Towards global public trust doctrines: an analysis of the transnationalisation of state stewardship duties

Q2 Social Sciences Transnational Legal Theory Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/20414005.2021.2006030
Joseph Orangias
{"title":"Towards global public trust doctrines: an analysis of the transnationalisation of state stewardship duties","authors":"Joseph Orangias","doi":"10.1080/20414005.2021.2006030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Public trust doctrines (PTDs) provide that natural resources, like air, trees and water, are common, shared property among citizens and therefore nation states should perpetually steward them. This article contributes a new conceptual framework for analysing and applying PTDs against global environmental issues. First, based on a review and synthesis of public trust scholarship, laws and judgments, an overview of PTDs across sub-national, national and international levels is provided. Second, three internationalisation processes of PTDs are defined and analysed, including states: spreading PTDs into other national and international legal systems; applying related international principles; and ratifying treaties with public trust regimes. Third, three transnationalisation processes of PTDs are defined and analysed, including states: stewarding natural resources beyond their territories; stewarding natural resources for all Earth's inhabitants; and jointly stewarding natural resources with other states and organisations. This article concludes that global PTDs are emerging from recent legislation, litigation and treaties.","PeriodicalId":37728,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Legal Theory","volume":"12 1","pages":"550 - 586"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Legal Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2021.2006030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Public trust doctrines (PTDs) provide that natural resources, like air, trees and water, are common, shared property among citizens and therefore nation states should perpetually steward them. This article contributes a new conceptual framework for analysing and applying PTDs against global environmental issues. First, based on a review and synthesis of public trust scholarship, laws and judgments, an overview of PTDs across sub-national, national and international levels is provided. Second, three internationalisation processes of PTDs are defined and analysed, including states: spreading PTDs into other national and international legal systems; applying related international principles; and ratifying treaties with public trust regimes. Third, three transnationalisation processes of PTDs are defined and analysed, including states: stewarding natural resources beyond their territories; stewarding natural resources for all Earth's inhabitants; and jointly stewarding natural resources with other states and organisations. This article concludes that global PTDs are emerging from recent legislation, litigation and treaties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向全球公共信任理论:国家管理职责的跨国化分析
摘要公共信任理论(PTD)规定,空气、树木和水等自然资源是公民之间的共同财产,因此民族国家应永远管理这些资源。本文为分析和应用PTD应对全球环境问题提供了一个新的概念框架。首先,基于对公共信托奖学金、法律和判决的审查和综合,提供了亚国家、国家和国际层面的PTD概述。其次,定义并分析了PTD的三个国际化过程,包括:将PTD扩展到其他国家和国际法律体系;适用相关国际原则;以及批准具有公共信任制度的条约。第三,定义并分析了PTD的三个跨国化过程,包括国家:将自然资源转移到其领土之外;为地球上的所有居民管理自然资源;与其他国家和组织共同管理自然资源。这篇文章的结论是,全球PTD是从最近的立法、诉讼和条约中产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transnational Legal Theory
Transnational Legal Theory Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The objective of Transnational Legal Theory is to publish high-quality theoretical scholarship that addresses transnational dimensions of law and legal dimensions of transnational fields and activity. Central to Transnational Legal Theory''s mandate is publication of work that explores whether and how transnational contexts, forces and ideations affect debates within existing traditions or schools of legal thought. Similarly, the journal aspires to encourage scholars debating general theories about law to consider the relevance of transnational contexts and dimensions for their work. With respect to particular jurisprudence, the journal welcomes not only submissions that involve theoretical explorations of fields commonly constructed as transnational in nature (such as commercial law, maritime law, or cyberlaw) but also explorations of transnational aspects of fields less commonly understood in this way (for example, criminal law, family law, company law, tort law, evidence law, and so on). Submissions of work exploring process-oriented approaches to law as transnational (from transjurisdictional litigation to delocalized arbitration to multi-level governance) are also encouraged. Equally central to Transnational Legal Theory''s mandate is theoretical work that explores fresh (or revived) understandings of international law and comparative law ''beyond the state'' (and the interstate). The journal has a special interest in submissions that explore the interfaces, intersections, and mutual embeddedness of public international law, private international law, and comparative law, notably in terms of whether such inter-relationships are reshaping these sub-disciplines in directions that are, in important respects, transnational in nature.
期刊最新文献
Toleration in the European Union: a forgotten virtue The construction of social Europe through transnational equality All in good time: temporal forms of public law decisions The Trojan Horse of sovereign debt Bluntschli, C’est Moi ? International legal history and hagiography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1