The Effects of Piano Training on Auditory Processing, Cognition, and Everyday Function.

Jennifer J Lister, Elizabeth M Hudak, Ross Andel, Jerri D Edwards
{"title":"The Effects of Piano Training on Auditory Processing, Cognition, and Everyday Function.","authors":"Jennifer J Lister, Elizabeth M Hudak, Ross Andel, Jerri D Edwards","doi":"10.1007/s41465-023-00256-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Learning to play a musical instrument is commonly recommended to avoid cognitive decline and dementia, but experimental evidence is lacking. In this Keys to Staying Sharp study, we investigated the efficacy of piano training as compared to music listening instruction to improve auditory processing, cognition, and everyday function among older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Older adult participants with and without MCI (<i>n</i>=268) included 58% females; 16% identified as Black race and 8.2% reported Hispanic ethnicity. Education ranged from 11 to 20 years. Participants were randomly assigned to either piano training (<i>n</i>=133) or an active control group of music listening instruction (<i>n</i>=135). Group training sessions were led by an instructor for 90 min twice a week for 20 sessions. Measures of auditory processing (time compressed speech, words-in-noise, dichotic digits test, dichotic sentence identification, adaptive tests of temporal resolution), cognition (trail making test, digit coding, verbal fluency), and everyday function (timed instrumental activities of daily living, test of everyday attention) were administered at baseline and immediately post the intervention phase. Analyses were registered at <i>Open Science Framework</i> https://osf.io/sh27y/ on April 25, 2018. Relative to music listening, no significant effects of piano training on auditory processing, cognition, or everyday function were found (<i>p</i>s>0.265). Future research should continue to examine the connection of impaired auditory processing with subsequent dementia and investigate whether effectively enhancing auditory processing by intervention may reduce dementia risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":73678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice","volume":"7 1","pages":"97-111"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12826660/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-023-00256-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Learning to play a musical instrument is commonly recommended to avoid cognitive decline and dementia, but experimental evidence is lacking. In this Keys to Staying Sharp study, we investigated the efficacy of piano training as compared to music listening instruction to improve auditory processing, cognition, and everyday function among older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Older adult participants with and without MCI (n=268) included 58% females; 16% identified as Black race and 8.2% reported Hispanic ethnicity. Education ranged from 11 to 20 years. Participants were randomly assigned to either piano training (n=133) or an active control group of music listening instruction (n=135). Group training sessions were led by an instructor for 90 min twice a week for 20 sessions. Measures of auditory processing (time compressed speech, words-in-noise, dichotic digits test, dichotic sentence identification, adaptive tests of temporal resolution), cognition (trail making test, digit coding, verbal fluency), and everyday function (timed instrumental activities of daily living, test of everyday attention) were administered at baseline and immediately post the intervention phase. Analyses were registered at Open Science Framework https://osf.io/sh27y/ on April 25, 2018. Relative to music listening, no significant effects of piano training on auditory processing, cognition, or everyday function were found (ps>0.265). Future research should continue to examine the connection of impaired auditory processing with subsequent dementia and investigate whether effectively enhancing auditory processing by intervention may reduce dementia risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钢琴训练对听觉加工、认知及日常功能的影响
人们通常建议学习一种乐器来避免认知能力下降和痴呆,但缺乏实验证据。在这项“保持敏锐的关键”研究中,我们调查了钢琴训练与音乐听力教学相比,在有或没有轻度认知障碍(MCI)的老年人中,钢琴训练对听觉处理、认知和日常功能的改善效果。有或没有轻度认知障碍的老年参与者(n=268)包括58%的女性;16%为黑人,8.2%为西班牙裔。受教育年限从11年到20年不等。参与者被随机分配到钢琴训练组(n=133)或音乐听力指导的积极对照组(n=135)。小组训练由一名教练带领,每周两次,每次90分钟,共20次。听觉处理(时间压缩语音、噪音单词、二分数字测试、二分句子识别、时间分辨率适应性测试)、认知(轨迹制作测试、数字编码、语言流畅性)和日常功能(定时日常生活工具活动、日常注意力测试)的测量在基线和干预阶段后立即进行。分析于2018年4月25日在Open Science Framework https://osf.io/sh27y/上注册。与音乐听力相比,钢琴训练对听觉加工、认知或日常功能没有显著影响(ps>0.265)。未来的研究应继续检查听觉加工受损与后续痴呆的联系,并研究通过干预有效增强听觉加工是否可以降低痴呆风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exogenous Spatial Attention Helps Overcome Spatial Specificity of Visual Learning in the Blind Field After V1 Damage. Anodal High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Left (but not Right) Parietal Cortex Facilitates Mental Arithmetic. Evaluating Risk and Benefit Sensitivity for Cognitive Treatments. Repeated Feedback Can Benefit Seven-Year-old's Uncertainty Monitoring in a Memory Task. Task-Irrelevant Phase but not Contrast Variability Unlocks Generalization in Visual Perceptual Learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1