In the Dog House: British Canines at Home, 1688–1832

IF 0.5 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE Home Cultures Pub Date : 2021-10-13 DOI:10.1080/17406315.2021.1963610
Stephanie Howard-Smith
{"title":"In the Dog House: British Canines at Home, 1688–1832","authors":"Stephanie Howard-Smith","doi":"10.1080/17406315.2021.1963610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Companion animals tangibly alter our experience of domestic spaces and influence our feelings about home. The Georgian era is well-established as a crucible of British domesticity, and animal historians identify the eighteenth-century as a pivotal moment in the development of ‘modern’ pet ownership. How did emotionally and physically intimate relationships between people and dogs affect their shared domestic spaces during this moment of flux? The experiences of dog owners and their acquaintances, as recorded in diaries and correspondence, testify to the ‘canification’ of the elite eighteenth-century home: people modified their homes to reflect their companions’ status within the household, just as dogs made their own mark on their home environment. The elevated position enjoyed by dogs in some Georgian homes is demonstrated by their ‘ownership’ of objects within the household, evidenced by wills, inventories, and canine material culture itself. However, this mode of dog ownership remained controversial and was frequently represented as emotionally and financially excessive. Critics targeted the elite dog’s privileged position within the home, finding their access to human objects and spaces indicative of their owners’ preference for canine company above their obligations to other humans — be they spouses, offspring or servants. Only by considering the eighteenth-century elite household as a multi-species domestic space and taking account of both human and non-human experiences of the home (and real or imagined representations of such experiences) can the development of British domesticity and, later, the formation of societally-approved ideals of pet ownership, be fully appreciated.","PeriodicalId":44765,"journal":{"name":"Home Cultures","volume":"18 1","pages":"129 - 149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Home Cultures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17406315.2021.1963610","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Companion animals tangibly alter our experience of domestic spaces and influence our feelings about home. The Georgian era is well-established as a crucible of British domesticity, and animal historians identify the eighteenth-century as a pivotal moment in the development of ‘modern’ pet ownership. How did emotionally and physically intimate relationships between people and dogs affect their shared domestic spaces during this moment of flux? The experiences of dog owners and their acquaintances, as recorded in diaries and correspondence, testify to the ‘canification’ of the elite eighteenth-century home: people modified their homes to reflect their companions’ status within the household, just as dogs made their own mark on their home environment. The elevated position enjoyed by dogs in some Georgian homes is demonstrated by their ‘ownership’ of objects within the household, evidenced by wills, inventories, and canine material culture itself. However, this mode of dog ownership remained controversial and was frequently represented as emotionally and financially excessive. Critics targeted the elite dog’s privileged position within the home, finding their access to human objects and spaces indicative of their owners’ preference for canine company above their obligations to other humans — be they spouses, offspring or servants. Only by considering the eighteenth-century elite household as a multi-species domestic space and taking account of both human and non-human experiences of the home (and real or imagined representations of such experiences) can the development of British domesticity and, later, the formation of societally-approved ideals of pet ownership, be fully appreciated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在狗舍里:1688-1832年的《英国犬在家》
摘要伴侣动物有形地改变了我们对家庭空间的体验,并影响了我们对家的感觉。格鲁吉亚时代是英国家庭生活的熔炉,动物历史学家认为18世纪是“现代”宠物饲养发展的关键时刻。在这个不断变化的时刻,人和狗之间的情感和身体亲密关系是如何影响他们共享的家庭空间的?日记和信件中记录的狗主人及其熟人的经历证明了18世纪精英家庭的“犬科化”:人们改造自己的家,以反映同伴在家庭中的地位,就像狗在家庭环境中留下自己的印记一样。在格鲁吉亚的一些家庭中,狗所享有的崇高地位体现在它们对家庭中物品的“所有权”上,遗嘱、库存和狗的物质文化本身就是明证。然而,这种养狗模式仍然存在争议,经常被认为是情感和经济上的过度。批评者将矛头对准了这只精英狗在家中的特权地位,发现它们接触人类物品和空间的机会表明,主人更喜欢狗的陪伴,而不是对其他人类的义务——无论是配偶、后代还是仆人。只有将18世纪的精英家庭视为一个多物种的家庭空间,并考虑到人类和非人类对家庭的体验(以及这些体验的真实或想象的表现),英国家庭生活的发展,以及后来社会认可的宠物饲养理想的形成,才能得到充分的重视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Home Cultures
Home Cultures ARCHITECTURE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
INSIDE RETIREMENT HOUSING: DESIGNING, DEVELOPING and SUSTAINING LATER LIFESTYLES Living With Things 15 Years on Thinglessness: Without Living Things Affective Clutter: Three Viewpoints on Lived Objects that Create Discomfort at Home Lose, Remain, Regain: Biographic Objects and Forced Migration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1