Efficacy of Interventions Targeting Language Comprehension

Q4 Social Sciences Word of Mouth Pub Date : 2023-04-15 DOI:10.1177/10483950231161474
C. Westby
{"title":"Efficacy of Interventions Targeting Language Comprehension","authors":"C. Westby","doi":"10.1177/10483950231161474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are to employ evidence-based practices found in the research literature. Evidence of the effectiveness of therapy for older children with developmental language disorder (DLD), and particularly those with oral language comprehension/receptive language impairments, is very limited (Boyle et al., 2010; Ebbels et al., 2017). In young children, some language difficulties are ameliorated through maturation and intervention (Law et al., 2000). If children age 5 years and older still present language difficulties, it is likely that these difficulties will persist in some form also later in life (Bishop et al., 2017). The age of the individual may also affect what kind of interventions should be used. The authors of this article conducted a systematic scoping review of literature on oral language comprehension interventions. Their intent was to develop an overview on the topic and to summarize the findings of the current research. The authors found a limited number of studies in general and a very small number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Consequently, a systematic review including only RCTs was not considered to be the best option, and it was decided to look for evidence from studies conducted with various research designs. School-age children and adolescents between 5 and 17 years of age with DLD were the target population of the review. The intervention was defined as an intervention aiming to improve oral language comprehension on its own or together with expressive language. The outcomes were skills in one or more areas contributing to oral language comprehension. The research questions for the review were the following:","PeriodicalId":39491,"journal":{"name":"Word of Mouth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Word of Mouth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10483950231161474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are to employ evidence-based practices found in the research literature. Evidence of the effectiveness of therapy for older children with developmental language disorder (DLD), and particularly those with oral language comprehension/receptive language impairments, is very limited (Boyle et al., 2010; Ebbels et al., 2017). In young children, some language difficulties are ameliorated through maturation and intervention (Law et al., 2000). If children age 5 years and older still present language difficulties, it is likely that these difficulties will persist in some form also later in life (Bishop et al., 2017). The age of the individual may also affect what kind of interventions should be used. The authors of this article conducted a systematic scoping review of literature on oral language comprehension interventions. Their intent was to develop an overview on the topic and to summarize the findings of the current research. The authors found a limited number of studies in general and a very small number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Consequently, a systematic review including only RCTs was not considered to be the best option, and it was decided to look for evidence from studies conducted with various research designs. School-age children and adolescents between 5 and 17 years of age with DLD were the target population of the review. The intervention was defined as an intervention aiming to improve oral language comprehension on its own or together with expressive language. The outcomes were skills in one or more areas contributing to oral language comprehension. The research questions for the review were the following:
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对语言理解的干预效果
言语病理学家(SLP)将采用研究文献中发现的循证实践。对患有发展性语言障碍(DLD)的大龄儿童,特别是那些有口头语言理解/接受性语言障碍的儿童,治疗有效性的证据非常有限(Boyle等人,2010;Ebbels等人,2017)。在幼儿中,一些语言困难通过成熟和干预得到改善(Law等人,2000年)。如果5岁及以上的儿童仍然存在语言困难,这些困难很可能会在以后的生活中以某种形式持续存在(Bishop等人,2017)。个人的年龄也可能影响应该使用何种干预措施。本文作者对有关口语理解干预的文献进行了系统的范围界定综述。他们的目的是对这一主题进行概述,并总结当前研究的结果。作者发现,总体而言,研究数量有限,随机对照试验(RCT)数量非常少。因此,仅包括随机对照试验的系统审查不被认为是最佳选择,因此决定从各种研究设计的研究中寻找证据。5至17岁患有DLD的学龄儿童和青少年是审查的目标人群。干预被定义为旨在单独或与表达语言一起提高口语理解的干预。结果是在一个或多个领域的技能有助于口语理解。审查的研究问题如下:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Word of Mouth
Word of Mouth Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: ...helps frontline clinicians keep up with the latest trends in working with school-age children. Each 16-page issue of bare-bones, down-to-earth information includes reviews, resources, idea swap, and short bits.
期刊最新文献
Using Conversation to Promote Language for Comprehension Syntactic Factors in Stuttering Bundle of Learning Chatbots and Neurodivergence Learning to Explain and Generalize
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1