Gender disparities in alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

D. Lawin, T. Lawrenz, K. Marx, N. B. Danielsmeier, M. Poudel, C. Stellbrink
{"title":"Gender disparities in alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy","authors":"D. Lawin, T. Lawrenz, K. Marx, N. B. Danielsmeier, M. Poudel, C. Stellbrink","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2022-320852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Alcohol septal ablation (ASA) improves symptoms in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). We conducted a large retrospective analysis investigating gender effects on outcome after ASA. Methods and results 1367 ASAs between 2002 and 2020 were analysed. Women (47.2%) were older (66.0 years (IQR 55.0–74.0) vs 54.0 years (IQR 45.0–62.0); p<0.0001) with more severe symptoms. The interventricular septal diameter (IVSD) was higher in men (21.0 mm (IQR 19.0–24.0) vs 20.0 mm (IQR 18.0–23.0); p<0.0001) but the IVSD indexed to body surface area was higher in women (10.9 mm/m2 (IQR 9.7–12.7) vs 10.2 mm/m2 (IQR 9.0–11.7); p<0.0001). Women had lower exercise-induced left ventricular outflow tract gradients (LVOTG) 1–4 days after ASA (55.0 mm Hg (IQR 30.0–109.0) vs 71.0 mm Hg (IQR 37.0–115.0); p=0.0006). There was a trend for lower resting LVOTG 1–4 days after ASA (20.0 mm Hg (IQR 12.0–37.5) vs 22.0 mm Hg (IQR 13.0–40.0); p=0.0062) and lower exercise-induced LVOTG after 6 months in women (34.0 mm Hg (IQR 21.0–70.0) vs 43.5 mm Hg (IQR 25.0–74.8); p=0.0072), but this was not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction. More women developed atrioventricular (AV) block (20.3% vs 13.3%; p=0.0005) and required a pacemaker (17.4% vs 10.4%; p=0.0002) but not a cardioverter defibrillator (9.0% vs 11.6% in men; p=n .s.). However, in multivariable regression models, there was no evidence that sex independently influenced LVOTG and the occurrence of AV block. Conclusion Female patients with HOCM were older and had more advanced disease at the time of ASA. Women had superior short-term haemodynamic response to ASA but more often developed AV block after ASA. These results are important to consider for sex-specific counselling before ASA.","PeriodicalId":9311,"journal":{"name":"British Heart Journal","volume":"108 1","pages":"1623 - 1628"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2022-320852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective Alcohol septal ablation (ASA) improves symptoms in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). We conducted a large retrospective analysis investigating gender effects on outcome after ASA. Methods and results 1367 ASAs between 2002 and 2020 were analysed. Women (47.2%) were older (66.0 years (IQR 55.0–74.0) vs 54.0 years (IQR 45.0–62.0); p<0.0001) with more severe symptoms. The interventricular septal diameter (IVSD) was higher in men (21.0 mm (IQR 19.0–24.0) vs 20.0 mm (IQR 18.0–23.0); p<0.0001) but the IVSD indexed to body surface area was higher in women (10.9 mm/m2 (IQR 9.7–12.7) vs 10.2 mm/m2 (IQR 9.0–11.7); p<0.0001). Women had lower exercise-induced left ventricular outflow tract gradients (LVOTG) 1–4 days after ASA (55.0 mm Hg (IQR 30.0–109.0) vs 71.0 mm Hg (IQR 37.0–115.0); p=0.0006). There was a trend for lower resting LVOTG 1–4 days after ASA (20.0 mm Hg (IQR 12.0–37.5) vs 22.0 mm Hg (IQR 13.0–40.0); p=0.0062) and lower exercise-induced LVOTG after 6 months in women (34.0 mm Hg (IQR 21.0–70.0) vs 43.5 mm Hg (IQR 25.0–74.8); p=0.0072), but this was not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction. More women developed atrioventricular (AV) block (20.3% vs 13.3%; p=0.0005) and required a pacemaker (17.4% vs 10.4%; p=0.0002) but not a cardioverter defibrillator (9.0% vs 11.6% in men; p=n .s.). However, in multivariable regression models, there was no evidence that sex independently influenced LVOTG and the occurrence of AV block. Conclusion Female patients with HOCM were older and had more advanced disease at the time of ASA. Women had superior short-term haemodynamic response to ASA but more often developed AV block after ASA. These results are important to consider for sex-specific counselling before ASA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
酒精间隔消融术治疗肥厚型梗阻性心肌病的性别差异
目的酒精间隔消融术(ASA)改善肥厚型梗阻性心肌病(HOCM)的症状。我们进行了一项大型回顾性分析,调查ASA后性别对结果的影响。方法和结果分析了2002年至2020年间的1367个反卫星。女性(47.2%)年龄较大(66.0岁(智商55.0~74.0)vs 54.0岁(IQ45.0~62.0);p<0.0001),症状较重。男性的室间隔直径(IVSD)较高(21.0 mm(IQR 19.0–24.0)与20.0 mm(IQR 18.0–23.0);p<0.0001),但女性体表面积的IVSD指数更高(10.9 mm/m2(IQR 9.7–12.7)vs 10.2 mm/m2(IQ R 9.0–11.7);p<0.0001)。女性运动诱发的左心室流出道梯度(LVOTG)较低1-4 ASA后天数(55.0 毫米汞柱(IQR 30.0–109.0)与71.0 毫米汞柱(IQR 37.0–115.0);p=0.0006)。静息LVOTG 1–4有降低的趋势 ASA后天数(20.0 毫米汞柱(IQR 12.0–37.5)与22.0 毫米汞柱(IQR 13.0–40.0);p=0.0062)和女性6个月后运动诱导的LVOTG降低(34.0 毫米汞柱(IQR 21.0–70.0)与43.5 毫米汞柱(IQR 25.0–74.8);p=0.0072),但这在Bonferroni校正后没有统计学意义。更多的女性出现房室传导阻滞(20.3%对13.3%;p=0.0005),需要起搏器(17.4%对10.4%;p=0.0002),但不需要心律转复除颤器(男性9.0%对11.6%;p=0.0001) .然而,在多变量回归模型中,没有证据表明性别独立影响LVOTG和AV传导阻滞的发生。结论女性HOCM患者年龄较大,ASA时病情较晚期。女性对ASA有较好的短期血液动力学反应,但在ASA后更常出现AV阻滞。这些结果对于ASA前的性别特异性咨询非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A retrospective review of empiric acyclovir prescribing practices for suspected viral central nervous system infections: A single-centre study. Cortical Morphology in Cannabis Use Disorder: Implications for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment. Socioeconomic status and entrepreneurial networking responses to the COVID-19 crisis. Cardiac microstructural alterations measured by echocardiography identify sex-specific risk for heart failure. Aspirin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1