The Determinants of Indulgence in Corruption Among Law Enforcement Personnel in Malaysia

IF 0.3 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal Pub Date : 2022-04-30 DOI:10.24191/apmaj.v17i1-12
I. K. Norziaton, Zatun Najmiah Mohd Sabri
{"title":"The Determinants of Indulgence in Corruption Among Law Enforcement Personnel in Malaysia","authors":"I. K. Norziaton, Zatun Najmiah Mohd Sabri","doi":"10.24191/apmaj.v17i1-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the determinants of indulgence in corruption among law enforcement agency personnel in Malaysia. This study focussed on three law enforcement agencies in Malaysia, the Royal Malaysia Police Department, the Road and Transport Department, and the Immigration Department. The Fraud Diamond Theory was used to form the framework and develop the hypotheses. It concerns corruption among law enforcement personnel using the four elements: capability, pressure, rationalization, and opportunity. There were four hypotheses developed in this study. The researcher used face-to-face and online surveys (questionnaires) as data collection method and the participation of respondents was voluntary. 150 questionnaires were issued for the collection of data through an online survey and face-to-face interviews. The data collection process took two months, from May 2020 to June 2020. In the earlier part of the data collection process, 63 questionnaires were obtained, while 79 questionnaires were received towards the end of the period. Based on the findings, there is a significant positive correlation between self-influence and family influence-related and the indulgence in corruption among law enforcement personnel. This research indicated that family pressure and self-influence attributes were accepted. However, another two attributes namely public perception and peer pressure, were rejected. This study has important implications for national or international policymakers to acknowledge that anti-corruption policies play a crucial role to curb corruption among law enforcement agencies and understand the need to adopt these anti-corruption policies according to each nation’s economic and cultural context. Keywords: corruption, indulgence in corruption, law enforcement, fraud diamond theory","PeriodicalId":41923,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24191/apmaj.v17i1-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the determinants of indulgence in corruption among law enforcement agency personnel in Malaysia. This study focussed on three law enforcement agencies in Malaysia, the Royal Malaysia Police Department, the Road and Transport Department, and the Immigration Department. The Fraud Diamond Theory was used to form the framework and develop the hypotheses. It concerns corruption among law enforcement personnel using the four elements: capability, pressure, rationalization, and opportunity. There were four hypotheses developed in this study. The researcher used face-to-face and online surveys (questionnaires) as data collection method and the participation of respondents was voluntary. 150 questionnaires were issued for the collection of data through an online survey and face-to-face interviews. The data collection process took two months, from May 2020 to June 2020. In the earlier part of the data collection process, 63 questionnaires were obtained, while 79 questionnaires were received towards the end of the period. Based on the findings, there is a significant positive correlation between self-influence and family influence-related and the indulgence in corruption among law enforcement personnel. This research indicated that family pressure and self-influence attributes were accepted. However, another two attributes namely public perception and peer pressure, were rejected. This study has important implications for national or international policymakers to acknowledge that anti-corruption policies play a crucial role to curb corruption among law enforcement agencies and understand the need to adopt these anti-corruption policies according to each nation’s economic and cultural context. Keywords: corruption, indulgence in corruption, law enforcement, fraud diamond theory
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚执法人员放纵腐败的决定因素
本研究调查了马来西亚执法机构人员放纵腐败的决定因素。这项研究的重点是马来西亚的三个执法机构,即马来西亚皇家警察局、道路和运输部以及移民部。欺诈钻石理论被用来形成框架和发展假设。它涉及执法人员利用四个要素的腐败:能力、压力、合理化和机会。本研究提出了四个假设。研究人员采用面对面和在线调查(问卷)作为数据收集方法,受访者的参与是自愿的。通过在线调查和面对面访谈,发放了150份问卷,用于收集数据。数据收集过程耗时两个月,从2020年5月到2020年6月。在数据收集过程的早期阶段,共收到63份调查问卷,而在该期间结束时收到79份调查问卷。基于研究结果,执法人员的自我影响和家庭影响与腐败放纵之间存在显著的正相关。这项研究表明,家庭压力和自我影响的属性是可以接受的。然而,另外两个属性,即公众认知和同伴压力,被拒绝了。这项研究对国家或国际决策者承认反腐败政策在遏制执法机构腐败方面发挥着至关重要的作用,并理解根据每个国家的经济和文化背景采取这些反腐败政策的必要性具有重要意义。关键词:腐败、纵容腐败、执法、欺诈钻石理论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
The Intention of Empowering Excellence on the Path to Professional Qualification in Sustainable Development and Governance Is Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure Value Enhancing? Evidence from Top 100 Companies Corporate Reporting, Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Tax Aggressiveness: Evidence from Indonesia Islamic Work Ethics, Good Corporate Governance Practices and Fraudulent Financial Statements Council’s Online Disclosure of Accountability Practices: Isomorphism Inquiries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1