Factors affecting corporate income tax compliance costs of SMEs in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Vernesa Lavic
{"title":"Factors affecting corporate income tax compliance costs of SMEs in Bosnia and Herzegovina","authors":"Vernesa Lavic","doi":"10.1108/jepp-02-2022-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeTo answer the following research questions: (1) What is the tax burden, on average, as a percentage of the generated revenues of companies in BiH? (2) Are there differences in the load level in relation to: (a) company size, (b) company location, (c) company age, (d) hiring of tax advisors and other external consultants on CIT issues and (e) company business activity.Design/methodology/approachIn order to answer the research questions asked, quantitative analysis of primary data purposefully collected for this research will be used. The empirical part of the paper relies on the collection of primary data through survey using the method of stratified random sampling from the population of SMEs enterprises registered in BiH focusing only on FBIH and the RS. Regression analysis (OLS model) was used to estimate results.FindingsAverage share of tax compliance costs in SME revenues is 8.3%. Tax compliance costs are regressive, dependent on company age, location and business activity as well as on whether companies hire external consultants.Research limitations/implicationsThe chosen research method is a telephone survey, with the aim of encouraging respondents to give answers to the questions asked, using experienced interviewers from the market research agency. However, the use of this method is not without limitations, and they refer to the time-limited duration of telephone interviews that require shorter questions, and pre-prepared answer options to make it easier for respondents to give answers. One of the challenges is the fact that most respondents do not want to talk to strangers over the phone and answer unknown numbers. This risk was especially pronounced because the topic of the research is related to CIT, so many respondents expressed doubts about the purpose of the question, refusing to provide accurate data. This risk was mitigated by asking questions to include certain scales in terms of income, number of employees and gross wages, to make respondents feel free to share this type of sensitive data with interviewers.Practical implicationsFirst, the analysis of this paper showed that specific, identified factors contribute to, or directly affect, the level of the tax compliance costs of corporate income tax in BiH. Second, there is currently no comprehensive analysis of the tax burden in BiH in the literature that would quantify the tax compliance costs, both at the BiH level and at the entity level. Based on the aforementioned, it is necessary to design a fiscal policy in such a way as to eliminate or, in cases where this is not possible, reduce the tax burden on the private sector in general. Based on the data collected in this research, fiscal policy should pay special attention to the tax treatment of start-ups, small and medium-sized enterprises and enterprises operating in services and other sectors by introducing tax incentives that will be of a general nature and that will be applicable to multiple activities and categories of enterprises, in order to eliminate the current negative effects of existing incentives aimed at predefined categories. Finally, it would be necessary to consider the possibility of closer and more extensive harmonization of entity tax laws, in accordance with international practices and accounting standards - in order to reduce the difference in burden primarily between entities, which would facilitate foreign investors and contribute to increased competitiveness in the domestic, regional and ultimately the global market. It would be desirable to use harmonization as a tool in support of promoting the competitiveness of the country in order to attract and maintain the level of foreign direct investment.Originality/valueThere is currently no comprehensive analysis of the tax burden in BiH in the literature that would quantify the tax compliance costs, both at the BiH level and at the entity level.","PeriodicalId":44503,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jepp-02-2022-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PurposeTo answer the following research questions: (1) What is the tax burden, on average, as a percentage of the generated revenues of companies in BiH? (2) Are there differences in the load level in relation to: (a) company size, (b) company location, (c) company age, (d) hiring of tax advisors and other external consultants on CIT issues and (e) company business activity.Design/methodology/approachIn order to answer the research questions asked, quantitative analysis of primary data purposefully collected for this research will be used. The empirical part of the paper relies on the collection of primary data through survey using the method of stratified random sampling from the population of SMEs enterprises registered in BiH focusing only on FBIH and the RS. Regression analysis (OLS model) was used to estimate results.FindingsAverage share of tax compliance costs in SME revenues is 8.3%. Tax compliance costs are regressive, dependent on company age, location and business activity as well as on whether companies hire external consultants.Research limitations/implicationsThe chosen research method is a telephone survey, with the aim of encouraging respondents to give answers to the questions asked, using experienced interviewers from the market research agency. However, the use of this method is not without limitations, and they refer to the time-limited duration of telephone interviews that require shorter questions, and pre-prepared answer options to make it easier for respondents to give answers. One of the challenges is the fact that most respondents do not want to talk to strangers over the phone and answer unknown numbers. This risk was especially pronounced because the topic of the research is related to CIT, so many respondents expressed doubts about the purpose of the question, refusing to provide accurate data. This risk was mitigated by asking questions to include certain scales in terms of income, number of employees and gross wages, to make respondents feel free to share this type of sensitive data with interviewers.Practical implicationsFirst, the analysis of this paper showed that specific, identified factors contribute to, or directly affect, the level of the tax compliance costs of corporate income tax in BiH. Second, there is currently no comprehensive analysis of the tax burden in BiH in the literature that would quantify the tax compliance costs, both at the BiH level and at the entity level. Based on the aforementioned, it is necessary to design a fiscal policy in such a way as to eliminate or, in cases where this is not possible, reduce the tax burden on the private sector in general. Based on the data collected in this research, fiscal policy should pay special attention to the tax treatment of start-ups, small and medium-sized enterprises and enterprises operating in services and other sectors by introducing tax incentives that will be of a general nature and that will be applicable to multiple activities and categories of enterprises, in order to eliminate the current negative effects of existing incentives aimed at predefined categories. Finally, it would be necessary to consider the possibility of closer and more extensive harmonization of entity tax laws, in accordance with international practices and accounting standards - in order to reduce the difference in burden primarily between entities, which would facilitate foreign investors and contribute to increased competitiveness in the domestic, regional and ultimately the global market. It would be desirable to use harmonization as a tool in support of promoting the competitiveness of the country in order to attract and maintain the level of foreign direct investment.Originality/valueThere is currently no comprehensive analysis of the tax burden in BiH in the literature that would quantify the tax compliance costs, both at the BiH level and at the entity level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那中小企业企业所得税合规成本的因素
目的回答以下研究问题:(1)波黑公司的税收负担平均占总收入的百分比是多少?(2) 负载水平是否存在以下方面的差异:(a)公司规模,(b)公司地点,(c)公司年龄,(d)就CIT问题聘请税务顾问和其他外部顾问,以及(e)公司业务活动。设计/方法论/方法为了回答所提出的研究问题,将对专门为本研究收集的原始数据进行定量分析。本文的实证部分依赖于通过使用分层随机抽样方法从波黑注册的中小企业人群中收集的初步数据,仅关注FBIH和RS。回归分析(OLS模型)用于估计结果。发现税务合规成本在中小企业收入中的平均份额为8.3%。税务合规费用是递减的,取决于公司年龄、地点和商业活动,以及公司是否聘请外部顾问。研究局限性/含义所选择的研究方法是电话调查,目的是鼓励受访者利用市场研究机构经验丰富的面试官对所问问题做出回答。然而,这种方法的使用并非没有限制,它们指的是电话采访的时间有限,需要更短的问题,以及预先准备好的答案选项,以便受访者更容易给出答案。其中一个挑战是,大多数受访者不想与陌生人通电话,也不想接听未知号码。这种风险尤其明显,因为研究主题与CIT有关,因此许多受访者对问题的目的表示怀疑,拒绝提供准确的数据。通过提问,包括收入、员工人数和总工资等方面的特定尺度,让受访者可以自由地与面试官分享这类敏感数据,从而减轻了这种风险。实际含义首先,本文的分析表明,特定的、已确定的因素有助于或直接影响波黑企业所得税的纳税遵从成本水平。其次,文献中目前没有对波黑的税收负担进行全面分析,以量化波黑一级和实体一级的税收合规成本。基于上述情况,有必要制定一项财政政策,以消除或在不可能的情况下减轻私营部门的总体税收负担。根据本研究收集的数据,财政政策应特别关注初创企业、中小企业以及服务业和其他行业企业的税收待遇,引入一般性质的税收优惠,适用于多种活动和类别的企业,以消除针对预定义类别的现有激励措施目前的负面影响。最后,有必要考虑是否有可能根据国际惯例和会计准则,更密切、更广泛地协调实体税法,以减少主要实体之间的负担差异,这将为外国投资者提供便利,并有助于提高国内、,区域市场,最终是全球市场。为了吸引和保持外国直接投资的水平,最好将统一作为支持提高国家竞争力的工具。独创性/价值文献中目前没有对波黑的税收负担进行全面分析,以量化波黑一级和实体一级的税收合规成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
15.80%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Institutions – especially public policies – are a significant determinant of economic outcomes; entrepreneurship and enterprise development are often the channel by which public policies affect economic outcomes, and by which outcomes feed back to the policy process. The Journal of Entrepreneurship & Public Policy (JEPP) was created to encourage and disseminate quality research about these vital relationships. The ultimate aim is to improve the quality of the political discourse about entrepreneurship and development policies. JEPP publishes two issues per year and welcomes: Empirically oriented academic papers and accepts a wide variety of empirical evidence. Generally, the journal considers any analysis based on real-world circumstances and conditions that can change behaviour, legislation, or outcomes, Conceptual or theoretical papers that indicate a direction for future research, or otherwise advance the field of study, A limited number of carefully and accurately executed replication studies, Book reviews. In general, JEPP seeks high-quality articles that say something interesting about the relationships among public policy and entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship and economic development, or all three areas. Scope/Coverage: Entrepreneurship, Public policy, Public policies and behaviour of economic agents, Interjurisdictional differentials and their effects, Law and entrepreneurship, New firms; startups, Microeconomic analyses of economic development, Development planning and policy, Innovation and invention: processes and incentives, Regional economic activity: growth, development, and changes, Regional development policy.
期刊最新文献
Experiences of women and minoritized US military veteran business owners: descriptive evidence on “vetrepreneur” survival and growth Barriers to scale: the effect of regulations on entrepreneurial strategies in a nascent industry Are shocks to entrepreneurship persistence? Case of a Resource-based economy Examining the antecedents of entrepreneurial propensity: a study among university students in India Context really matters: why do women artisans in the Peruvian context avoid the sole ownership of their enterprises?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1