Managers' Intentions to Share Knowledge to Internal Auditors: The Effects of Procedural Fairness and Internal Auditor Type

IF 1.4 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Management Accounting Research Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.2308/jmar-52563
Megan Seymore, J. C. Robertson
{"title":"Managers' Intentions to Share Knowledge to Internal Auditors: The Effects of Procedural Fairness and Internal Auditor Type","authors":"Megan Seymore, J. C. Robertson","doi":"10.2308/jmar-52563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Knowledge sharing to internal auditors by managers helps internal auditors learn about critical information and improve operational effectiveness, internal controls, and the internal audit function. We examine the interactive effects of procedural fairness at the start of an internal audit, and auditor type (in-house or outsourced) on managers' intentions to share tacit knowledge during an audit, and intentions to share subsequent knowledge of a material control weakness. Our results indicate procedural fairness is an intervention that can increase managers' intentions to share knowledge, yet it depends on internal auditor type and differs by the type of knowledge shared. A high level of procedural fairness increases intentions to share tacit knowledge to outsourced internal auditors only. However, a high level of procedural fairness increases intentions to share subsequent knowledge of a material control weakness to in-house internal auditors only. We offer contributions to the accounting literature and implications for practice.\n Data Availability: Data available upon request from authors.","PeriodicalId":46474,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Accounting Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-52563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Knowledge sharing to internal auditors by managers helps internal auditors learn about critical information and improve operational effectiveness, internal controls, and the internal audit function. We examine the interactive effects of procedural fairness at the start of an internal audit, and auditor type (in-house or outsourced) on managers' intentions to share tacit knowledge during an audit, and intentions to share subsequent knowledge of a material control weakness. Our results indicate procedural fairness is an intervention that can increase managers' intentions to share knowledge, yet it depends on internal auditor type and differs by the type of knowledge shared. A high level of procedural fairness increases intentions to share tacit knowledge to outsourced internal auditors only. However, a high level of procedural fairness increases intentions to share subsequent knowledge of a material control weakness to in-house internal auditors only. We offer contributions to the accounting literature and implications for practice. Data Availability: Data available upon request from authors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理者向内部审计师分享知识的意愿:程序公平与内部审计师类型的影响
管理人员向内部审计师分享知识有助于内部审计师了解关键信息,提高运营效率、内部控制和内部审计职能。我们研究了内部审计开始时程序公平性和审计师类型(内部或外包)对管理人员在审计期间分享隐性知识的意图以及分享重大控制薄弱环节后续知识的意图的交互影响。我们的研究结果表明,程序公平是一种干预措施,可以提高管理者共享知识的意愿,但它取决于内部审计师的类型,并因共享知识的类型而异。高水平的程序公平性增加了只与外包内部审计师分享隐性知识的意愿。然而,高水平的程序公平性增加了仅向内部审计师分享后续重大控制弱点知识的意愿。我们提供对会计文献的贡献和对实践的启示。数据可用性: 可根据作者要求提供数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Management Accounting Research (JMAR) is to advance the theory and practice of management accounting through publication of high-quality applied and theoretical research, using any well-executed research method. JMAR serves the global community of scholars and practitioners whose work impacts or is informed by the role that accounting information plays in decision-making and performance measurement within organizations. Settings may include profit and not-for profit organizations, service, retail and manufacturing organizations and domestic, foreign, and multinational firms. JMAR furthermore seeks to advance an understanding of management accounting in its broader context, such as issues related to the interface between internal and external reporting or taxation. New theories, topical areas, and research methods, as well as original research with novel implications to improve practice and disseminate the best managerial accounting practices are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
The Joint Effect of Organizational Identification and Internal Reporting Environment Openness on Budgetary Misreporting Enterprise Risk Management as Part of the Organizational Control Package: Review and Implications for Management Accounting Research Rotten Apples and Sterling Examples: Norm-Based Moral Reasoning and Peer Influences on Honesty The Immunization Effect of Internal Control System Transparency following a Supplier’s Violation of Buyer Trust The Effect of Horizontal Pay Transparency on Employee Motivation When Pay Dispersion Is Performance Based and Non-Performance Based
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1