Disentangling Trade Effects of the Korea: China FTA: Trade Liberalization or Political Conflicts?

IF 0.4 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS Journal of Korea Trade Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.35611/jkt.2023.27.3.21
HuiHui Yin, Juyoung Cheong
{"title":"Disentangling Trade Effects of the Korea: China FTA: Trade Liberalization or Political Conflicts?","authors":"HuiHui Yin, Juyoung Cheong","doi":"10.35611/jkt.2023.27.3.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – This paper investigates the trade effect of the Korea-China Free Trade Agreement (KCFTA) which coincides with political conflicts between the two countries due to the deployment of the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) in Korea. The two events occurred in the same year and both are likely to affect trade between two countries but in opposite directions. Therefore, it is crucial to distinguish between the trade effects from the KCFTA event and those from the THAAD event to evaluate the true FTA effects. However, this would be difficult when using only annual data. Accordingly, ex post studies to examine the trade effects of KCFTA are lacking in trustworthiness while many ex ante studies that conjecture the positive trade effects neglect the THAAD deployment impact. This paper aims to fill that gap. Design/methodology – Given that the KCFTA and THAAD events occurred in the same year but in different months, we use the monthly data from 2000 to 2019 of Korea’s exports to bracket this period. We employ the difference-in-difference (DID) method within a gravity equation specification that uses hi-dimensional fixed effects to address various endogeneity issues and seasonal effects. We identify the net impact of KCFTA ratification from these two near-simultaneous events to quantify the effects of trade liberalization between these two countries. Findings – After isolating the THAAD effects on trade, the analysis creates a positive and statistically significant coefficient estimate of the KCFTA impact. In contrast, failing to isolate the THAAD effect produced a negative and statistically significant coefficient estimate of the KCFTA impact. Our results indicate that KCFTA independently increased Korea’s exports to China by 10.2%, but that this increase was fully mitigated by the THAAD event. Further, our results verify that unobserved heterogeneity and multilateral resistance are technically difficult to account for in those estimations as that rely solely upon annual data, as this type of data are inadequate to control for the potential for endogeneity. Originality/value – This paper is one of the first studies to carefully evaluate the net trade effects of the KCFTA on Korea’s largest trading partner while isolating the impact of simultaneously occurred political events that may influence trade in opposing directions. Our findings indicate that the lack of prior evidence of positive trade effects of the KCFTA when using annual data may be attributed to a failure to identify the impact of each event separately. This analysis supports using the correct modeling specification to avoid misleading conclusions when evaluating any important international trade policy.","PeriodicalId":37797,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korea Trade","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korea Trade","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35611/jkt.2023.27.3.21","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose – This paper investigates the trade effect of the Korea-China Free Trade Agreement (KCFTA) which coincides with political conflicts between the two countries due to the deployment of the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) in Korea. The two events occurred in the same year and both are likely to affect trade between two countries but in opposite directions. Therefore, it is crucial to distinguish between the trade effects from the KCFTA event and those from the THAAD event to evaluate the true FTA effects. However, this would be difficult when using only annual data. Accordingly, ex post studies to examine the trade effects of KCFTA are lacking in trustworthiness while many ex ante studies that conjecture the positive trade effects neglect the THAAD deployment impact. This paper aims to fill that gap. Design/methodology – Given that the KCFTA and THAAD events occurred in the same year but in different months, we use the monthly data from 2000 to 2019 of Korea’s exports to bracket this period. We employ the difference-in-difference (DID) method within a gravity equation specification that uses hi-dimensional fixed effects to address various endogeneity issues and seasonal effects. We identify the net impact of KCFTA ratification from these two near-simultaneous events to quantify the effects of trade liberalization between these two countries. Findings – After isolating the THAAD effects on trade, the analysis creates a positive and statistically significant coefficient estimate of the KCFTA impact. In contrast, failing to isolate the THAAD effect produced a negative and statistically significant coefficient estimate of the KCFTA impact. Our results indicate that KCFTA independently increased Korea’s exports to China by 10.2%, but that this increase was fully mitigated by the THAAD event. Further, our results verify that unobserved heterogeneity and multilateral resistance are technically difficult to account for in those estimations as that rely solely upon annual data, as this type of data are inadequate to control for the potential for endogeneity. Originality/value – This paper is one of the first studies to carefully evaluate the net trade effects of the KCFTA on Korea’s largest trading partner while isolating the impact of simultaneously occurred political events that may influence trade in opposing directions. Our findings indicate that the lack of prior evidence of positive trade effects of the KCFTA when using annual data may be attributed to a failure to identify the impact of each event separately. This analysis supports using the correct modeling specification to avoid misleading conclusions when evaluating any important international trade policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中韩自由贸易协定的贸易效应解析:贸易自由化还是政治冲突?
目的——本文调查了韩中自由贸易协定(KCFTA)的贸易效应,该协定恰逢两国因在韩国部署末段高空区域防御系统(THAAD)而发生的政治冲突。这两起事件发生在同一年,都可能影响两国之间的贸易,但方向相反。因此,区分KCFTA事件和萨德事件的贸易影响,以评估真正的FTA效果至关重要。然而,如果只使用年度数据,这将很困难。因此,研究朝韩自由贸易协定贸易影响的事后研究缺乏可信度,而许多推测积极贸易影响的事前研究忽视了萨德部署的影响。本文旨在填补这一空白。设计/方法-考虑到朝韩自由贸易协定和萨德事件发生在同一年,但发生在不同的月份,我们使用2000年至2019年韩国出口的月度数据来对这一时期进行评分。我们在重力方程规范中采用了差分法,该规范使用高维固定效应来解决各种内生性问题和季节性效应。我们从这两个几乎同时发生的事件中确定了批准KCFTA的净影响,以量化这两个国家之间贸易自由化的影响。调查结果-在隔离萨德对贸易的影响后,该分析对KCFTA的影响产生了积极且具有统计学意义的系数估计。相反,未能隔离THAAD效应对KCFTA影响产生了负面且具有统计学意义的系数估计。我们的结果表明,KCFTA独立地将韩国对中国的出口增加了10.2%,但萨德事件完全缓解了这一增长。此外,我们的研究结果证实,在技术上很难在这些估计中解释未观察到的异质性和多边阻力,因为这些估计仅依赖于年度数据,因为这类数据不足以控制内生性的潜力。原创性/价值——本文是第一批仔细评估朝韩自由贸易协定对韩国最大贸易伙伴的净贸易影响的研究之一,同时隔离了同时发生的可能影响贸易的政治事件的影响。我们的研究结果表明,在使用年度数据时,缺乏KCFTA积极贸易影响的先前证据,这可能归因于未能单独确定每一事件的影响。该分析支持在评估任何重要的国际贸易政策时使用正确的建模规范,以避免得出误导性结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Korea Trade
Journal of Korea Trade Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Journal of Korea Trade purports to support and encourage researches in the area of international economics, international business and foreign trade practices & laws. The Journal welcomes theoretical and empirical papers in the broadly-defined international trade issues and policy implications in the context of Korea Trade.
期刊最新文献
Legal Implications of U.S. CVD on Tires and Undervalued Currency in the WTO's SCM The Effect of Economic and Infrastructure Factors on the Formation of Electric Vehicle Supply Chain and Optimal Location Selection: Korea-US FDI Localized Knowledge Spillovers and Organizational Capabilities: Evidence from the Canadian Manufacturing Sector A Study on Co-movements and Information Spillover Effects Between the International Commodity Futures Markets and the South Korean Stock Markets: Comparison of the COVID-19 and 2008 Financial Crises Revisiting the Role of Imported Inputs in Asian Economies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1