STOOL ANTIGEN (HPSA) TEST IN DETECTION OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION AMONG ADULT DYSPEPTIC PATIENTS IN TRIPOLI, LIBYA

G. Huwiage, A. Nami, A. Akadh
{"title":"STOOL ANTIGEN (HPSA) TEST IN DETECTION OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION AMONG ADULT DYSPEPTIC PATIENTS IN TRIPOLI, LIBYA","authors":"G. Huwiage, A. Nami, A. Akadh","doi":"10.11603/ijmmr.2413-6077.2019.2.10334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Helicobacter pylori is the most common infection in the world. Relationship between H. pylori and dyspepsia was confirmed by many studies, it has been strongly associated with peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. In that respect, several invasive and noninvasive methods for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection were utilized. Objective. The aim of the study was to evaluate the association between dyspepsia and the positivity of H. pylori stool antigen test, to compare this test with serological IgG test. Methods. 125 adult patients were randomly selected from gastroenterology units of Mediterranean and Tajurah clinics in Tripoli. Stool samples were taken for detection of H. pylori antigen by enzyme immunoassay. Blood samples for detection of anti-H. pylori IgG antibodies were taken. Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS. Results. 125 dyspeptic patients: 47 male and 78 female, aged 18-83 years old were examined. 80 patients were infected by H. pylori that was proved by a positive stool test, 88 had a positive IgG test. The prevalence was higher in the patients aged 28-47 years old. There was substantial relation to age, marital status and economic risk factors; there was no association between H. pylori and gender, sources of drinking water, living standards, smoking, family history of peptic ulcer, drug consumption, and blood groups. Conclusions. Relatively high rates of detection by HpSA prove that stool testing might be a reliable, simple, inexpensive, and non-invasive alternative test ащк detectшщт of H. pylori, diagnosing active infection and confirming cure. However IgG test has a low sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy compare to the HpSA test. Thus it can be used for screening purposes.","PeriodicalId":14059,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medicine and Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medicine and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11603/ijmmr.2413-6077.2019.2.10334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Helicobacter pylori is the most common infection in the world. Relationship between H. pylori and dyspepsia was confirmed by many studies, it has been strongly associated with peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. In that respect, several invasive and noninvasive methods for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection were utilized. Objective. The aim of the study was to evaluate the association between dyspepsia and the positivity of H. pylori stool antigen test, to compare this test with serological IgG test. Methods. 125 adult patients were randomly selected from gastroenterology units of Mediterranean and Tajurah clinics in Tripoli. Stool samples were taken for detection of H. pylori antigen by enzyme immunoassay. Blood samples for detection of anti-H. pylori IgG antibodies were taken. Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS. Results. 125 dyspeptic patients: 47 male and 78 female, aged 18-83 years old were examined. 80 patients were infected by H. pylori that was proved by a positive stool test, 88 had a positive IgG test. The prevalence was higher in the patients aged 28-47 years old. There was substantial relation to age, marital status and economic risk factors; there was no association between H. pylori and gender, sources of drinking water, living standards, smoking, family history of peptic ulcer, drug consumption, and blood groups. Conclusions. Relatively high rates of detection by HpSA prove that stool testing might be a reliable, simple, inexpensive, and non-invasive alternative test ащк detectшщт of H. pylori, diagnosing active infection and confirming cure. However IgG test has a low sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy compare to the HpSA test. Thus it can be used for screening purposes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粪便抗原(HPSA)检测利比亚的黎波里成年消化不良患者幽门螺杆菌感染
背景。幽门螺杆菌是世界上最常见的感染。幽门螺杆菌与消化不良的关系已被许多研究证实,它与消化性溃疡疾病和胃癌密切相关。在这方面,使用了几种有创和无创方法来诊断幽门螺杆菌感染。目标。本研究的目的是评估消化不良与幽门螺杆菌粪便抗原检测阳性之间的关系,并将其与血清学IgG检测进行比较。方法:从的黎波里地中海和塔朱拉诊所的胃肠科随机抽取125名成年患者。取粪便标本,采用酶免疫法检测幽门螺杆菌抗原。血液样本用于检测抗h。检测幽门螺杆菌IgG抗体。数据采用SPSS进行统计学分析。结果:125例消化不良患者,男47例,女78例,年龄18 ~ 83岁。80例患者大便检查证实幽门螺杆菌感染,88例患者IgG检测阳性。28-47岁患者患病率较高。与年龄、婚姻状况、经济风险因素有密切关系;幽门螺杆菌与性别、饮用水来源、生活水平、吸烟、消化性溃疡家族史、药物使用和血型之间没有关联。结论。相对较高的HpSA检出率证明粪便检测可能是一种可靠、简单、廉价、无创的幽门螺杆菌替代检测ащк detectшщт,可诊断活动性感染并确认治愈。然而,与HpSA检测相比,IgG检测的敏感性、特异性和准确性较低。因此,它可以用于筛选目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
ANTHROPOMETRIC VARIABLES IN BREAST LESIONS OF WOMEN OF REPRODUCTIVE AGE IN UNIVERSITY OF PORT HARCOURT TEACHING HOSPITAL COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF SYMPTOMS IN NEUROTIC AND AFFECTIVE PATIENTS AFTER COVID-19 FLUORIDES AND ORAL HEALTH IMPACT OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON THE RADIOTHERAPY AND CANCER PATIENTS IN A TERTIARY HEALTH CARE CENTER OF ASSAM, NORTHEAST INDIA: A RETROSPECTIVE SINGLE INSTITUTION STUDY SICKLE CELL THALASSEMIA IN AN ADULT FROM CENTRAL INDIA SHOWING MASSIVE SPLENIC INFARCTION AND GAMNA-GANDY BODIES IN SPLENIC PARENCHYMA WITH CONCOMITANT PLASMODIUM FALCIPARUM INFECTION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1