Inside Facebook’s semiosphere. How social media influence digital hate and fuel cyber-polarization

IF 1.6 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Social Semiotics Pub Date : 2022-10-20 DOI:10.1080/10350330.2022.2157171
Remo Gramigna
{"title":"Inside Facebook’s semiosphere. How social media influence digital hate and fuel cyber-polarization","authors":"Remo Gramigna","doi":"10.1080/10350330.2022.2157171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The journey inside Facebook’s semiosphere revolves around the present-day controversy on how algorithms foster polarization and discord in one of the biggest and most popular social media platforms, namely, Facebook. The present work focuses on the so-called Facebook Files as a specific case study. By drawing on these investigations, the present study discusses what are the principles used by the Facebook algorithms in order to select a certain type of content and to direct attention to it, whilst generally discarding other types of content considered not enough engaging. By drawing on the perspective of the semiotics of culture, this paper makes an analogy between Ju. Lotman’s model of the “semiosphere” and the Facebook’s digital semiosphere with the goal of unpacking how the selection, diffusion, and suppression of online content is geared towards the polarization of ideas.","PeriodicalId":21775,"journal":{"name":"Social Semiotics","volume":"32 1","pages":"606 - 633"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Semiotics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2022.2157171","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The journey inside Facebook’s semiosphere revolves around the present-day controversy on how algorithms foster polarization and discord in one of the biggest and most popular social media platforms, namely, Facebook. The present work focuses on the so-called Facebook Files as a specific case study. By drawing on these investigations, the present study discusses what are the principles used by the Facebook algorithms in order to select a certain type of content and to direct attention to it, whilst generally discarding other types of content considered not enough engaging. By drawing on the perspective of the semiotics of culture, this paper makes an analogy between Ju. Lotman’s model of the “semiosphere” and the Facebook’s digital semiosphere with the goal of unpacking how the selection, diffusion, and suppression of online content is geared towards the polarization of ideas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
进入Facebook的半圈。社交媒体如何影响数字仇恨并加剧网络极化
Facebook的符号圈之旅围绕着当前的争议,即算法如何在最大和最受欢迎的社交媒体平台之一Facebook中助长两极分化和不和谐。目前的工作集中在所谓的Facebook文件作为一个具体的案例研究。通过这些调查,本研究讨论了Facebook算法使用的原则,以便选择特定类型的内容并引起人们的注意,同时通常丢弃被认为不够吸引的其他类型的内容。本文借助文化符号学的视角,对二者进行了类比。Lotman的“符号圈”模型和Facebook的数字符号圈的目标是揭示在线内容的选择、传播和压制是如何与思想的两极分化相结合的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Semiotics
Social Semiotics Multiple-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
How emoji make meaning and enact ambient affiliation: a social semiotic account of emoji-text relations in TikTok comments The communicative linguistic landscape: Production formats and designed environments An introduction to language and social justice: what is, what has been, and what could be Harnessing comics as minoritarian interventions in the representation of conflicts and their everyday: the case of Vanni and Welcome to the New World Paratextual mediation and (re)framed narratives: a case study of Ganxiao liuji
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1