Characterization and cross-comparison of digital stethoscopes for telehealth remote patient auscultation

Yi Yang Ang, Li Ren Aw, Vivian Koh, Rex X. Tan
{"title":"Characterization and cross-comparison of digital stethoscopes for telehealth remote patient auscultation","authors":"Yi Yang Ang,&nbsp;Li Ren Aw,&nbsp;Vivian Koh,&nbsp;Rex X. Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.medntd.2023.100256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>— Stethoscopes are commonly used to diagnose cardiac and respiratory diseases. The advent of digital stethoscopes added the capability to remotely monitor the cardiorespiratory well-being of patients and facilitate digital remote auscultations for physicians to examine their patients outside of the clinic. To increase the adoption of a hybrid diagnosis between in-person and remote auscultations, it is important to characterize the frequency response of different configurations of digital stethoscopes. A standard testing platform was adopted from the literature and re-validated by seven physicians. Two wearable and two non-wearable digital stethoscopes were investigated. A similarity factor score was used to analyze select time-synchronized acoustic events that achieved high fidelity between stethoscopes. The frequency responses between devices were compared using the correlation coefficient. Two devices reported the highest correlation coefficient of 0.72 and 0.75 in the wearable and non-wearable categories, respectively. The correlation coefficient of the frequency responses between the same pair of devices on the human chest was 0.91. With such a high agreement in the frequency response between the wearable and non-wearable digital stethoscope, it can be concluded that the configuration of digital stethoscope is not a limiting factor of performance, and both are acceptable and desirable for physicians to adopt either configuration in remote delivery of healthcare.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33783,"journal":{"name":"Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590093523000516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

— Stethoscopes are commonly used to diagnose cardiac and respiratory diseases. The advent of digital stethoscopes added the capability to remotely monitor the cardiorespiratory well-being of patients and facilitate digital remote auscultations for physicians to examine their patients outside of the clinic. To increase the adoption of a hybrid diagnosis between in-person and remote auscultations, it is important to characterize the frequency response of different configurations of digital stethoscopes. A standard testing platform was adopted from the literature and re-validated by seven physicians. Two wearable and two non-wearable digital stethoscopes were investigated. A similarity factor score was used to analyze select time-synchronized acoustic events that achieved high fidelity between stethoscopes. The frequency responses between devices were compared using the correlation coefficient. Two devices reported the highest correlation coefficient of 0.72 and 0.75 in the wearable and non-wearable categories, respectively. The correlation coefficient of the frequency responses between the same pair of devices on the human chest was 0.91. With such a high agreement in the frequency response between the wearable and non-wearable digital stethoscope, it can be concluded that the configuration of digital stethoscope is not a limiting factor of performance, and both are acceptable and desirable for physicians to adopt either configuration in remote delivery of healthcare.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程医疗患者听诊数字听诊器的特性和交叉比较
--听诊器通常用于诊断心脏和呼吸系统疾病。数字听诊器的出现增加了远程监测患者心肺健康的能力,并为医生在诊所外检查患者提供了数字远程听诊的便利。为了增加现场听诊和远程听诊之间的混合诊断的采用,重要的是表征不同配置的数字听诊器的频率响应。采用文献中的标准测试平台,并由七名医生重新验证。研究了两个可佩戴和两个不可佩戴的数字听诊器。相似因子得分用于分析选择的时间同步声学事件,这些事件在听诊器之间实现了高保真度。使用相关系数比较设备之间的频率响应。两款设备在可穿戴和不可穿戴类别中的相关系数最高,分别为0.72和0.75。人体胸部上的同一对装置之间的频率响应的相关系数为0.91。由于可佩戴和不可佩戴数字听诊器之间的频率响应具有如此高的一致性,可以得出结论,数字听诊器的配置不是性能的限制因素,并且对于医生来说,在远程提供医疗保健中采用任何一种配置都是可接受和可取的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices
Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
64 days
期刊最新文献
The history, current state and future possibilities of the non-invasive brain computer interfaces Corchorus olitorius (Jute) fiber enforced sustainable polymeric dressing material for antimicrobial activity Diabetes mellitus: The pathophysiology as a canvas for management elucidation and strategies Development and validation of a multiplex RT-qPCR method for the simultaneous detection of influenza type A, B and SARS-COV-2 viruses GeneXAI: Influential gene identification for breast cancer stages using XAI-based multi-modal framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1