Bijun Lian, Jing Li, Huan Chen, Feng Zhu, Min Qu, Yan Wang, Zepeng Jia
{"title":"A retrospective study of docetaxel combined with ADT therapy in the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer","authors":"Bijun Lian, Jing Li, Huan Chen, Feng Zhu, Min Qu, Yan Wang, Zepeng Jia","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2020.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigte the efficacy of docetaxel combined with androgen deprivation therapy for the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer based on Chinese population. \n \n \nMethods \nA total of 497 patients were enrolled from January 2004 to July 2018 in the Changhai Hospital. 459 patients received androgen deprivation therapy alone and 38 patients received androgen deprivation therapy combined with docetaxel. The mean age was (72.1±8.7)years. The median PSA level was 100.0 ng/ml, ranging 42.3-999.0 ng/ml. Patients of clinical T2, T3, T4 stage were 213(42.9%), 160(32.2%), 124(24.9%), respectively. Patients of clinical N0, N1, Nx stage were 319(64.2%), 144(29.0%), 34(6.8%), respectively. Patients of clinical M0, M1a, M1b, M1c, Mx stage were 100(20.1%), 51(10.3%), 332(66.8%), 9(1.8%), 5(1.0%), respectively. Gleason scores of biopsy showed that 146(29.4%) patients was ≤7, 103(20.7%) was 8 and 248(49.9%)was ≥9. Propensity score matching was used to match the baseline between groups. Caliper value was set at 0.02. SPSS 22 software was used to achieve a 1∶1 match between the two groups. There were no statistical difference in the age(P=0.102), PSA(P=0.713), T stage(P=0.113), N stage(P=0.226), M stage(P=0.514), Gleason score(P=0.612), tumor loading(P=0.812)between the two groups. The castration resistance-free rate and cancer specific survival rate of the two groups were compared by log-rank and breslow-wilcoxon test. Furthermore, forest plots were used to display the analysis results of different subgroups such as age, PSA, clinical stage, Gleason score, tumor load, whether patients had received palliative resection, and the differences in castration resistance-free rate were compared between the subgroups with high tumor load. \n \n \nResults \nThe median follow-up time was 22.6 months in the androgen deprivation therapy group and 13.7 months in the combined therapy group. The number of patients with castration resistance in the two groups was 23 and 17, respectively. There were 3 and 6 deaths, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall progression time to castration resistance between the two groups (10.3 m vs. 16.5 m, P>0.05), and no statistically significant difference in the prostate cancer specific survival rate (21.9 m vs.14.8 m, P>0.05). When subgroup analysis was performed, it was found that patients in the high-metastasis-volume subgroup who received the combination therapy had a significantly longer castration resistance free lifetime (10.6 m vs. 7.2 m, P=0.044), but there was no significant difference in the low- metastasis-volume subgroup(10.5 m vs.12.6 m, P>0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nDocetaxel combined with androgen deprivation therapy can improve the castration resistance free rate in patients with high metastasis volume, but not in low metastasis volume group. \n \n \nKey words: \nProstatic neoplasms; Prostate cancer; Docetaxel; Chemotherapy; Androgen deprivation therapy; Propensity score matching","PeriodicalId":10343,"journal":{"name":"中华泌尿外科杂志","volume":"41 1","pages":"26-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华泌尿外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2020.01.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To investigte the efficacy of docetaxel combined with androgen deprivation therapy for the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer based on Chinese population.
Methods
A total of 497 patients were enrolled from January 2004 to July 2018 in the Changhai Hospital. 459 patients received androgen deprivation therapy alone and 38 patients received androgen deprivation therapy combined with docetaxel. The mean age was (72.1±8.7)years. The median PSA level was 100.0 ng/ml, ranging 42.3-999.0 ng/ml. Patients of clinical T2, T3, T4 stage were 213(42.9%), 160(32.2%), 124(24.9%), respectively. Patients of clinical N0, N1, Nx stage were 319(64.2%), 144(29.0%), 34(6.8%), respectively. Patients of clinical M0, M1a, M1b, M1c, Mx stage were 100(20.1%), 51(10.3%), 332(66.8%), 9(1.8%), 5(1.0%), respectively. Gleason scores of biopsy showed that 146(29.4%) patients was ≤7, 103(20.7%) was 8 and 248(49.9%)was ≥9. Propensity score matching was used to match the baseline between groups. Caliper value was set at 0.02. SPSS 22 software was used to achieve a 1∶1 match between the two groups. There were no statistical difference in the age(P=0.102), PSA(P=0.713), T stage(P=0.113), N stage(P=0.226), M stage(P=0.514), Gleason score(P=0.612), tumor loading(P=0.812)between the two groups. The castration resistance-free rate and cancer specific survival rate of the two groups were compared by log-rank and breslow-wilcoxon test. Furthermore, forest plots were used to display the analysis results of different subgroups such as age, PSA, clinical stage, Gleason score, tumor load, whether patients had received palliative resection, and the differences in castration resistance-free rate were compared between the subgroups with high tumor load.
Results
The median follow-up time was 22.6 months in the androgen deprivation therapy group and 13.7 months in the combined therapy group. The number of patients with castration resistance in the two groups was 23 and 17, respectively. There were 3 and 6 deaths, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall progression time to castration resistance between the two groups (10.3 m vs. 16.5 m, P>0.05), and no statistically significant difference in the prostate cancer specific survival rate (21.9 m vs.14.8 m, P>0.05). When subgroup analysis was performed, it was found that patients in the high-metastasis-volume subgroup who received the combination therapy had a significantly longer castration resistance free lifetime (10.6 m vs. 7.2 m, P=0.044), but there was no significant difference in the low- metastasis-volume subgroup(10.5 m vs.12.6 m, P>0.05).
Conclusion
Docetaxel combined with androgen deprivation therapy can improve the castration resistance free rate in patients with high metastasis volume, but not in low metastasis volume group.
Key words:
Prostatic neoplasms; Prostate cancer; Docetaxel; Chemotherapy; Androgen deprivation therapy; Propensity score matching
目的探讨多西紫杉醇联合雄激素剥夺治疗转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌在中国人群中的疗效。方法选取2004年1月至2018年7月在长海医院接受雄激素剥夺治疗的497例患者,其中单独接受雄激素剥夺治疗的459例,联合多西紫杉醇治疗的38例。平均年龄(72.1±8.7)岁。中位PSA水平为100.0 ng/ml,范围为42.3 ~ 999.0 ng/ml。临床T2、T3、T4期患者分别为213例(42.9%)、160例(32.2%)、124例(24.9%)。临床N0、N1、Nx期分别为319例(64.2%)、144例(29.0%)、34例(6.8%)。临床M0、M1a、M1b、M1c、Mx期患者分别为100例(20.1%)、51例(10.3%)、332例(66.8%)、9例(1.8%)、5例(1.0%)。活检Gleason评分显示≤7者146例(29.4%),8者103例(20.7%),≥9者248例(49.9%)。倾向评分匹配用于组间基线的匹配。卡尺值设为0.02。采用SPSS 22软件对两组数据进行1∶1匹配。两组患者年龄(P=0.102)、PSA(P=0.713)、T分期(P=0.113)、N分期(P=0.226)、M分期(P=0.514)、Gleason评分(P=0.612)、肿瘤负荷(P=0.812)比较,差异均无统计学意义。采用log-rank和brreslow -wilcoxon检验比较两组患者的去势抵抗率和肿瘤特异性生存率。采用森林图显示年龄、PSA、临床分期、Gleason评分、肿瘤负荷、是否行姑息性切除等不同亚组的分析结果,比较高肿瘤负荷亚组间去势无阻力率的差异。结果雄激素剥夺治疗组中位随访时间为22.6个月,联合治疗组中位随访时间为13.7个月。两组出现去势抵抗的患者分别为23例和17例。分别有3人和6人死亡。两组患者到去势抵抗的总进展时间(10.3 m vs. 16.5 m, P>0.05)差异无统计学意义,前列腺癌特异性生存率(21.9 m vs.14.8 m, P>0.05)差异无统计学意义。亚组分析发现,接受联合治疗的高转移量亚组患者的去势抵抗自由寿命明显更长(10.6 m vs. 7.2 m, P=0.044),而低转移量亚组患者的去势抵抗自由寿命无显著差异(10.5 m vs.12.6 m, P= 0.05)。结论多西紫杉醇联合雄激素剥夺治疗可提高高转移量患者的去势抵抗率,而对低转移量组无改善作用。关键词:前列腺肿瘤;前列腺癌;多西他赛;化疗;雄激素剥夺疗法;倾向评分匹配
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Urology (monthly) was founded in 1980. It is a publicly issued academic journal supervised by the China Association for Science and Technology and sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association. It mainly publishes original research papers, reviews and comments in this field. This journal mainly reports on the latest scientific research results and clinical diagnosis and treatment experience in the professional field of urology at home and abroad, as well as basic theoretical research results closely related to clinical practice.
The journal has columns such as treatises, abstracts of treatises, experimental studies, case reports, experience exchanges, reviews, reviews, lectures, etc.
Chinese Journal of Urology has been included in well-known databases such as Peking University Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences), CSCD Chinese Science Citation Database Source Journal (including extended version), and also included in American Chemical Abstracts (CA). The journal has been rated as a quality journal by the Association for Science and Technology and as an excellent journal by the Chinese Medical Association.