The prosperous decade of 2004-2013 and new developmentalism

D. Fiocca
{"title":"The prosperous decade of 2004-2013 and new developmentalism","authors":"D. Fiocca","doi":"10.1590/0101-31572023-3454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Since the 1990s, three different phases marked the Brazilian economy: a 13 year long “quasi-stagnation” (1991-2003); a decade of prosperity (2004-2013); and an 8 year period of economic decline (2014-2021). Leading new developmentalist authors identify policies introduced in the 1990s as causes of slower economic growth. This article argues that, even if that hypothesis is correct, it is still inadequate to treat the last 30 years as a single economic phase. We then compare policies implemented in 2004-2013 with developmentalist recommendations, concluding that most of them are compatible. Finally, the article highlights changes in the international and Brazilian contexts between the 1970s and the present, which reinforce the importance of analyzing the most recent growth experience.","PeriodicalId":35163,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Economia Politica/Brazilian Journal of Political Economy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Economia Politica/Brazilian Journal of Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572023-3454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Since the 1990s, three different phases marked the Brazilian economy: a 13 year long “quasi-stagnation” (1991-2003); a decade of prosperity (2004-2013); and an 8 year period of economic decline (2014-2021). Leading new developmentalist authors identify policies introduced in the 1990s as causes of slower economic growth. This article argues that, even if that hypothesis is correct, it is still inadequate to treat the last 30 years as a single economic phase. We then compare policies implemented in 2004-2013 with developmentalist recommendations, concluding that most of them are compatible. Finally, the article highlights changes in the international and Brazilian contexts between the 1970s and the present, which reinforce the importance of analyzing the most recent growth experience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2004-2013繁荣十年与新发展主义
摘要自20世纪90年代以来,巴西经济经历了三个不同的阶段:长达13年的“准停滞”(1991-2003);繁荣的十年(2004-2013);以及8年的经济衰退期(2014-2021年)。新发展主义的主要作者认为,20世纪90年代出台的政策是经济增长放缓的原因。本文认为,即使这一假设是正确的,也不足以将过去30年视为一个单一的经济阶段。然后,我们将2004-2013年实施的政策与发展主义建议进行了比较,得出结论认为其中大多数政策是兼容的。最后,文章强调了从20世纪70年代到现在,国际和巴西环境的变化,这加强了分析最新增长经验的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Economia Politica/Brazilian Journal of Political Economy
Revista de Economia Politica/Brazilian Journal of Political Economy Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Brazilian Journal of Political Economy/Revista de Economia Política é uma revista acadêmica, peer reviewed, bilíngue, publicada trimestralmente desde 1981 pelo Centro de Economia Política através da Editora 34. Está indexada na Scielo e no Journal of Economic Literature. É a mais citadas das revistas acadêmicas de economia do Brasil.
期刊最新文献
Fritz Redlich and the entrepreneur as God and demon Why the economy is hard to manage and how this could possibly be dealt with From the national system of technological innovation to the “New Projectment Economy” in China Growth regimes in central and peripheral countries: an econometric analysis, 1980-2018 What Have We Learned about National Development Banks? Evidence from Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1