Expanding the Concept of Materiality-to ESG: Audit Issues and Implications

IF 0.8 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Current Issues in Auditing Pub Date : 2022-10-20 DOI:10.2308/ciia-2022-010
Lynn E. Turner, T. Weirich
{"title":"Expanding the Concept of Materiality-to ESG: Audit Issues and Implications","authors":"Lynn E. Turner, T. Weirich","doi":"10.2308/ciia-2022-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of materiality has long been a basic feature in the US securities laws and regulations. With the current global and US efforts to develop new disclosure standards for Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG), a debate has emerged regarding expansion of the definition of materiality. An expanded definition would include not only financial materiality (i.e., how information affects an investor’s decision to buy or sell), but it would also include environmental and social materiality (i.e., how a company’s operations impact the climate, its employees, consumers, and society). This is referred to as “double materiality” (EU 2019). However, as discussed in this paper, the concept of materiality set forth in the US securities laws and court decisions are contrary to the concept of double materiality. This paper provides a brief history of materiality, expansion of the concept, and discusses audit issues and implications.","PeriodicalId":44019,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Auditing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Auditing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-2022-010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The concept of materiality has long been a basic feature in the US securities laws and regulations. With the current global and US efforts to develop new disclosure standards for Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG), a debate has emerged regarding expansion of the definition of materiality. An expanded definition would include not only financial materiality (i.e., how information affects an investor’s decision to buy or sell), but it would also include environmental and social materiality (i.e., how a company’s operations impact the climate, its employees, consumers, and society). This is referred to as “double materiality” (EU 2019). However, as discussed in this paper, the concept of materiality set forth in the US securities laws and court decisions are contrary to the concept of double materiality. This paper provides a brief history of materiality, expansion of the concept, and discusses audit issues and implications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将重要性概念扩展到ESG:审计问题及其影响
长期以来,重要性概念一直是美国证券法律法规的一个基本特征。随着当前全球和美国努力制定新的环境、社会和治理(ESG)披露标准,关于扩大重要性定义的争论已经出现。扩大后的定义不仅包括财务重要性(即,信息如何影响投资者的买卖决策),还包括环境和社会重要性(即,公司的运营如何影响气候、员工、消费者和社会)。这被称为“双重重要性”(EU 2019)。然而,正如本文所讨论的,美国证券法和法院判决中规定的重要性概念与双重重要性概念相反。本文简要介绍了重要性的历史、概念的扩展,并讨论了审计问题及其影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Issues in Auditing
Current Issues in Auditing BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Preparing Auditors to Evaluate Blockchains Used to Track Tangible Assets Comments of the Auditing Standards Committee of the Auditing Section of the American Accounting Association on the PCAOB’s Amendments to PCAOB Auditing Standards Related to a Company’s Noncompliance with Laws and Regulations and Other Related Amendments Comments of the Auditing Standards Committee of the Auditing Section of the American Accounting Association on the PCAOB’s Proposed Amendments Related to Aspects of Designing and Performing Audit Procedures That Involve Technology-Assisted Analysis of Information in Electronic Form Implications of Divided Responsibility in Audits Involving Component Auditors Editorial Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1