On the record: Nicolette Naylor and Sibongile Ndashe discuss local and global developments on sexual harassment and the role of the law in responding

IF 0.2 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY South African Crime Quarterly-SACQ Pub Date : 2018-02-20 DOI:10.4314/sacq.v65i0
N. Naylor, Sibongile Ndashe
{"title":"On the record: Nicolette Naylor and Sibongile Ndashe discuss local and global developments on sexual harassment and the role of the law in responding","authors":"N. Naylor, Sibongile Ndashe","doi":"10.4314/sacq.v65i0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent local and global developments have turned the spotlight on the role of law in addressing sexual harassment in the workplace. Almost four decades after feminist legal scholars pushed for laws which recognise that sexual harassment constitutes a form of discrimination that is legally actionable, it is important to take stock of the success and limits of the law. In recent times the law has increasingly been accused of complicity in shielding abusers by (mis) applying sexual harassment policies to exonerate the perpetrators, or failing to hold institutions to account over claims that their hands are tied because victims do not want to lay formal complaints. Nicolette Naylor (Director, Ford Foundation for Southern Africa) and Sibongile Ndashe (Executive Director: The Initiative for Strategic Litigation in Africa [ISLA]) discuss the role of the law against the backdrop of the successes of campaigns like the #MeToo movement, which encourage survivors to speak out by unmasking and publicly naming perpetrators. The conversation was originally presented as an ISLA Conversation between Nicolette and Sibongile on 10 July 2018 in Johannesburg.","PeriodicalId":54100,"journal":{"name":"South African Crime Quarterly-SACQ","volume":"65 1","pages":"55-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Crime Quarterly-SACQ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/sacq.v65i0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent local and global developments have turned the spotlight on the role of law in addressing sexual harassment in the workplace. Almost four decades after feminist legal scholars pushed for laws which recognise that sexual harassment constitutes a form of discrimination that is legally actionable, it is important to take stock of the success and limits of the law. In recent times the law has increasingly been accused of complicity in shielding abusers by (mis) applying sexual harassment policies to exonerate the perpetrators, or failing to hold institutions to account over claims that their hands are tied because victims do not want to lay formal complaints. Nicolette Naylor (Director, Ford Foundation for Southern Africa) and Sibongile Ndashe (Executive Director: The Initiative for Strategic Litigation in Africa [ISLA]) discuss the role of the law against the backdrop of the successes of campaigns like the #MeToo movement, which encourage survivors to speak out by unmasking and publicly naming perpetrators. The conversation was originally presented as an ISLA Conversation between Nicolette and Sibongile on 10 July 2018 in Johannesburg.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
记录在案:Nicolette Naylor和Sibongile Ndashe讨论了当地和全球性骚扰的发展以及法律在应对中的作用
最近的地方和全球发展使法律在解决工作场所性骚扰方面的作用成为人们关注的焦点。近四十年来,女权主义法律学者推动制定法律,承认性骚扰是一种歧视,可以在法律上提起诉讼。现在,重要的是要评估这项法律的成功和局限性。近年来,越来越多的人指责法律通过(错误地)应用性骚扰政策来庇护施虐者,或未能让机构承担责任,因为受害者不想提出正式投诉,他们无能为力。Nicolette Naylor(福特南部非洲基金会主任)和Sibongile Ndashe(非洲战略诉讼倡议组织执行主任)讨论了在#MeToo运动等运动取得成功的背景下法律的作用,这些运动鼓励幸存者通过揭露和公开指名肇事者来发声。对话最初是Nicolette和Sibongile于2018年7月10日在约翰内斯堡举行的ISLA对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Crime Quarterly-SACQ
South African Crime Quarterly-SACQ CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Progressive or regressive rape case law? Tshabalala v S; Ntuli v S 2020 2 SACR 38 CC Combatting violence against African foreign nationals: A criminological approach towards community safety in the KwaZulu-Natal province of South Africa Keeping them out of prison: A restorative justice education intervention with prison inmates in Lesotho ‘Bad, sad and angry’: Responses of the SAPS leadership to the dangers of policing Understanding crime using GIS and the context of COVID-19: the case of Saldanha Bay Municipality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1