The Effect of Time and Forest Disturbances on the Structural and Functional Characteristics of Fisher (Pekania pennanti) Resting Structures

IF 0.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ECOLOGY Northwest Science Pub Date : 2019-05-31 DOI:10.3955/046.093.0107
W. Zielinski, Fredrick V. Schlexer
{"title":"The Effect of Time and Forest Disturbances on the Structural and Functional Characteristics of Fisher (Pekania pennanti) Resting Structures","authors":"W. Zielinski, Fredrick V. Schlexer","doi":"10.3955/046.093.0107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The fisher is a mammalian carnivore that chooses resting locations each day. Refugia are essential, thus most of the fisher's resting locations are cavities in large live or dead trees. Tree growth and decomposition influence the creation of cavity-bearing structures, which may take centuries, but they can be lost to fire or harvest in an instant. Thus, the conservation of the fisher relies on an equilibrium between the loss of structures via disturbance and their creation. In the mid-1990s we studied fisher resting habitat by following radio-marked individuals to their resting locations. In 2016, roughly 20 years later, we assessed the risks that the resting structures were exposed to by overlaying the perimeters of fires and tree harvest units on the location of 192 resting structures. We also assess the effect of disturbance by examining 36 of them in the field. The mean distance from a resting structure to the nearest harvest unit was 651 m, with 16.8% estimated to be within a harvest unit. The mean distance of the resting structures to the nearest fire was 635 m with 51.0% estimated to be within a fire. Of 36 resting structures that were reevaluated or relocated in the field, 16 (44.4%) were of questionable use in 2016. Based on GIS analyses of disturbance coupled with field data on relocated structures, approximately 15–25% were potentially usable after 20 years. Managers planning actions should consider this a background level of loss of resting structures over 20 years—a background against which additional vegetation management can be considered.","PeriodicalId":49743,"journal":{"name":"Northwest Science","volume":"93 1","pages":"75 - 84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northwest Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3955/046.093.0107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The fisher is a mammalian carnivore that chooses resting locations each day. Refugia are essential, thus most of the fisher's resting locations are cavities in large live or dead trees. Tree growth and decomposition influence the creation of cavity-bearing structures, which may take centuries, but they can be lost to fire or harvest in an instant. Thus, the conservation of the fisher relies on an equilibrium between the loss of structures via disturbance and their creation. In the mid-1990s we studied fisher resting habitat by following radio-marked individuals to their resting locations. In 2016, roughly 20 years later, we assessed the risks that the resting structures were exposed to by overlaying the perimeters of fires and tree harvest units on the location of 192 resting structures. We also assess the effect of disturbance by examining 36 of them in the field. The mean distance from a resting structure to the nearest harvest unit was 651 m, with 16.8% estimated to be within a harvest unit. The mean distance of the resting structures to the nearest fire was 635 m with 51.0% estimated to be within a fire. Of 36 resting structures that were reevaluated or relocated in the field, 16 (44.4%) were of questionable use in 2016. Based on GIS analyses of disturbance coupled with field data on relocated structures, approximately 15–25% were potentially usable after 20 years. Managers planning actions should consider this a background level of loss of resting structures over 20 years—a background against which additional vegetation management can be considered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
时间和森林扰动对梭鱼(Pekania pennanti)静息结构和功能特征的影响
摘要渔夫是一种哺乳动物食肉动物,每天都会选择休息的地方。避难所是必不可少的,因此大多数渔民的休息地点都是大型活树或枯树上的洞穴。树木的生长和分解影响了空腔结构的形成,这可能需要几个世纪的时间,但它们可能会在瞬间被火灾或收获所破坏。因此,渔民的保护依赖于扰动造成的结构损失与其产生之间的平衡。在20世纪90年代中期,我们通过跟踪无线电标记的个体到它们的休息地点来研究它们的休息栖息地。大约20年后的2016年,我们通过将火灾和树木收获单元的周边覆盖在192个休息结构的位置上,评估了休息结构所面临的风险。我们还通过实地检查其中36个来评估干扰的影响。从休息结构到最近的收获单元的平均距离为651米,估计16.8%位于收获单元内。休息结构到最近火灾的平均距离为635米,估计51.0%在火灾范围内。在现场重新评估或重新安置的36个休息结构中,2016年有16个(44.4%)的用途值得怀疑。根据GIS对扰动的分析,再加上搬迁结构的现场数据,20年后约有15-25%的可用性。规划行动的管理者应将其视为20年来休息结构损失的背景水平,在此背景下可以考虑额外的植被管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Northwest Science
Northwest Science 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The pages of Northwest Science are open to original and fundamental research in the basic, applied, and social sciences. All submissions are refereed by at least two qualified peer reviewers. Papers are welcome from authors outside of the Pacific Northwest if the topic is suitable to our regional audience.
期刊最新文献
Bee Community Differences Among Urban and Rural Sites In Oregon's Willamette Valley Evidence of Bumble Bee Extirpation and Colonization, Galiano Island, British Columbia, Canada Ecological Characteristics of Diurnal Rest Sites Used by Ringtails (Bassariscus astutus) A Decade of Understory Community Dynamics and Stability in a Mature Second-Growth Forest in Western Washington Classification and Assessment of Riparian Ecosystems in Northwest Oregon for Restoration Planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1