41. HIGH COMPREHENSIVE COMPLICATION INDEX AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY ASSOCIATED WITH POOR SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM OUTCOME: A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING ANALYSIS

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2023-08-30 DOI:10.1093/dote/doad052.016
Ding-Qiang Chen, Junlan Cai, K. Weng, Zhinuan Hong
{"title":"41. HIGH COMPREHENSIVE COMPLICATION INDEX AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY ASSOCIATED WITH POOR SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM OUTCOME: A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING ANALYSIS","authors":"Ding-Qiang Chen, Junlan Cai, K. Weng, Zhinuan Hong","doi":"10.1093/dote/doad052.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The comprehensive complication index (CCI) is a new index to comprehensively and systematically evaluate complication severity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive ability of CCI on short—and long-term overall survival(OS) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) based on a propensity Score Matching (PSM) analysis.\n \n \n \n A total of 356 patients treated with radical MIE from 2013 to 2017 were included, and the primary outcome was OS, and the secondary outcomes were postoperative hospital stay and hospital costs. Firstly, the optimla cut-off value of CCI was determined by X-tile. PSM was used to balance the baseline characteristics. Second, we compared postoperative hospital stay and hospital costs between high- and low-CCI group. Third, the Kaplan–Meier survival curve was used to analyze survival difference. Fourth, univariate and multivariate Cox analysis was used to explore the independent risk factors of OS.\n \n \n \n The CCI > 24.2 was defined as high-CCI group and CCI≦24.2 was defined as low-CCI group. The high-CCI group had more hospital costs and longer hospital stay than the low-CCI group both before and after PSM (p < 0.001). The K-M analysis indicated that patients with high CCI had worse prognosis both before and after PSM (before matching: P < 0.001; after matching: P = 0.04). CCI was determined as independent prognostic factor both before and after PSM (before PSM, P = 0.002; after PSM, P = 0.025).\n \n \n \n The CCI could quantify postoperative complications after esophagectomy. High CCI is associated with longer hospital stay and hospitalization costs, and is an independent risk factor for poor OS.\n \n","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doad052.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The comprehensive complication index (CCI) is a new index to comprehensively and systematically evaluate complication severity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive ability of CCI on short—and long-term overall survival(OS) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) based on a propensity Score Matching (PSM) analysis. A total of 356 patients treated with radical MIE from 2013 to 2017 were included, and the primary outcome was OS, and the secondary outcomes were postoperative hospital stay and hospital costs. Firstly, the optimla cut-off value of CCI was determined by X-tile. PSM was used to balance the baseline characteristics. Second, we compared postoperative hospital stay and hospital costs between high- and low-CCI group. Third, the Kaplan–Meier survival curve was used to analyze survival difference. Fourth, univariate and multivariate Cox analysis was used to explore the independent risk factors of OS. The CCI > 24.2 was defined as high-CCI group and CCI≦24.2 was defined as low-CCI group. The high-CCI group had more hospital costs and longer hospital stay than the low-CCI group both before and after PSM (p < 0.001). The K-M analysis indicated that patients with high CCI had worse prognosis both before and after PSM (before matching: P < 0.001; after matching: P = 0.04). CCI was determined as independent prognostic factor both before and after PSM (before PSM, P = 0.002; after PSM, P = 0.025). The CCI could quantify postoperative complications after esophagectomy. High CCI is associated with longer hospital stay and hospitalization costs, and is an independent risk factor for poor OS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
41. 微创食管切除术后综合并发症指数高与短期和长期预后差相关:倾向评分匹配分析
综合并发症指数(CCI)是一种综合系统评价并发症严重程度的新指标。本研究的目的是基于倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析,评估CCI对食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)微创食管切除术(MIE)患者短期和长期总生存(OS)的预测能力。纳入2013 - 2017年接受根治性MIE治疗的356例患者,主要终点为OS,次要终点为术后住院时间和住院费用。首先,通过X-tile确定CCI的最佳临界值。PSM用于平衡基线特征。其次,我们比较了高cci组和低cci组的术后住院时间和住院费用。第三,采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析生存差异。第四,采用单因素和多因素Cox分析探讨OS的独立危险因素。以CCI≦24.2为高CCI组,以CCI≦24.2为低CCI组。高cci组在PSM前后的住院费用和住院时间均高于低cci组(p < 0.001)。K-M分析显示,高CCI患者在PSM前后预后均较差(配对前:P < 0.001;配对后:P = 0.04)。在PSM前后,CCI均被确定为独立预后因素(PSM前,P = 0.002;PSM后,P = 0.025)。CCI可以量化食管切除术后的并发症。高CCI与较长的住院时间和住院费用相关,是不良OS的独立危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1