Use of split-course hypofractionated radiotherapy in palliative treatment of head and neck cancers: how does our regimen compare with others?

IF 0.3 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice Pub Date : 2023-03-09 DOI:10.1017/S1460396922000322
Sankalp Singh, N. Bisht, A. Sarin, Rekha Vashisht, Nishant Lohia, Vikas Gupta, G. Trivedi
{"title":"Use of split-course hypofractionated radiotherapy in palliative treatment of head and neck cancers: how does our regimen compare with others?","authors":"Sankalp Singh, N. Bisht, A. Sarin, Rekha Vashisht, Nishant Lohia, Vikas Gupta, G. Trivedi","doi":"10.1017/S1460396922000322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: Head and neck cancers (HNCs) are some of the commonest cases requiring palliative radiotherapy (PRT) in an Indian radiotherapy practice. A variety of PRT protocols have been explored with varying success. Methods: The study objective was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a short-course hypofractionated PRT schedule in HNC patients in terms of symptom relief, tumour response, acute side effects and survival and to compare results with other PRT regimens. All patients received 30 Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks followed by another 20 Gy in 5 fractions after a 4 weeks gap. Results: Seventy-five percent of patients completed both phases of treatment. Symptom relief was seen in 71% (pain) to 76% (dysphagia) of patients. Tumour response was recorded in 73% of patients. At 12 months, the mean overall survival was 10·29 months for patients who responded to PRT compared to 7·87 months for those who did not. Results were comparable to other regimens reported in the literature, but no radiobiological advantage of a higher dose was discernible. Conclusions: Short-course hypofractionated PRT is effective in reducing tumour burden and relieving symptoms in HNC patients and possibly in lengthening survival. Selection of any schedule should be decided by treating oncologists based on clinical, logistic and socio-economic factors.","PeriodicalId":44597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1460396922000322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Head and neck cancers (HNCs) are some of the commonest cases requiring palliative radiotherapy (PRT) in an Indian radiotherapy practice. A variety of PRT protocols have been explored with varying success. Methods: The study objective was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a short-course hypofractionated PRT schedule in HNC patients in terms of symptom relief, tumour response, acute side effects and survival and to compare results with other PRT regimens. All patients received 30 Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks followed by another 20 Gy in 5 fractions after a 4 weeks gap. Results: Seventy-five percent of patients completed both phases of treatment. Symptom relief was seen in 71% (pain) to 76% (dysphagia) of patients. Tumour response was recorded in 73% of patients. At 12 months, the mean overall survival was 10·29 months for patients who responded to PRT compared to 7·87 months for those who did not. Results were comparable to other regimens reported in the literature, but no radiobiological advantage of a higher dose was discernible. Conclusions: Short-course hypofractionated PRT is effective in reducing tumour burden and relieving symptoms in HNC patients and possibly in lengthening survival. Selection of any schedule should be decided by treating oncologists based on clinical, logistic and socio-economic factors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分程低分割放疗在头颈癌姑息治疗中的应用:我们的方案与其他方案相比如何?
摘要简介:头颈癌(HNCs)是印度放射治疗实践中最常见的需要姑息性放疗(PRT)的病例。已经探索了各种PRT协议,并取得了不同的成功。方法:本研究的目的是在症状缓解、肿瘤反应、急性副作用和生存方面评估短期低分割PRT方案在HNC患者中的疗效和耐受性,并将结果与其他PRT方案进行比较。所有患者在2周内分10次接受30 Gy的治疗,4周后再分5次接受20 Gy的治疗。结果:75%的患者完成了两个阶段的治疗。71%(疼痛)至76%(吞咽困难)患者症状缓解。73%的患者有肿瘤反应。在12个月时,对PRT有反应的患者的平均总生存期为10.29个月,而对PRT没有反应的患者的平均总生存期为7.87个月。结果与文献中报道的其他方案相当,但没有发现较高剂量的放射生物学优势。结论:短期低分割PRT可有效减轻HNC患者的肿瘤负担和缓解症状,并可能延长生存期。任何计划的选择都应由治疗肿瘤的医生根据临床、后勤和社会经济因素来决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice is a peer-reviewed journal covering all of the current modalities specific to clinical oncology and radiotherapy. The journal aims to publish research from a wide range of styles and encourage debate and the exchange of information and opinion from within the field of radiotherapy practice and clinical oncology. The journal also aims to encourage technical evaluations and case studies as well as equipment reviews that will be of interest to an international radiotherapy audience.
期刊最新文献
Wobbling nature of gamma passing rate as a function of calibration field sizes in patient-specific quality assurance Secondary fragmentation and relative biological effectiveness (RBE) study using Bridge SOI microdosimeter: Monte Carlo simulation Keratin-based topical cream for radiation dermatitis during head and neck radiotherapy: a randomised, open-label pilot study. Single catheter 3d volume based hybrid inverse planning optimization in IVBT can improve organ sparing – CORRIGENDUM Dosimetric case study of 3-D FiF vs. VMAT techniques in the treatment of H/N tumour
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1