Evaluating the Effect of Occupational Health Education on Workers Knowledge

Rateb Abuzeid, Ahed Al Najjar, Nabeel Abdulqader
{"title":"Evaluating the Effect of Occupational Health Education on Workers Knowledge","authors":"Rateb Abuzeid, Ahed Al Najjar, Nabeel Abdulqader","doi":"10.29011/2475-5605.001087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Studies show that about 90% of accidents occur because of unsafe behavior and human errors. Even if workers do not have the right knowledge toward safety measures in a safe workplace, all efforts for an accident-free workplace will be in vain. Maintaining a safe working environment is reflected on a healthy worker. Some reasons for not implementing the safety policy by most developing countries is lack of basic professional training in occupational health and safety. Objective: The purpose of the study is to assess the impact of the Occupational Health Education Program on the worker’s knowledge. Methods: A quasi-experimental, nonequivalent control group pretest-posttest design was used to assess the impact of the Occupational Health Education Program (OHEP) on the worker knowledge. A convenience sample of a total of 38 workers participated in the study, with 20 in the experimental group and 18 in the control group. Results: The findings from the study indicate that OHEP did have significant positive impact on the Jordanian worker’s knowledge, but it didn’t have comparable impact on the Foreigner worker’s knowledge. A comparison of means for the Jordanian experimental group pretest (M =14.25) and posttest (M =18.60) revealed a significant improvement in mean scores (df = 9, Tukey a = 2.98), whereas the control group pretest (M = 14.40) and posttest (M = 14.90) did not statistically significantly (df = 9, t =.64). Findings shows that both the Jordanian and Foreigner experimental and control groups were comparable in relation to their occupational health knowledge before the implementation of the OHEP. Conclusion: The findings support the need for implementation of the OHEP within this population. This study shows that nurses can design, implement and evaluate Health Education Programs for targeted population.","PeriodicalId":92630,"journal":{"name":"Emergency medicine investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency medicine investigations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2475-5605.001087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Studies show that about 90% of accidents occur because of unsafe behavior and human errors. Even if workers do not have the right knowledge toward safety measures in a safe workplace, all efforts for an accident-free workplace will be in vain. Maintaining a safe working environment is reflected on a healthy worker. Some reasons for not implementing the safety policy by most developing countries is lack of basic professional training in occupational health and safety. Objective: The purpose of the study is to assess the impact of the Occupational Health Education Program on the worker’s knowledge. Methods: A quasi-experimental, nonequivalent control group pretest-posttest design was used to assess the impact of the Occupational Health Education Program (OHEP) on the worker knowledge. A convenience sample of a total of 38 workers participated in the study, with 20 in the experimental group and 18 in the control group. Results: The findings from the study indicate that OHEP did have significant positive impact on the Jordanian worker’s knowledge, but it didn’t have comparable impact on the Foreigner worker’s knowledge. A comparison of means for the Jordanian experimental group pretest (M =14.25) and posttest (M =18.60) revealed a significant improvement in mean scores (df = 9, Tukey a = 2.98), whereas the control group pretest (M = 14.40) and posttest (M = 14.90) did not statistically significantly (df = 9, t =.64). Findings shows that both the Jordanian and Foreigner experimental and control groups were comparable in relation to their occupational health knowledge before the implementation of the OHEP. Conclusion: The findings support the need for implementation of the OHEP within this population. This study shows that nurses can design, implement and evaluate Health Education Programs for targeted population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职业健康教育对劳动者知识的影响评价
背景:研究表明,大约90%的事故是由于不安全的行为和人为错误造成的。即使工人对安全工作场所的安全措施没有正确的认识,所有为无事故工作场所所做的努力也会白费。保持安全的工作环境体现在健康的工人身上。大多数发展中国家不执行安全政策的一些原因是缺乏职业健康和安全方面的基本专业培训。目的:本研究旨在评估职业健康教育计划对劳工知识的影响。方法:采用准实验、非等效对照组前测后测设计,评估职业健康教育计划(OHEP)对工人知识的影响。为了方便起见,总共有38名员工参加了这项研究,其中20人在实验组,18人在对照组。结果:本研究发现OHEP对约旦工人的知识有显著的正向影响,但对外籍工人的知识没有可比性的影响。约旦试验组前测(M =14.25)和后测(M =18.60)的均数比较显示均数有显著改善(df = 9, Tukey A = 2.98),而对照组前测(M = 14.40)和后测(M = 14.90)的均数无统计学意义(df = 9, t = 0.64)。结果表明,约旦人和外国人实验组和对照组在实施职业健康计划前的职业健康知识水平具有可比性。结论:研究结果支持在该人群中实施OHEP的必要性。本研究显示护士可以针对目标人群设计、实施和评估健康教育计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the Uncommon: Angina as a Rare Symptom in Cardiac Myxomas Cardiac Myxoma and Angina When Time is of the Essence: Comparison of the Resuscitation Time Frame Recommended by the Advanced Life Support Guidelines and Daily Practice Idiopathic Spinal Cord Infarction Occurring in a Young Adult Association between Disparity by Gini Coefficient for the Population Covered by Emergency Medical Service Rapid Response and Neurological Outcomes in Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Japan Managing Conventional Mass Casualty Incident during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned and Suggestions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1