋巴细胞绝对计数与晚期3-4级辐射毒性无关。结论:我们在本地队列中的数据为其他研究的结果提供了证据,即在接受明确放化疗的宫颈癌症患者中,预处理绝对淋巴细胞计数是OS和RFS的独立预测因素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hong Kong Journal of Radiology
Hong Kong Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Optimising Risk-based Breast Cancer Screening in Hong Kong Effects of Different Liver Diseases on Metabolic Reference in 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Breast Ductography: A Hidden Diagnostic Gem for Patients with Abnormal Nipple Discharge Sporadic Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformation with a History of Stroke/Cerebrovascular Ischaemia Successfully Treated with Coil Embolisation: Two Case Reports Kaposi Sarcoma of the Ankle Complicated by Emphysematous Osteomyelitis: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1