An investigation into specialist practice nurses’ knowledge of cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines in a tertiary hospital in Gauteng Province, South Africa

IF 0.8 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Southern African Journal of Critical Care Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.7196/SAJCC.2020.v36i2.397
M. Botes, M. Moepeng
{"title":"An investigation into specialist practice nurses’ knowledge of cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines in a tertiary hospital in Gauteng Province, South Africa","authors":"M. Botes, M. Moepeng","doi":"10.7196/SAJCC.2020.v36i2.397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Cardiac arrest is among the major causes of sudden deaths globally. Although out-of-hospital cardiac arrest occurs more commonly, in-hospital cardiac arrest is still a major health problem. Critical care areas provide care to critically ill patients who are at risk of cardiac arrest. It is important that nurses are knowledgeable and competent in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in order to optimise the patient’s chances of survival and quality of life after cardiac arrest. Objectives To investigate specialist practice nurses’ knowledge of evidence-based guidelines for CPR Methods A descriptive cross-sectional survey was utilised. We sampled all critical care registered nurses (n=96) currently working in the adult emergency departments and intensive care units at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa. A self-administered instrument, the ‘evaluation questionnaire on CPR knowledge for health personnel from emergency services’ was used. Data were analysed using descriptive and comparative statistics. Results The mean CPR knowledge score was 46%. A score of 84% was considered adequate for a pass, and no respondents achieved this score. The majority of the respondents (80.85%; n=76) were specialists in the field of intensive care nursing. Conclusion The CPR knowledge of specialist practice nurses was suboptimal for the care required in high-risk settings. Further training is indicated. Contributions of the study We showed that specialist nurses working in critical care environments at a public hospital in Johannesburg scored poorly in a CPR knowledge test.","PeriodicalId":42653,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2020.v36i2.397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background Cardiac arrest is among the major causes of sudden deaths globally. Although out-of-hospital cardiac arrest occurs more commonly, in-hospital cardiac arrest is still a major health problem. Critical care areas provide care to critically ill patients who are at risk of cardiac arrest. It is important that nurses are knowledgeable and competent in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in order to optimise the patient’s chances of survival and quality of life after cardiac arrest. Objectives To investigate specialist practice nurses’ knowledge of evidence-based guidelines for CPR Methods A descriptive cross-sectional survey was utilised. We sampled all critical care registered nurses (n=96) currently working in the adult emergency departments and intensive care units at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa. A self-administered instrument, the ‘evaluation questionnaire on CPR knowledge for health personnel from emergency services’ was used. Data were analysed using descriptive and comparative statistics. Results The mean CPR knowledge score was 46%. A score of 84% was considered adequate for a pass, and no respondents achieved this score. The majority of the respondents (80.85%; n=76) were specialists in the field of intensive care nursing. Conclusion The CPR knowledge of specialist practice nurses was suboptimal for the care required in high-risk settings. Further training is indicated. Contributions of the study We showed that specialist nurses working in critical care environments at a public hospital in Johannesburg scored poorly in a CPR knowledge test.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对南非豪登省某三级医院专科执业护士心肺复苏指南知识的调查
背景心脏骤停是全球猝死的主要原因之一。尽管院外心脏骤停更常见,但院内心脏骤停仍然是一个主要的健康问题。重症监护区为有心脏骤停风险的危重患者提供护理。重要的是,护士在心肺复苏(CPR)方面有知识和能力,以优化患者在心脏骤停后的生存机会和生活质量。目的调查专业实习护士对心肺复苏循证指南的了解。方法采用描述性横断面调查。我们对目前在南非约翰内斯堡Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg学术医院成人急诊科和重症监护室工作的所有重症监护注册护士(n=96)进行了抽样。使用了一种自我管理的工具,即“急救服务卫生人员心肺复苏知识评估问卷”。使用描述性统计和比较统计对数据进行分析。结果心肺复苏知识平均得分为46%。84%的分数被认为足以通过考试,没有受访者达到这一分数。大多数受访者(80.85%;n=76)是重症监护护理领域的专家。结论专业实习护士的心肺复苏知识不适合高危环境下的护理。需要进一步培训。这项研究的贡献我们发现,在约翰内斯堡一家公立医院的重症监护环境中工作的专科护士在心肺复苏知识测试中得分很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: This Journal publishes scientific articles related to multidisciplinary critical and intensive medical care and the emergency care of critically ill humans.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of traumatic brain injury patients in an adult intensive care unit of a South African regional hospital, without on-site neurosurgical service: A retrospective quantitative study on the neurological improvement at discharge Groote Schuur Hospital neurosurgical intensive care unit: A 2-year review of admission characteristics Deep medicine ...  Navigating the intersection of technology, cognition and ethics in the digital age of medicine Core competencies in critical care for general medical practitioners in South Africa: A Delphi study Patient perceptions of ICU physiotherapy: ‘Your body needs to go somewhere to be recharged ... ’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1