Perceived Anonymity and Cheating in an Online Experiment

IF 1.3 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Eastern European Economics Pub Date : 2022-09-06 DOI:10.1080/00128775.2022.2114913
E. Denisova-Schmidt, M. Huber, Yaroslav Prytula
{"title":"Perceived Anonymity and Cheating in an Online Experiment","authors":"E. Denisova-Schmidt, M. Huber, Yaroslav Prytula","doi":"10.1080/00128775.2022.2114913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper presents the outcomes of an online coin-tossing experiment evaluating cheating behavior among Ukrainian students. Over 1,500 participants were asked to make ten coin tosses and were randomly assigned to one of the three treatment groups tossing coins (1) online, (2) manually, or (3) having the choice between tossing manually or online. The study outcomes suggest that students are more inclined to cheat when they perceive the coin toss to be more “private.” Moreover, the students’ attitudes toward corruption appear to matter for the extent of their cheating, while socio-demographic characteristics were less important.","PeriodicalId":45883,"journal":{"name":"Eastern European Economics","volume":"60 1","pages":"540 - 558"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eastern European Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2022.2114913","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper presents the outcomes of an online coin-tossing experiment evaluating cheating behavior among Ukrainian students. Over 1,500 participants were asked to make ten coin tosses and were randomly assigned to one of the three treatment groups tossing coins (1) online, (2) manually, or (3) having the choice between tossing manually or online. The study outcomes suggest that students are more inclined to cheat when they perceive the coin toss to be more “private.” Moreover, the students’ attitudes toward corruption appear to matter for the extent of their cheating, while socio-demographic characteristics were less important.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线实验中的感知匿名和作弊
摘要本文介绍了一项在线掷硬币实验的结果,该实验评估了乌克兰学生的作弊行为。1500多名参与者被要求投掷10枚硬币,并被随机分配到三个投掷硬币的治疗组之一(1)在线投掷,(2)手动投掷,或(3)在手动或在线投掷之间做出选择。研究结果表明,当学生认为掷硬币更“私人”时,他们更倾向于作弊。此外,学生对腐败的态度似乎对他们作弊的程度很重要,而社会人口特征则不那么重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Eastern European Economics publishes original research on the newly emerging economies of Central and Eastern Europe, with coverage of the ongoing processes of transition to market economics in different countries, their integration into the broader European and global economies, and the ramifications of the 2008-9 financial crisis. An introduction by the journal"s editor adds context and expert insights on the articles presented in each issue.
期刊最新文献
Is There an Asymmetric Effect Due to Foreign Direct Investment on the Exports of the Manufacturing and Service Sectors of Central, Eastern, and South-Eastern European Countries? Exploring the Dynamics of the Finance-Growth Nexus: Trade Globalization, Business Potential, and Geopolitical Implications in Russian Regions Determinants of Public Debt Dynamics in Transition and Post-Transition Economies An Ensemble Multilabel-Based Analysis of Price Changes Among Listed Central and Eastern European Oil Companies Causal Linkages Between Patenting Abroad and Promoting FDI Through the Prism of Social Network Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1