A comparative study between lateral internal anal sphincterotomy and botulinum toxin injection in the treatment of chronic anal fissure

Abdulqadir Zngana, B. Hiwa
{"title":"A comparative study between lateral internal anal sphincterotomy and botulinum toxin injection in the treatment of chronic anal fissure","authors":"Abdulqadir Zngana, B. Hiwa","doi":"10.15218/zjms.2021.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objective: The gold standard for the treatment of chronic anal fissure is lateral internal sphincterotomy. Botulinum toxin injection provides temporary alleviation of sphincter spasm and allows the fissure to heal. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of lateral internal sphincterotomy and botulinum toxin injection treatments in patients with uncomplicated chronic anal fissure. Methods: A prospective comparative study was carried out at the surgical unit of Erbil teaching hospital, Erbil, Kurdistan Region of Iraq, from January 2017 to February 2018. Fifty-five patients were enrolled in this study. Five patients were excluded, and the remaining 50 patients were equally divided into two groups. Group A was managed with lateral internal sphincterotomy and group B with botulinum toxin. Postoperative pain relief, bleeding, fissure healing, incontinence, and relapse after six weeks and three months of follow-up were compared. Results: One month after treatment, 12% of the lateral internal sphincterotomy group had bleeding, while none of the botulinum toxin group (P = 0.234). Two patients (8%) of the lateral internal sphincterotomy group had pain while one (4%) of the botulinum toxin group (P >0.999).Three months after treatment, 4% of the lateral internal sphincterotomy group had bleeding, while none of the botulinum toxin group (P >0.999). None of the lateral internal sphincterotomy group had pain while one (4%) of the botulinum toxin group (P >0.999). Regarding healing, 96% of the lateral internal sphincterotomy group healed, while 92% in the botulinum toxin group (P >0.999). Conclusion: The outcome of lateral internal sphincterotomy and botulinum toxin were nearly the same, but lateral internal sphincterotomy required hospitalization, period off work, and risk of anesthesia. These risks were absent in botulinum toxin injection. Keywords: Chronic anal fissure; Lateral internal sphincterotomy; Botulinum toxin; Complications.","PeriodicalId":53383,"journal":{"name":"Zanco Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zanco Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15218/zjms.2021.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: The gold standard for the treatment of chronic anal fissure is lateral internal sphincterotomy. Botulinum toxin injection provides temporary alleviation of sphincter spasm and allows the fissure to heal. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of lateral internal sphincterotomy and botulinum toxin injection treatments in patients with uncomplicated chronic anal fissure. Methods: A prospective comparative study was carried out at the surgical unit of Erbil teaching hospital, Erbil, Kurdistan Region of Iraq, from January 2017 to February 2018. Fifty-five patients were enrolled in this study. Five patients were excluded, and the remaining 50 patients were equally divided into two groups. Group A was managed with lateral internal sphincterotomy and group B with botulinum toxin. Postoperative pain relief, bleeding, fissure healing, incontinence, and relapse after six weeks and three months of follow-up were compared. Results: One month after treatment, 12% of the lateral internal sphincterotomy group had bleeding, while none of the botulinum toxin group (P = 0.234). Two patients (8%) of the lateral internal sphincterotomy group had pain while one (4%) of the botulinum toxin group (P >0.999).Three months after treatment, 4% of the lateral internal sphincterotomy group had bleeding, while none of the botulinum toxin group (P >0.999). None of the lateral internal sphincterotomy group had pain while one (4%) of the botulinum toxin group (P >0.999). Regarding healing, 96% of the lateral internal sphincterotomy group healed, while 92% in the botulinum toxin group (P >0.999). Conclusion: The outcome of lateral internal sphincterotomy and botulinum toxin were nearly the same, but lateral internal sphincterotomy required hospitalization, period off work, and risk of anesthesia. These risks were absent in botulinum toxin injection. Keywords: Chronic anal fissure; Lateral internal sphincterotomy; Botulinum toxin; Complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外侧内肛门括约肌切开术与注射肉毒杆菌毒素治疗慢性肛裂的比较研究
背景与目的:治疗慢性肛裂的金标准是外侧内括约肌切开术。注射肉毒杆菌毒素可以暂时缓解括约肌痉挛,并使裂隙愈合。本研究旨在比较内侧括约肌切开术和肉毒杆菌毒素注射治疗无并发症慢性肛裂患者的疗效。方法:2017年1月至2018年2月在伊拉克库尔德斯坦地区埃尔比勒埃尔比勒教学医院外科进行前瞻性比较研究。55名患者参与了这项研究。5名患者被排除在外,其余50名患者被平均分为两组。A组采用外侧内括约肌切开术治疗,B组采用肉毒杆菌毒素治疗。比较术后疼痛缓解、出血、裂隙愈合、失禁以及随访6周和3个月后的复发情况。结果:治疗1个月后,12%的侧内括约肌切开术组出血,而肉毒杆菌毒素组无出血(P=0.0234)。2例(8%)侧内括约肌切除术组疼痛,1例(4%)肉毒杆菌毒素治疗组疼痛(P>0.05)。治疗3个月后4%侧内括约肌切断术组出血,而肉毒杆菌毒素组均无疼痛(P>0.999)。侧内括约肌切开术组无疼痛,而肉毒杆菌毒毒素组有4%疼痛(P<0.999),在愈合方面,侧内括约肌切断术组有96%愈合,而肉毒毒素组有92%愈合(P>0999),但外侧内括约肌切开术需要住院治疗、休息一段时间以及麻醉风险。肉毒杆菌毒素注射没有这些风险。关键词:慢性肛裂;外侧内括约肌切开术;肉毒毒素;并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correlation between auto-immune diseases and type 1 diabetes mellitus in the pediatric age group in Erbil city The development of ternary and quaternary solid dispersion based hydrotropic blends of atorvastatin calcium Drug metabolism and cytochrome P-450 (CYPs) Predictors of mortality among critical COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit in the Sulaimani governorate in 2021, Iraq Prevalence of COVID-19 among high school teachers in Erbil city
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1