Does the passé composé influence L2 learners’ use of English past tenses?

IF 1.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS International Journal of Learner Corpus Research Pub Date : 2018-05-31 DOI:10.1075/IJLCR.17007.DES
Sandra C. Deshors
{"title":"Does the passé composé influence L2 learners’ use of English past tenses?","authors":"Sandra C. Deshors","doi":"10.1075/IJLCR.17007.DES","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study explores the uses of the present perfect (PP) and simple past (SP) by French learners of English and assesses how those uses differ from those in native English and those of the passé composé (PC) in native French which, semantically, overlaps with PP and SP. Methodologically, the study is based on over 3,000 contextualized occurrences of PP, SP and PC, and includes cluster and collostructional analyses. Overall, relatively native-like form-function mappings in interlanguage emerge from the analyses, suggesting that, semantically, advanced learners have integrated the uses of past tenses and that the influence of the PC is relatively weak. Further, at an upper-intermediate to advanced proficiency level, learners have integrated the fine-grained contextual information characteristic of the use of English past tenses. Ultimately, the study shows how different methodological designs can lead to varying conclusions on the (non-)nativelike usage patterns of PP in interlanguage.","PeriodicalId":29715,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Learner Corpus Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1075/IJLCR.17007.DES","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Learner Corpus Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/IJLCR.17007.DES","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This study explores the uses of the present perfect (PP) and simple past (SP) by French learners of English and assesses how those uses differ from those in native English and those of the passé composé (PC) in native French which, semantically, overlaps with PP and SP. Methodologically, the study is based on over 3,000 contextualized occurrences of PP, SP and PC, and includes cluster and collostructional analyses. Overall, relatively native-like form-function mappings in interlanguage emerge from the analyses, suggesting that, semantically, advanced learners have integrated the uses of past tenses and that the influence of the PC is relatively weak. Further, at an upper-intermediate to advanced proficiency level, learners have integrated the fine-grained contextual information characteristic of the use of English past tenses. Ultimately, the study shows how different methodological designs can lead to varying conclusions on the (non-)nativelike usage patterns of PP in interlanguage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
被动语态是否影响二语学习者对英语过去时的使用?
本研究探讨了法语英语学习者对现在完成时(PP)和一般过去时(SP)的使用,并评估了这些使用与英语母语和法语母语中一般完成时(PC)的使用有什么不同,这些使用在语义上与一般完成时和一般过去时重叠。在方法上,该研究基于3000多个上下文化的一般完成时、一般完成时和一般完成时,并包括聚类和结构分析。总体而言,分析显示中介语中的形式-功能映射相对与母语相似,这表明,在语义上,高级学习者已经整合了过去时的使用,PC的影响相对较弱。此外,在中高级熟练程度上,学习者已经整合了英语过去时使用的细粒度上下文信息特征。最后,该研究显示了不同的方法设计如何导致关于中介语中PP的(非)母语使用模式的不同结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
27.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparing theory-based models of grammatical complexity in student writing Review of Leńko-Szymańska & Götz (2022): Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in Learner Corpus Research Review of Granger (2021): Perspectives on the L2 Phrasicon: The view from learner corpora The effect of linguistic and extralinguistic features on EFL adverb placement On learner characteristics and why we should model them as latent variables
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1