Fear and COVID-19 Protective Behaviors among High School Students in Hamadan, Iran; Application of an Extended Parallel Process Model

Q3 Social Sciences Journal of Education and Community Health Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.52547/jech.8.3.165
S. Shirahmadi, S. Bashirian, M. Barati, E. Jenabi, M. Haghighi, F. Shamsaei, Rashid Heidari-moghadam, S. Khazaei, Sepideh Zareian, M. Poordavood, Yaser Nankali, Nematollah Bahiraee, Shahnaz Farzian, A. Asgari
{"title":"Fear and COVID-19 Protective Behaviors among High School Students in Hamadan, Iran; Application of an Extended Parallel Process Model","authors":"S. Shirahmadi, S. Bashirian, M. Barati, E. Jenabi, M. Haghighi, F. Shamsaei, Rashid Heidari-moghadam, S. Khazaei, Sepideh Zareian, M. Poordavood, Yaser Nankali, Nematollah Bahiraee, Shahnaz Farzian, A. Asgari","doi":"10.52547/jech.8.3.165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: Throughout the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the role of students in transmitting the infection has received special attention aiming at protecting the younger generation against COVID-19 and other known respiratory diseases. This research aimed to specify factors related to Covid-19 preventing behaviors in high school students. Instrument & Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 2852 students aged 13 to 18 in Hamadan in 2020. Participants were selected using the multistage cluster sampling method. The data were collected with a researcher-made EPPM questionnaire. Data were analyzed statistically by Stata 14.2 software using the Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Findings: The vast majority of students (67.02%) were in the danger control response phase. The response efficacy (77.3%) and perceived efficacy (75.3%) had the highest percentage of the mean from the maximum obtainable score among constructs of the model. There was a significant difference between categories of the EPPM model with doing healthy behaviors. Moreover, the proportion of doing health behaviors was significantly higher in students in the danger control phase. Conclusions: The predominance of the perceived threat of COVID-19 on the perceived efficacy affects preventive health behaviors. Therefore, a theory-based behavioral modification program can be developed based on gender among high school students. Higher grade students and poor socioeconomic status require intense educational interventions to modify their hygienic behaviors. © 2021, the Authors.","PeriodicalId":36491,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/jech.8.3.165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Aims: Throughout the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the role of students in transmitting the infection has received special attention aiming at protecting the younger generation against COVID-19 and other known respiratory diseases. This research aimed to specify factors related to Covid-19 preventing behaviors in high school students. Instrument & Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 2852 students aged 13 to 18 in Hamadan in 2020. Participants were selected using the multistage cluster sampling method. The data were collected with a researcher-made EPPM questionnaire. Data were analyzed statistically by Stata 14.2 software using the Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Findings: The vast majority of students (67.02%) were in the danger control response phase. The response efficacy (77.3%) and perceived efficacy (75.3%) had the highest percentage of the mean from the maximum obtainable score among constructs of the model. There was a significant difference between categories of the EPPM model with doing healthy behaviors. Moreover, the proportion of doing health behaviors was significantly higher in students in the danger control phase. Conclusions: The predominance of the perceived threat of COVID-19 on the perceived efficacy affects preventive health behaviors. Therefore, a theory-based behavioral modification program can be developed based on gender among high school students. Higher grade students and poor socioeconomic status require intense educational interventions to modify their hygienic behaviors. © 2021, the Authors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗哈马丹市高中生的恐惧与COVID-19防护行为扩展并行过程模型的应用
目标:在持续的新冠肺炎大流行期间,学生在传播感染方面的作用受到了特别关注,旨在保护年轻一代免受新冠肺炎和其他已知呼吸道疾病的感染。本研究旨在明确高中生新冠肺炎预防行为的相关因素。仪器与方法:这项横断面研究于2020年在哈马丹对2852名13至18岁的学生进行。参与者采用多阶段整群抽样方法进行选择。数据是通过研究人员制作的EPPM问卷收集的。数据通过Stata 14.2软件使用卡方和Fisher精确检验进行统计分析。调查结果:绝大多数学生(67.02%)处于危险控制反应阶段。在该模型的构建体中,反应有效性(77.3%)和感知有效性(75.3%)的平均值与可获得的最大得分的百分比最高。EPPM模型的类别与健康行为之间存在显著差异。此外,处于危险控制阶段的学生进行健康行为的比例显著较高。结论:新冠肺炎的感知威胁对感知疗效的主导作用影响预防健康行为。因此,可以在高中生中基于性别制定一个基于理论的行为矫正计划。高年级学生和较差的社会经济地位需要强有力的教育干预来改变他们的卫生行为。©2021,作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Education and Community Health
Journal of Education and Community Health Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Social Support Theory as a Predictor of Sleep Hygiene Behaviors Among Older Adults Preventive Behaviors of Iranian Women Toward Sexually Transmitted Infections: A Perspective of Motivation Protection Theory Factors Influencing Substance Use Relapse in People Referring to Addiction Recovery Centers in Jiroft, Kerman Investigating the Effect of Tailored Educational Program Based on Protection Motivation Theory on Mammography Adherence in Iranian Women Subjective Well-Being and Its Relationship With Personality Traits, Irrational Beliefs, and Social Support: A Model Test
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1