Improving Neurosurgery Resident Microdissection Through Placental Simulation

Nicolas E Alcalá, Hengameh B. Pajer, Martin G. Piazza, W. Goodnight, E. Yap, D. Sasaki-Adams, G. Hobbs, C. Quinsey
{"title":"Improving Neurosurgery Resident Microdissection Through Placental Simulation","authors":"Nicolas E Alcalá, Hengameh B. Pajer, Martin G. Piazza, W. Goodnight, E. Yap, D. Sasaki-Adams, G. Hobbs, C. Quinsey","doi":"10.1093/neuopn/okab026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Prior work has shown that the human placenta is an available and realistic model for microdissection simulation. We sought to find a measurable improvement in the technical skills of neurosurgical residents with deliberate practice of microdissection tasks using a placental model. Postgraduate year (PGY) 1 to 3 neurosurgery residents were consented. A 1-min video of each participant's baseline skills skeletonizing placental vessels was recorded. Participants underwent 10 practice sessions with intermittent informal feedback for 30-60 min over 18 mo. Another 1-min video was recorded following the 10th dissection. The videos were blinded and assessed by 3 board eligible or certified microsurgical neurosurgeons using a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Aneurysm Clipping Skills. Performance was compared via t-testing among four domains: instrument handling, time flow and forward planning, quality of dissection, and respect for tissue. Microdissection,  instrument handling, and quality of dissection were significantly improved after deliberate practice with the placental simulator (P < .05). Improvement was seen in time flow and forward planning and respect for tissue; however, this failed to be significant. Subjectively, residents expressed enjoyment performing the exercise. They also expressed a desire for demonstrations or videos to watch before practice sessions. The placental simulation model provides microsurgical skill development with minimal deliberate practice sessions. Practice exercises are favorably regarded and interest in continuing them is strong by residents. Residents expressed a desire to make the dissection more deliberate with demonstration, breakdown of steps, and mimicry, which could improve the effectiveness and enjoyment of the skills session.","PeriodicalId":93342,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuopn/okab026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Prior work has shown that the human placenta is an available and realistic model for microdissection simulation. We sought to find a measurable improvement in the technical skills of neurosurgical residents with deliberate practice of microdissection tasks using a placental model. Postgraduate year (PGY) 1 to 3 neurosurgery residents were consented. A 1-min video of each participant's baseline skills skeletonizing placental vessels was recorded. Participants underwent 10 practice sessions with intermittent informal feedback for 30-60 min over 18 mo. Another 1-min video was recorded following the 10th dissection. The videos were blinded and assessed by 3 board eligible or certified microsurgical neurosurgeons using a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Aneurysm Clipping Skills. Performance was compared via t-testing among four domains: instrument handling, time flow and forward planning, quality of dissection, and respect for tissue. Microdissection,  instrument handling, and quality of dissection were significantly improved after deliberate practice with the placental simulator (P < .05). Improvement was seen in time flow and forward planning and respect for tissue; however, this failed to be significant. Subjectively, residents expressed enjoyment performing the exercise. They also expressed a desire for demonstrations or videos to watch before practice sessions. The placental simulation model provides microsurgical skill development with minimal deliberate practice sessions. Practice exercises are favorably regarded and interest in continuing them is strong by residents. Residents expressed a desire to make the dissection more deliberate with demonstration, breakdown of steps, and mimicry, which could improve the effectiveness and enjoyment of the skills session.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过胎盘模拟改善神经外科住院医师的显微解剖
先前的工作已经表明,人类胎盘是一个可用于显微切割模拟的现实模型。我们试图通过使用胎盘模型仔细练习显微切割任务,发现神经外科住院医师的技术技能有了可衡量的提高。研究生院(PGY)1至3名神经外科住院医师同意。录制了一段1分钟的视频,记录了每位参与者的基本技能——剥取胎盘血管。参与者接受了10次练习,在18个月内进行了30-60分钟的间歇性非正式反馈。在第10次解剖后录制了另一段1分钟的视频。这些视频是由3名符合资格或认证的显微外科神经外科医生使用改良的动脉瘤夹取技能客观结构评估进行盲法和评估的。通过t检验比较了四个领域的性能:仪器操作、时间流和正向规划、解剖质量和对组织的尊重。使用胎盘模拟器仔细练习后,显微解剖、器械操作和解剖质量显著改善(P<0.05)。时间流、前瞻性计划和对组织的尊重都有所改善;然而,这并不重要。在主观上,居民们表达了对锻炼的享受。他们还表示希望在练习前观看演示或视频。胎盘模拟模型为显微外科技术的发展提供了最少的精心练习。练习操受到居民的好评,居民们对继续练习很感兴趣。居民们表示,希望通过演示、分解步骤和模仿,使解剖更加深思熟虑,这可以提高技能课程的有效性和乐趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spinal Venous Vascular Ectasia With Unusual presentation of Abdominal Pain: Case Report Subsuperficial Pectoralis Fascial Placement of Implantable Pulse Generators in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: Technical Note Awake Surgery for a Patient With Glioblastoma and Severe Aphasia: Case Report Changes in Distributed Motor Network Connectivity Correlates With Functional Outcome After Surgical Resection of Brain Tumors Successful Treatment of Pure Aqueductal Pilomyxoid Astrocytoma and Arrested Hydrocephalus With Endoscopic Tumor Resection Followed by Chemotherapy: A Case Report and Technical Considerations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1