Stakeholder power play: Delta Airlines, voter rights and Georgia Senate Bill 202

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting CASE Journal Pub Date : 2022-04-12 DOI:10.1108/tcj-07-2021-0110
Stephanie E Raible, Olugbenga Adeyinka, Sarah Holtzen, M. Douglas
{"title":"Stakeholder power play: Delta Airlines, voter rights and Georgia Senate Bill 202","authors":"Stephanie E Raible, Olugbenga Adeyinka, Sarah Holtzen, M. Douglas","doi":"10.1108/tcj-07-2021-0110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nTheoretical basis\nThis case addresses stakeholder theory by asking students to consider the various entities that have a vested interest in Delta’s response to the passage of the Senate Bill (SB) 202. Stakeholder theory holds that businesses are responsible to broader constituents in society and not only to stockholders/shareholders or owners. This perspective suggests that businesses do not exist to maximize profit alone but also to enhance society in their day-to-day decisions. To this end, stakeholders are defined as entities that affect or are affected by an organization’s decisions. Stakeholder theory is based on three arguments: descriptive, instrumental and normative arguments.\n\n\nResearch methodology\nThe information presented in the case was sourced from secondary sources, including both company and media publications. Several media sources from a breadth of political orientations were used to capture the complexity of the issue and the decision at hand. The case development and premise started at the Eastern Academy of Management 2021 Annual Conference Case Hackathon. The case was piloted by eight students (seven undergraduates, one graduate student) in two different courses at two institutions. The student feedback helped to highlight where clarifications were needed within the case and resulted in modifications to the exhibits, appendices and discussion questions.\n\n\nCase overview/synopsis\nOn March 26, 2021, the media was buzzing about the passage of the Georgia SB 202, which included voting regulations perceived to negatively target black voters. As the head of the state’s largest employer, Delta Airlines’ Chief Executive Officer Edward Bastian found himself at the center of a heated political issue. While Delta had initially shown support for the bill, the rise in opposing voices and pressure to boycott Delta presented increasing pressure to think about its various stakeholders and potentially reevaluate the company’s handling of the situation. Should Bastiasn stay consistent with Delta’s initial support of SB 202, speak out to oppose it or remain silent?\n\n\nComplexity academic level\nUndergraduate students within business ethics or business in society courses are the best audiences for the case. The case may also be used in courses that have a portion of their content on business ethics or business in society; these related courses with subsections, modules or themes in this area may include corporate strategy, social responsibility and political activism.\n","PeriodicalId":52298,"journal":{"name":"CASE Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CASE Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tcj-07-2021-0110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Theoretical basis This case addresses stakeholder theory by asking students to consider the various entities that have a vested interest in Delta’s response to the passage of the Senate Bill (SB) 202. Stakeholder theory holds that businesses are responsible to broader constituents in society and not only to stockholders/shareholders or owners. This perspective suggests that businesses do not exist to maximize profit alone but also to enhance society in their day-to-day decisions. To this end, stakeholders are defined as entities that affect or are affected by an organization’s decisions. Stakeholder theory is based on three arguments: descriptive, instrumental and normative arguments. Research methodology The information presented in the case was sourced from secondary sources, including both company and media publications. Several media sources from a breadth of political orientations were used to capture the complexity of the issue and the decision at hand. The case development and premise started at the Eastern Academy of Management 2021 Annual Conference Case Hackathon. The case was piloted by eight students (seven undergraduates, one graduate student) in two different courses at two institutions. The student feedback helped to highlight where clarifications were needed within the case and resulted in modifications to the exhibits, appendices and discussion questions. Case overview/synopsis On March 26, 2021, the media was buzzing about the passage of the Georgia SB 202, which included voting regulations perceived to negatively target black voters. As the head of the state’s largest employer, Delta Airlines’ Chief Executive Officer Edward Bastian found himself at the center of a heated political issue. While Delta had initially shown support for the bill, the rise in opposing voices and pressure to boycott Delta presented increasing pressure to think about its various stakeholders and potentially reevaluate the company’s handling of the situation. Should Bastiasn stay consistent with Delta’s initial support of SB 202, speak out to oppose it or remain silent? Complexity academic level Undergraduate students within business ethics or business in society courses are the best audiences for the case. The case may also be used in courses that have a portion of their content on business ethics or business in society; these related courses with subsections, modules or themes in this area may include corporate strategy, social responsibility and political activism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利益相关者的权力游戏:达美航空公司,选民权利和乔治亚州参议院法案202
理论基础本案例通过要求学生考虑在德尔塔对参议院法案(SB)202通过的回应中拥有既得利益的各种实体来阐述利益相关者理论。利益相关者理论认为,企业对社会中更广泛的组成部分负责,而不仅仅是对股东/股东或所有者负责。这种观点表明,企业的存在不仅仅是为了实现利润最大化,而是为了在日常决策中增强社会。为此,利益相关者被定义为影响或受组织决策影响的实体。利益相关者理论基于三个论点:描述性论点、工具性论点和规范性论点。研究方法本案中提供的信息来源于次要来源,包括公司和媒体出版物。一些来自不同政治取向的媒体来源被用来捕捉问题的复杂性和手头的决定。案例开发和前提始于东方管理学院2021年会案例黑客马拉松。该案例由八名学生(七名本科生和一名研究生)在两所院校的两门不同课程中进行了试点。学生的反馈有助于强调案件中需要澄清的地方,并对展品、附录和讨论问题进行了修改。案件概述/摘要2021年3月26日,媒体对佐治亚州SB 202法案的通过议论纷纷,其中包括被认为对黑人选民不利的投票规定。作为该州最大雇主的负责人,达美航空首席执行官爱德华·巴斯蒂安发现自己处于一个激烈的政治问题的中心。虽然达美航空最初表示支持该法案,但反对声音的增加和抵制达美航空的压力越来越大,需要考虑其各个利益相关者,并可能重新评估公司对这种情况的处理。巴斯蒂亚森应该与德尔塔最初对SB 202的支持保持一致,公开反对还是保持沉默?复杂的学术水平商业伦理或社会商业课程的本科生是本案的最佳受众。案例也可用于部分内容涉及商业道德或社会商业的课程;这些相关课程包括企业战略、社会责任和政治激进主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CASE Journal
CASE Journal Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
We are the dreamers, we let it happen: Morocco’s soccer team leadership story Krishivan agri tourism: challenges for sustainability BMax consulting moves into Southeast Asia The “nicest place on the Internet”? Trouble at Pinterest, Inc Managing change in the face of a pandemic: the case of Cargills (Ceylon) PLC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1